1. Leadership Institute Branch Legal Training Section What is the Castle Doctrine? Use of Force Roll Call Training 2014-1

2. Objective At the end of this review, the viewer will be able to: Describe the changes made to Kentucky law by the “Castle Doctrine.” RCT 2014-22

3. The Castle Doctrine In general, the Castle Doctrine is used to describe the ability of a individual to defend themselves (and others) from an attack in an area where that individual has a legal right to be, such as their home. It permits that individual to use any force necessary, up to and including deadly force, to do so. RCT 2014-23

4. In Kentucky Although many elements of the Castle Doctrine were already part of Kentucky law, in 2006, the General Assembly amended certain statutes in KRS 503 and added several new ones to include explicit new provisions. RCT 2014-24

5. Definitions The General Assembly added and modified definitions in KRS 503.010. Dwelling was expanded to include a porch area that is under roof, as well as tents and other areas that are designed to be occupied by people at night. RCT 2014-25

6. Definitions Definitions were also added and amended: Residence includes any dwelling in “which a person resides either temporarily or permanent or as an invited guest.” Vehicle includes any conveyance “whether or not motorized which is designed to transport people or property. RCT 2014-26

7. Felony involving a Use of Force Both KRS 503.050 (Protection of Self) and KRS 503.070 (Protection of Another) were amended to include any “felony involving a use of force” as a justification to use deadly force. Although not listed specifically, that definition might include, for example, Robbery and the higher degrees of Assault RCT 2014-27

8. Duty to Retreat In addition, in both statutes, and others, it is noted that there is no “duty to retreat” prior to a use of deadly physical force. In other words, you don’t have to leave a location where you have a right to be. RCT 2014-28

9. KRS 503.055 KRS 503.055 is a completely new statute, added in 2006, and is at the heart of the Castle Doctrine. It explicitly provides that there is be a legal presumption of fear under certain circumstances – meaning that the subject does not have to “prove” it. RCT 2014-29

10. KRS 503.055 For example, an individual will be legally presumed to be in fear if someone “unlawfully and forcibly” enters their dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle and/or tries to remove them from the same location. RCT 2014-210

11. However …. The presumption does not apply when the force is directed toward someone who has a legal right to be at that location, unless there is an order (such as an EPO/DVO) that prohibits them from the location. It does not apply when a person is trying to remove a child of whom they have lawful custody RCT 2014-211

12. However …. The presumption also does not apply when the force is directed toward someone who has entered a location to prevent an unlawful act against another and has a legal right to be at that location, unless there is an order (such as an EPO/DVO) that prohibits them from the location. RCT 2014-212

13. Most importantly for LE … The presumption does not apply when the force is used against a peace officer who is entering in performance of their official duties and who clearly identifies themselves as a peace officer, such that the person using force should have reasonably known they were using force against a peace officer. RCT 2014-213

14. Stand Your Ground This is the only place in Kentucky law where “stand your ground” actually appears – as KRS 503.055(3) provides that if an individual is in a place where they have a lawful right to be, and doing nothing unlawful themselves, they have no duty to retreat and may stand their ground and use appropriate force, including deadly physical force, to defend themselves. RCT 2014-214

15. Immunity Provisions KRS 503.085 is another statute added in 2006. It provides for civil and criminal immunity for an individual who uses force, including deadly force. Specifically, it prohibits the arrest, detention, charging or criminal prosecution of an individual who is able to make a legitimate claim of self-defense RCT 2014-215

16. Immunity Provisions However, it does not apply if the use of force was against an identified peace officer. This law does not prevent an agency from investigating but an arrest should not be made unless it is determined that there is probable cause that the force used was unlawful. RCT 2014-216

17. Penalty If an improper arrest is made, the Court may award attorney’s fees, court costs and other compensation if it determines that the individual is immune from prosecution due to a valid claim of self-defense. RCT 2014-217

18. Summary In this brief roll call training, we have discussed the Castle Doctrine as it applies in Kentucky. Although there are only a few changes to existing Kentucky law, the changes are important for law enforcement officers to understand. RCT 2014-218

19. Summary Of critical importance is the need to delay any arrest or detention in situations where the individual who used force has at least an arguable claim that they were using lawful force. In such situations, officers should continue with the investigation but confer with local prosecutors before making an actual arrest. RCT 2014-219

20. Questions? If you have any questions concerning this presentation, please feel free to contact the Legal Training Section in one of the following ways: Website: www.docjt.ky.gov/legalwww.docjt.ky.gov/legal Phone: 859-622-3801 Email:docjt.legal@ky.govdocjt.legal@ky.gov RCT 2014-220