1. Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Our Present and Our Future Sandra Miller, MD Oregon Chapter Physician Leader Judy Dolins, MPH Director, Department of Community Chapter and State Principle Investigator, Chapter Quality Network Asthma Pilot Project

2. I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers(s) of any commercial products(s) and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME activity. Sandra Miller, MD Disclosure Judy Dolins Disclosure I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers(s) of any commercial products(s) and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME activity

3. National goals at the practice level  Changes in asthma care practices and child health outcome  Successful implementation of practice system change  Clinician investment and commitment to quality improvement work  Transparency and sharing of improvement data  Increased clinician demand for CQN programming

4. National goals at the chapter level  Increased capacity for quality improvement work  Governance group engagement  Sustain QI work at the chapter level  Key partnerships focused on improvement work  Funding and will for continued quality efforts  Increased chapter demand for CQN programming

5. Improvement Work Continuous tests of changeSustainability Imbed in everyday work Scale Up & Spread Taking local improvement And actively disseminating it across a chapter and/or practice Our First 6 months

6. CQN Asthma Pilot Sites MAINE OHIO OREGON ALABAMA

7. How are we doing at the National Level? Practice System Changes Percent of eligible providers collecting data at point of care

8. How are we doing at the National Level? Practice System Changes Registry Implementation Status

9. How are we doing at the National Level? Practice System Changes Options for Practices without a Registry

10. How are we doing at the National Level? Practice System Changes Degree of belief that workflows for collecting data for eligible patients/opportunities at point of care are highly reliable

11. How are we doing at the National Level? Measures of Asthma Care Practices and Health Outcome Key MeasureGoalAlabamaMaineOhioOregon National Average % of patients with 1 or more asthma-related ED or Urgent Care Visits within the past 12 months 0%21%20%35%24%25% % of patients with 1 or more hospitalizations within the past 12 months 0%5%4%7%6% % of patients well controlled 90%57%68%64%51%60% % of patients with optimal asthma care 90%75%71% 80%74% % of patients with key asthma indicators used when considering an asthma diagnosis 90%91%96%80%75%86% % of patients ages 5 and older in which spirometry is used to establish a asthma diagnosis 90%63%61% 56%60% % of patients in which a validated instrument is used to determine the current level of asthma control 90%99%93%99% 98% % of patients in which reasons for lack of asthma control is identified when asthma control is "not well controlled" or "very poorly controlled" 90%96%100%94%93%96% % of patients ages 5 and older where spirometry is scheduled to be tested or results have been obtained within the last 1-2 years 90%59%62%67%64%63% % of patients in which the stepwise approach is used to identify treatment therapy and adjust or maintain therapy based on asthma control 90%99%97%99%98% % of patients with asthma ages 6 months and older who have received a flu shot or flu shot recommendation within the past 12 months 90%93%98%93%94%95% % of patients who have a current written asthma action plan explained to them at this visit 90%82%78%79%85%81% % of patients in which self-management education materials (in addition to the asthma action plan) are provided and explained to the patient and family 90%81%84%83%74%81% % of patients for whom a follow-up appointment to monitor asthma control is recommended 90%95%89%94%95%93%

12. Optimal Care >70% of patients have “optimal” asthma care (all of the following) assessment of asthma control using a validated instrument stepwise approach to identify treatment options and adjust therapy written asthma action plan patients >6 mos. of age with flu shot (or flu shot recommendation)

13. Optimal Asthma Care Oregon = 80%

14. Self-Management Oregon = 74%

15. Use of a Validated Instrument Oregon = 99%

16. Hospitalizations Oregon = 6%

17. Patients Well-Controlled Oregon = 51%

18. How are we doing in Oregon? 11 practices with high level knowledge of QI processes and implementation Increase in use of action plans NHLBI guideline use in managing asthma Increased use of spirometry Increased familiarity with registry concepts Use of validated screening instruments Using PDSA to overcome barriers

19. Optimal Asthma Care

20. Asthma Action Plans

21. Self Management

22. Next Six Months Improve Sustain Grow

23. Improve Practices will continue to review their current office flow Changes should be refined Opportunities for ongoing changes should be identified Key Driver Goals

24. Sustain Practices should review current processes with a view to sustain changes made during the project Consider how to continue to motivate staff, physicians, and patients Consider how to make changes part of the NORMAL flow, not an exception Consider how the practice will function AFTER CAQI

25. Grow Practices should involve all practitioners in change Practices should consider how to spread change to other areas of focus (ie obesity, ADHD) Practices should consider how to spread change to other practices