1. Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011

2. Board of County Commissioners Project :Tupperware Heights PD/ Tupperware Heights PSP District #:4 Proposed Use: 3 Commercial/Office/Multi-family (age-restricted ) : Commercial/Office: 215,883 sq. ft. - Max. building height (Commercial): 50’ - Max. building height (Office): 85’ Multi-family (age-restricted): 958 units - Max. building height: 85 ft./7 stories - Min. living area: 750 sq. ft. - Project :Tupperware Heights PD/ Tupperware Heights PSP District #:4 Proposed Use: 3 Commercial/Office/Multi-family (age-restricted ) : Commercial/Office: 215,883 sq. ft. - Max. building height (Commercial): 50’ - Max. building height (Office): 85’ Multi-family (age-restricted): 958 units - Max. building height: 85 ft./7 stories - Min. living area: 750 sq. ft. -

3. Board of County Commissioners Tupperware Heights PD/ Tupperware Heights PSP Location Map Tupperware Heights PD/ Tupperware Heights PSP Location Map

4. Board of County Commissioners Tupperware Heights PD/ Tupperware Heights Preliminary Subdivision Plan Tupperware Heights PD/ Tupperware Heights Preliminary Subdivision Plan

5. Board of County Commissioners  Approve the Tupperware Heights Planned Development/Tupperware Heights Preliminary Subdivision Plan dated “Received August 18, 2010,” subject to the twelve (12) conditions in the staff report. Action Requested

6. Board of County Commissioners 1.Development shall conform to the Tupperware Heights Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Tupperware Heights Preliminary Subdivision Plan dated "Received August 18, 2010" and to the following conditions of approval. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances and regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this preliminary subdivision plan and the actual preliminary subdivision plan dated "Received August 18, 2010," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. DRC Recommendations

7. Board of County Commissioners 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a “promise” or “representation” shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

8. Board of County Commissioners 3. Prior to construction plan approval for each lot, a master stormwater management plan including a drainage study to establish the 100-year flood elevation shall be submitted to the Development Engineering Division for review and approval. 4. The stormwater management system shall be designed to retain the 100- year/24-hour storm event onsite, unless documentation with supporting calculations is submitted, which demonstrates that a positive outfall is available. If the applicant can show the existence of a positive outfall for the subject basin, then the developer shall comply with all applicable state and local stormwater requirements and regulations. An emergency high water relief outfall shall be provided to assure overflow does not cause flooding of surrounding areas. 5. Prior to the issuance of any vertical building permits, the plat of the entire subdivision including all wetlands, wetland buffers and tracts shall be approved on the BCC Consent Agenda. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

9. Board of County Commissioners 6. There shall not be any development within Tract A. 7.Unless a Conservation Area Impact (CAI) permit is approved by Orange County consistent with Chapter 15 prior to Construction Plan approval, no conservation area or buffer encroachments shall be permitted. 8.Prior to earthwork or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NOI) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 9.Billboards and pole signs shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Ch. 31.5. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

10. Board of County Commissioners 10. Outdoor sales, storage and display shall be prohibited. 11. Prior to construction plan approval, certification with supporting calculations shall be submitted which states that this project is consistent with the approved Master Utility Plan for this PD. 12. Compliance with the arbor ordinance shall occur with individual development plan. No mass grading shall occur without an approved development plan. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

11. Board of County Commissioners Project : Meadow Woods PD/LUP - Substantial Change Applicant: Jim Hall District #: 4 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Meadow Woods Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to: Project : Meadow Woods PD/LUP - Substantial Change Applicant: Jim Hall District #: 4 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Meadow Woods Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to:

12. Board of County Commissioners Request: 1)Eliminate the future access road north of the Central Florida Greeneway from Rhode Island Woods Circle between Parcels 20 & 21 and the adjoining property to the east; 2)Request High Density Residential (HDR), along with the existing Neighborhood Commercial (NC) on Parcel 12, to accommodate a proposed 156-unit multi-family development. This shall be achieved through the conversion of 26 single-family units to multi-family units using the equivalency matrix, resulting in 53 new multi-family units. These units shall be added to the 103 existing multi-family units, for a total of 156; 3)Grant a waiver from Section 38-1258(e) for Parcel 12 in order to allow for understory trees with a maximum height of ten (10) feet in lieu of all shade trees as required per Type C buffers due to the existing power lines; and 4)Grant a waiver from Section 24-4(a)(3) c. and d. for Parcel 12 in order to allow for understory trees with a maximum height of ten (10) feet in lieu of all required shade trees within interior landscaped areas due to the existing power lines. Request: 1)Eliminate the future access road north of the Central Florida Greeneway from Rhode Island Woods Circle between Parcels 20 & 21 and the adjoining property to the east; 2)Request High Density Residential (HDR), along with the existing Neighborhood Commercial (NC) on Parcel 12, to accommodate a proposed 156-unit multi-family development. This shall be achieved through the conversion of 26 single-family units to multi-family units using the equivalency matrix, resulting in 53 new multi-family units. These units shall be added to the 103 existing multi-family units, for a total of 156; 3)Grant a waiver from Section 38-1258(e) for Parcel 12 in order to allow for understory trees with a maximum height of ten (10) feet in lieu of all shade trees as required per Type C buffers due to the existing power lines; and 4)Grant a waiver from Section 24-4(a)(3) c. and d. for Parcel 12 in order to allow for understory trees with a maximum height of ten (10) feet in lieu of all required shade trees within interior landscaped areas due to the existing power lines.

13. Board of County Commissioners Zoning Map

14. Board of County Commissioners Future Land Use Map Future Land Use Map

15. Board of County Commissioners Meadow Woods Land Use Plan Meadow Woods Land Use Plan

16. Board of County Commissioners Action Requested  Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the approved Meadow Woods PD/LUP dated “Received October 5, 2010,” subject to the four (6) conditions in the staff report.

17. Board of County Commissioners 1.Development shall conform to the LUP, dated "Received October 5, 2010," and to the following conditions of approval Development based upon this approval shall comply with all other applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, and regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), or by action of the BCC. DRC Recommendations

18. Board of County Commissioners 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. The access configuration point to Parcel 12 shall be determined at the DP submittal. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

19. Board of County Commissioners 4. All previous applicable Conditions of Approval, including those dated September 9, 2003, and December 11, 2001, shall apply: a) Reduce the number of units from 14.9 units per acre to 6 units per acre for a total of 296 units. THIS CONDITION PERTAINS TO PARCELS 28, 29, AND 30.2. b) Restrict the type of structure to townhomes with fee simple ownership. THIS CONDITION PERTAINS TO PARCELS 28, 29, AND 30.2. c) Tower shall meet all the requirements of the communication tower ordinance. Any variance shall require approval by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

20. Board of County Commissioners 5. Grant a waiver from Section 38-1258(e) for Parcel 12 in order to allow for understory trees with a maximum height of ten (10) feet in lieu of all shade trees as required per Type C buffers due to the existing power lines; and 6.Grant a waiver from Section 24-4(a)(3) c. and d. for Parcel 12 in order to allow for understory trees with a maximum height of ten (10) feet in lieu of all required shade trees within interior landscaped areas due to the existing power lines. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

21. Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING