Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona."— Presentation transcript:

1 Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona

2 Silverpit ~6 km diameter Central peak: 250 m high 750 m diameter Surrounded by >10 concentric deformation rings 2 - 10 km in diameter Formed in Cretaceous chalk above Jurassic shales 60-65 Ma

3 Silverpit (Stewart and Allen, 2002) (Allen and Stewart, 2003)

4 Objectives Understand Silverpit Ring formation Compare 2 modeling techniques to assess: Consistency Limitations Degree to which they are complementary

5 Finite-Element Method Model structure as an assemblage of elements bounded by nodes Specify: Geometry Material properties and rheologies Boundary and initial conditions Construct system of equations: Solve simultaneously for displacements at nodes Calculate stresses using constitutive equations

6 Finite-element Method: Rheology Newtonian Power-law Plastic  < c: power-law;  ≥ c: Newtonian Exponential T = temperature; R = ideal gas constant;  = viscosity; H = activation enthalpy; A, A’,  p, n = constants; c = cohesion

7 Finite-element Method: Rheology Elastic Newtonian Power-law Plastic  < c: power-law;  ≥ c: Newtonian Exponential

8 Finite-element method: Constitutive equations: E = Young’s modulus; = Poisson’s ratio;  = viscosity

9 Finite-Element Method Advantages Realistic spatial scales and timescales Simulation of variety of rheologies and geometries Spatial and temporal variation in material properties Reproduce complex structures, including faults Possible to measure credibility of solution Disadvantage Langrangian method, so significant distortion of mesh can lead to numerical instabilities

10 Lagrangian Hydrocode Method Model structure as a regular grid of cells bounded by nodes Specify: Geometry Material properties Boundary and initial conditions Calculate all forces acting on each cell. Assuming forces constant for time step, compute node displacements:

11 Lagrangian Hydrocode: Rheology Elastic Newtonian fluid flow Plastic  < Y: elastic;  ≥ Y: Newtonian Yield strength Y may be a function of pressure, pressure vibrations, damage and internal energy.

12 Hydrocode Method Advantages Realistic spatial scales and timescales Simulation of variety of rheologies and geometries Spatial and temporal variation in material properties Includes inertia Disadvantage Langrangian method, so significant distortion of mesh can lead to numerical instabilities. No built-in accuracy measure.

13 TEKTON (Finite-Element) Lagrangian Complex rheology Limited strength Faults No inertia Lagrangian Limited rheology Complex strength No faulting Inertia SALES-2 (Hydrocode)

14 TEKTON Silverpit Mesh Axisymmetric 7 km deep, 12 km wide Elements 100 m x 100 m Boundaries Center and outer: free vertically fixed horizontally Bottom: fixed vertically and horizontally

15 TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

16 Transient crater 3 km diameter Excavated in uniform mesh using the Z-model Simple case: Two materials Low viscosity Newtonian,  = 10 7 Pa s Acoustic fluidization Weak layer Power-law, A, Q, n for dolomite (Schmid et al., 1977) Constant density, Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio

17 TEKTON Silverpit Mesh

18

19

20

21

22

23 SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh Axisymmetric 4 km deep, 23.6 km wide Elements 50 m x 50 m Boundaries Center: free vertically fixed horizontally Bottom: fixed vertically free horizontally Outer: fixed vertically and horizontally

24 SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh

25 Transient crater 3 km diameter Excavated in uniform mesh using the Z-model Simple case: Two materials Low viscosity Newtonian,  = 10 7 Pa s Acoustic fluidization Weak layer Constant density, shear modulus, Poisson’s ratio

26 SALES-2 Silverpit Mesh

27

28

29

30

31

32 Results Central, near-surface, deformation differs Comparable uplift at depth, few hundred m Timescales for deformation differ Magnitudes and orientations of surface stresses outside of crater are consistent Stress orientations and consequently fault types are broadly consistent with Silverpit observations

33 TEKTON Silverpit results

34

35 SALES-2 Silverpit Results

36

37 TEKTON Silverpit Results

38

39

40


Download ppt "Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google