1. 1 DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING April 23, 2009

2. 2 AGENDA Safety Permanency Well-being Family Independence

3. 3

4. 4

5. 5 RECURRENCE OF MALTREATMENT March 2008 – March 2009 National Standard= 5.4% or less

6. 6

7. 7 Lag Measure: Increase Safety Response from 65% to 95% by June 2009 657075808590959698100 Score for April 23, 2009: 97.6% Oct 76% Sep 65% Nov 75% Dec 81% Jan 92% Feb 96% Apr 97.6% Mar 97%

8. 8 Lead Measure 1: Increase Timely Completion of Investigations from 93% to 100% by June 2009 9197100 Score on April 23, 2009: 99.7% Timely 9899969294 Oct 95% Nov 91% Sept 93% Dec 93% Jan 97% Feb 98% March 99% Apr 99.7% 99.5

9. 9 NUMBER OF OVERDUE PENDING CASES April 23, 2009: 3 CASES PENDING OVERDUE REFLECTS THE NUMBER OF CASES PENDING OVERDUE AT THE END OF EACH MONTH.

10. 10 Lead Measure 2: Increase Timeliness of Responses to Reports of Abuse/Neglect from from 46% to 90% by June 2009 95 Score for April 20, 2009: 96% Timely 9085708050606540 Sep 08 46% Oct 08 57% Nov 08 59% Dec 08 70% Jan 88% Feb 95% Mar 96% 75100 Apr 96%

11. 11 PERCENTAGE OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN PENDING 31 TO 45 DAYS April 20, 2009: 15.9% OF INVESTIGATIONS HAVE BEEN PENDING 31 TO 45 DAYS GOAL

12. 12 PERCENTAGE OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN PENDING 35 TO 45 DAYS GOAL April 20, 2009: 10.9% OF INVESTIGATIONS HAVE BEEN PENDING 35 TO 45 DAYS

13. 13

14. 14 15% of investigations resulted in children coming into care in February 2009.

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17 SAFETY RESOURCES

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22

23. 23

24. 24

25. 25

26. 26

27. 27

28. 28

29. 29

30. 30

31. 31

32. 32

33. 33

34. 34

35. 35

36. 36

37. 37 PERCENT CHANGE IN NUMBER OF DAYS October 2008 to March 2009 RegionChange 118.8% 217.7% 39.6% 411.1% 520.9% 629.8% 741.9% 80.0% 95.6% 100.0% 1136.3% 1262.5% 1318.5% 1417.4% 150.0% 1622.0% 1748.8%

38. 38 NATIONAL STUDY REGARDING KINSHIP CARE  Most kinship arrangements are grandparents or other close relatives.  Kinship families are predominately families of color.  Kinship families tend to have limited income.  Kinship families have less formal contact with social workers than traditional foster care families. Source: Kinship/Relative Care; Katherine Maurer (2001).

39. 39 RELATIONSHIP OF SAFETY RESOURCE CARETAKER TO CHILD IN GEORGIA Data from SHINES

40. 40 ADVANTAGES OF KINSHIP CARE  Provides a safety net for children who might otherwise be in the foster care.  Provides children with a sense of family support.  Children have more frequent visits with birth parents and siblings.  More likely to accept sibling groups.  Maintain cultural continuity and community ties such as with school and friends.  Provides an opportunity for permanence should a child enter into legal custody of the state. Source: National Survey of America’s Families, Urban Institute (2001).  In Georgia, 30% of the children who entered care were placed with individuals who served as their Safety Resource.

41. 41 LIMITATIONS OF KINSHIP CARE  41% live in families with income less than 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL).  36% live with a caretaker without a high school degree.  55% live with a single parent.  19% live in households with four or more children. Source: Children Cared for by Relatives, Jennifer Ehrle Macomber (2001).

42. 42 LIMITATIONS CONTINUED  Less likely to receive payments and services such as training, assessments, counseling or visits from an agency.  May not meet the health and safety standards of the more regulated forms of foster care.  Many safety resources are grandparents coping with reduced income levels and increased health problems.  Un-supervised arrangement. Source: Kinship Care by Pamela Gough (2006).

43. 43 CHILDREN IN SAFETY RESOURCES 90 DAYS OR MORE BY REGION NumberPercent of Total 1157.5% 2199.5% 32110.6% 42010.1% 53417.1% 6136.5% 773.5% 82412.1% 963.0% 1052.5% 11126.0% 1200.0% 1394.5% 1442.0% 1521.0% 1642.0% 1742.0% State199

44. 44 COMPARISON OF SAFETY RESOURCE CARETAKERS BY LENGTH OF STAY: 90 DAYS OR MORE & OVERALL POPULATION OF CHILDREN IN SAFETY RESOURCES Children in safety resources for 90 days or more tend to be placed with grandparents and less likely to be with nonfamily members.

45. 45 PERMANENCY

46. 46

47. 47 REASONS CHILDREN EXITED CARE SFY2008 & SFY2009 The majority, 85%, of children left care for positive permanency reasons.

48. 48 REASONS CHILDREN EXITED CARE NATIONALLY & GEORGIA FFY 2006, SFY2008 & SFY2009

49. 49

50. 50 FOSTER CARE RE-ENTRY RATE March 2008 – March 2009 Of the children who entered care in March 2009, only 1.92% had exited care during the past 12 months. National standard: less than or equal to 8.60%

51. Child and Family Services Improvement Act of 2006 Increase the Frequency and Quality of Visits Improve Effectiveness of Frontline and Supervisory Practice Improve Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Outcomes for Children in our Care

52. 52 Federal Target At Least 90% Of Children in Care Are Visited Every Month Over 50% Of The Visits Occur In The Home Goal by Oct 1, 2011 GA’s baseline 2007 51% visited every month 82% seen in the home

53. 53 Annual State Targets Percent of children in our care who are seen every month they are in care 201190% Sustaining Accomplishment 201085% Sustaining the Effort Combating “Target Fatigue” 200971% 15+% Increase Full Engagement State Capacity to Meet New Expectations 200856% Conservative and Attainable 5+% 2007 51 % Baseline

54. 54 First Round of Data Collection YearECEM Visits ECEM VisitsIn-Home Target Actual Visits 201190 % 201085% 200971% 200856% 2007 Baseline51%82%

55. 55 Region25-Mar-0913-Apr-0917-Apr-0923-Apr-09 128.5%43.11%47.80%57.04% 234.6%46.15%46.25%47.52% 333.0%46.74%48.94%50.79% 436.8%53.02%55.66%57.11% 526.3%55.36%62.63%63.32% 626.5%44.54%45.02%45.52% 759.3%70.86%75.12%78.80% 855.7%77.75%78.73%81.36% 940.8%57.88% 1037.8%67.13%71.49%80.23% 1153.0%75.61%76.68%77.10% 1230.5%46.25%49.18%50.38% 1352.6%86.66%87.35%89.16% 1436.5%75.31%75.59%76.27% 1546.8%67.69%68.26%68.83% 1630.3%48.58%53.20%60.44% 1719.7%34.27%36.00%52.25% State37.2%58.38%60.49%64.03% Green indicates 5% or higher increase from 4/17/09.

56. 56 FIRST BASE 50% HOME 80%+ SECOND BASE 60% THIRD BASE 70% EVERY CHILD EVERY MONTH 80% BY JULY 2009! State 64% R2 47% R1 57% R17 52% R3 51% R4 57% R5 63% R6 45% R7 79% ALREADY HOME R8 (81%); R10 (80%); & R13 (89%)! R9 58% R11 77% R12 50% R14 76% R15 69% R16 60%

57. 57 REGIONNumber% 1244.2% 2295.0% 3345.9% 4447.6% 5325.5% 6457.8% 7162.8% 8183.1% 9162.8% 10213.6% 11356.1% 12386.6% 138013.9% 14315.4% 15396.8% 16244.2% 17518.8% Total577100.0% NUMBER & PERCENT OF CHILDEN AGING OUT OF CARE July 2008 – March 2009

58. 58 TIMELINE TO AGING OUT FOR CHILDREN WITH APPLA GOAL (N=978) <6 m6 to 12 m12 to 18 m18 to 24 m>24 m 212174147112333 21.7%17.8%15.0%11.5%34.0% There are a 978 children in care with Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement as a goal. Of those, 21.7% will be 18 years of age in less than 6 months.

59. 59 RegionAPPLA Children<6 m6 to 12 m12 to 18 m18 to 24 m>24 m 16991712625 2331141413 3832012 534 4831710171227 55413126716 6832210151026 73067557 832487310 93410275 445122817 1134163546 121001213141249 137315 10627 14851618141027 15441268216 41147488 175610188515 Total978212174147112333 TIMELINE TO AGING OUT FOR CHILDREN WITH APPLA GOAL BY REGION

60. 60 COUNTY DIRECTOR REVIEW RESULTS March 2009

61. 61 COMPARISON OF PEAS & COUNTY DIRECTOR REVIEWS Note: PEAS data based on review period January 2008 through December 2008 while Field Operations Review Guide for March 2009.

62. 62 TARGETING FAMILY ENGAGEMENT October 2008 & March 2009 Reviews

63. 63

64. 64

65. 65

66. 66

67. 67

68. 68

69. 69

70. 70

71. 71

72. 72

73. 73