1. Sound-Event Partitioning and Feature Normalization for Robust Sound-Event Detection 2 Department of Electronic and Information Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China Baiying LEI 1,2 Man-Wai MAK 2 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China Funding Sources: Motorola Solutions Foundation The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

2. 2 Contents 1.Motivations of Sound-Event Detection 2.Objectives 3.Methodology – System Architecture – Acoustic Features and Fusion – Sound Event Partitioning 4.Experiments and Results 5.Conclusions 2

3. Under some situations (e.g., in a washroom), surveillance via video cameras is inappropriate. Audio is a viable alternative under such situations. With the high processing power of today’s smartphones, it becomes possible to turn a smartphone into a personal audio surveillance and monitoring system. Audio-based surveillance can make effective use of mobile devices, allowing the surveillance system to be moved from one place to another easily. Abnormal sound events such as screaming can be detected and emergency phone calls can be automatically made. 3 Motivation

4. 1.Determining suitable acoustic features for scream sound detection 2.Addressing the data-imbalance problem (scream vs. non-scream) in training SVM classifiers 3.Implement the detection algorithm on mobile phones 4 Objectives of This Work

5. 5 Methodology

6. 6 System Architecture Android App Playback background noise Playback sound events

7. 7 Feature Extraction and Fusion Characteristics of scream sounds –Almost impossible to detect them in the time domain –But their spectral characteristics are still visible in the spectrogram under very noise condition

8. 8 Feature Extraction and Fusion Time-Frequency Acoustic Features –MFCC (Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients) Commonly used in speech and speaker recognition systems Known to be not very noise robust –GFCC (Gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients) Based on auditory filtering and cepstral analysis More noise robust than MFCC

9. 9 Feature Extraction and Fusion Correlation between MFCC and GFCC Fusion may help improve performance

10. 10 Feature Extraction and Fusion Feature Fusion: Score Fusion: –Fuse the scores produced by MFCC-based and GFCC-based SVM classifiers SVM scores

11. Feature Extraction and Fusion Feature Fusion + Score Fusion: Score from feature-fusion SVM Score from score-fusion SVM

12. PCA Whitening and Normalization P: projection matrix comprising eigenvectors λ: Eigenvalues

13. Sound-Event Partitioning Based on our previously work on Utterance Partitioning for speaker verification

14. 14 Experiments and Results

15. 15 Sound Data 1000 sound events collected from –Human Sound Effect (www.sound-ideas.com) –Freesound.org 240 Screams and 760 Non-screams Non-Screams (22 types): –Applause, babycry, cheering, cough, crowd, door-slam, groan, grunt, gunshot, kiss, laugh, nose-blow, phone-ring, sniff, sniffle, snore, snort, speech, spit, throat, vocal, whistle

16. 16 Sound Data

17. 17 Effect of Background Noise Babble noise from NOISEX’92 was added to the sound events so that the resulting noisy sound events have SNR of 10dB, 5dB, 0dB, and -5dB Performance (%EER, False Acceptance = False Rejection) Perform better under matched conditions

18. 18 Effect of Sound-Event Partitioning and Fusion 2 Partitions per sound event is sufficient Score Fusion + Feature Fusion is the best

19. 19 Effect of Sound-Event Partitioning and Feature Preprocessing Having sound-event partitioning is always better PCA-Whitening and L2-norm are useful

20. 20 Conclusion Sound-event partitioning and feature pre- preprocessing methods are proposed for scream sound detection. It was found that –Having sound-event partitioning is always better –PCA-Whitening and L2-norm are useful –Score fusion + feature fusion is effective Demo

21. 21