3. Cosmology in superfluid 3 He Yuriy M. Bunkov C R T B T – C N R S, Grenoble, France

5. E P Fermi liquid Vc Ef Pf

7. Zurek scenario

9. Superfluid 3 He bolometry

15. Order parameter He-B R(n  ) H L S k d 3 L S H

16. HPD Catastropha PS Grenoble, 1999 A.S.Borovik-Romanov, Yu.M.Bunkov, V.V.Dmitriev, Yu.M.Mukharskiy, JETP Letters v.40, p.1033, (1984). Sov.Phys.JETPh, v.61, p.1199, (1985). I.A.Fomin, JETP Letters v.40, p.1036, (1984). Coherent, Magnetically Excited States Domain with Homogeneous Precession of Magnetization, 1984 Catastrophic relaxation Yu.M.Bunkov, V.V.Dmitriev, Yu.M.Mukharskiy, J.Nyeki, D.A.Sergatskov, Europhysics Letters, v.8, p.645, (1989).

17. 2. Coherenent State, which radiates the Persistent signal Moscow results Yu.M.Bunkov, S.N.Fisher, A.M.Guenault, G.R.Pickett, S.R.Zakazov, Physica B, v. 194, p. 827, (1994). Discovery, Lancaster, 1992 Yu.M.Bunkov, S.N.Fisher, A.M.Guenault, G.R.Pickett, Phys, Rev, Letters, v.69, p3092, (1992). ``Coherent Spin Precession and Texture in 3He-B.'' Yu.M. Bunkov, LT-21, Czechoslovak Journal of Phys. V. 46, S1, p. 231 (1996). Lancaster experimental conformation Yu.M. Bunkov, D.J. Cousins, M.P.Enrico, S.N.Fisher, G.R.Pickett, N.S.Shaw, W.Tych, LT-21, Czechoslovak Journal of Phys. V. 46, S1, p. 233 (1996). Moscow Lancaster

18. Q-ball - Spherically symmetric non-topological soliton with conserved global charge Q Proposed by S.Colleman (1985) in frame of relativistic field theory as a semi-classical model of elementary particles formation Current interest due to Q-balls dark matter model E(mQ)  <  E(Q) m In relativistic field theory  (r t)  exp(- i  t)  (r) Q = d 3 x[i(  d t  d t  ] E  d 3 x[ I  I 2   I  I 2  U(I  I)]  Q (r) = S - S z (r) dEd dS z =   =  H dd (S,L) S + (r) = S (r) e i  t In 3 He-B

19. LzLz SzSz 0 1 0 1 1 Q (r) = S - S z (r) dEd dS z =   =  H dd (S,L) S + (r) = S (r) e i  t In 3 He-B EdEd R(n  ) L S H L H S

20. H L S Follow Voislav Golo algorithm (15 equations) Spatial case Yu.M.Bunkov, V.L.Golo, J Low Temp Phys, to be published + E grad + E surf

21. Position, 0.1 mm Angles of deflection, degree

22. Position, 0.1 mm Angles of deflection, degree

23. Position, 0.1 mm Angles of deflection, degree

24. Larmore freq. Max NMR shift

25. H L S 3D Q-ball

26. H L S Q ball on topological defect

27. HH Computer simulation Grenoble 2004 H Lz LHLH z Calculations of a spatial deflection of spin and orbit on basis of Poisson brackets and Takagi relaxation Follow Voislav Golo algorithm

28. Grenoble, 2004 Angles of deflection, degree Position, 0.1 mm

29. Grenoble, 2004 Angles of deflection, degree Position, 0.1 mm

30. 1% HPD

31. H L S

32. Grenoble experiments with Non-linear Stationary Spin Waves 0.25 Tc A.-S. Chen, Yu.M. Bunkov, H. Godfrin, R. Schanen, F. Scheffer. J. Low Temp. Phys, 110, p. 51, (1998).

33. Following Landau and Lifchitz we consider an anharmonic oscillator with a third order of nonlinearity Non-linear Stationary Spin-waves – or Q ball, if you like! A.S. Chen,Yu. M. Bunkov, H. Godfrin, R. Schanen and F. Scheffler J. of Low Temp. Phys. 113, 693 (1998).

34. HH   H  =  H+ Hz  Quantum billiard Anne-Sophie CHEN, Ph D Thesis, Grenoble, (1999)

35. Grenoble, 1999 Off-resonante NMR excitation D.J.Cousins, S.N.Fisher, A.I.Gregory, G.R.Pickett, N.S.Shaw, Phys. Rev. Lett, 82, 4484, (1999) Anne-Sophie CHEN, Ph D Thesis, Grenoble, (1999) s p d  rf  Qb  dd

36. http://boojum.hut.fi/personnel/THEORY/volovik.html Grigori Volovik

47. Non-linear Stationary Spin Waves in Flared out texture NMR of Rotated superfluid 3He-B O.T.Ikkala, G.E.Volovik, P.Y.Hakonen, Yu.M.Bunkov, S.T.Islander, G.A.Haradze, JETP Letters v.35, p.416 (1982). L First observation of Spin Waves in Orbital Texture D.D.Osheroff, Physica B, 90, 20 (1977). Angle L-H Before rotationDuring rotationAfter rotation H