1. Seite 124.10.2015 Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer, Stephan Nemetz, Austrian Environment Agency EU-Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN-09 “ Implementation and Enforcement of the Environmental Acquis at National Level and Coordination of 8 Regional Twinning Projects, Phase II” Workshop on reporting obligations in the water acquis communautaire – Draft River Basin Management Plan & WISE

2. Seite 224.10.2015 Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer, Stephan Nemetz, Austrian Environment Agency EU-Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN-09 “ Implementation and Enforcement of the Environmental Acquis at National Level and Coordination of 8 Regional Twinning Projects, Phase II” RBMP 2009 / 2010 Elaboration 2007 – 2010 in Austria Harald Marent & Ernst Überreiter

3. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 3 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Structure Principles Documents Principle of the WFD and Report Structure of the Report Content for each Chapter / Reporting Data Sheets

4. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 4 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 RBMP – Principles (1) Structure follows Annex VII WFD Content because of the Reporting Data Sheets Aggregation levels: Nationwide, 3 RBD and 8 National Planning Areas All Waters (> 100 km 2 and < 100 km 2 ) are in the same maps and tables First “Draft RBMP” must be delivered to the Federal States latest by March 22 nd 2008 The RBMP is addressed to the interested Public. The language has to be “common” and “easy”.

5. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 5 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 RBMP – Principles (2) Decision in Austria: RBMP itself very short (Summary – approx. 150 – 200 pages planned) Text blocks in the RBMP should be useable (1:1) for the WISE ACCESS tool All other Information (Text and Tables): –Background Documents (e.g. Methodology, Tables) are Annexes of the RBMP. These Documents can be in a “technical language”. Maps

6. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 6 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Documents … … used to define the RBMP content WFD and the Reporting Data Sheets Gap Analysis: –Requests by the European Commission for the RBMP (Reporting Data Sheets) and the –Content of the delivered “old” WFD Reports 2004 (Article 3), 2005 (Article 5) und 2007 (Article 8). Assessment of the delivered WFD reports (Article 3 and 5) by the EC in 2007 (identified key gaps of data/information) New policies (Water Scarcity / Drought, Climate Change) Other Reports (e.g. Rhine, Elbe)

7. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 7 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Document – Preparation in the Ministry (1) “From the Big to the Small” (Top Down approach) Main Index Structure follows Annex VII WFD Detailed Index (Sub-)Chapters are closed in itself Basis of the requests (Annex VII, Reporting Data Sheets) - Table with confrontation on the Information, the EC demanded (left column) and that, column argues, on the part of Austria already reported information

8. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 8 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Document – Preparation in the Ministry (2) Table: Existing texts should be used for summaries Content defined by the ECContent already delivered by Austria and/or to be developed Info Box with proposed content a)Summary text b)Data (Tables, lists, etc.) c)Geographical Information (tables, maps, etc.) Already Delivered information by Austria (e.g. maps, tables, text information, etc.)

9. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 9 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Document – Preparation in the Ministry (3) Reporting Data Sheets -Draft Table of Contents for 2010 Reporting Guidance -Collection of Reporting Sheets for 2010 Reporting Guidance The arrangement corresponds to the arrangement of the Report The structure of the RDS follows always following pattern: What (the content) is required; Why are the contents required (indication of type. the WRRL); How (in which form) the contents are required, a)Geographical information (for example maps M 1:250.000) b)Tables / data c)Summarizing texts (maximum sign number pretended)

10. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 10 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Principle of the WFD and the Report Work and Timetable – similar to modern Management Tools 1. Analysis of the present situation 2. Objectives (goals / aims by 2015, 2021, 2027) 3. GAP Analysis: Present – Future Situation 4. Plan and take Measures to reach the objectives 5. Resources (Personal, Money, etc.) 6. Project Controlling 7. Assessment 8. Update

11. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 11 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Principle of the WFD and the Report 1.First risk analysis (Article 5) – WB at risk, not at risk -Monitoring of the Waters following WFD rules (Article 8) 2.Objectives (goals / aims by 2015, 2021, 2027) -Status of the Water Bodies 3.GAP Analysis: Present – Future Situation 4.Programme of Measures -Timetable -Costs of Measures -Priority List 5.Planning the Resources (Personal, Money, etc.) 6.Project Controlling 7.Assessment by the Member States and the European Commission 8.Update (Article 5 and 13)

12. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 12 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 The report – Index / Structure (1) IImprint II(Executive) Summary (with key results and messages) IIIIndex IVPreamble (e.g. Introduction by the Minister, etc.) 0.Summary Description of the RBMP 1.General Description / characteristics of the River Basin District 1.1 Surface Waters 1.2 Groundwater 2.Summary of significant pressures and impacts of human activity 2.1 Surface Waters 2.2 Groundwater 3.(Identification and mapping of) Protected Areas

13. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 13 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 The report – Index / Structure (2) 4.(map of the) Monitoring Networks and the results of the monitoring programs for 4.1 Surface Waters (ecological and chemical) 4.2 Groundwater (chemical and quantitative) 4.3 Protected Areas 5.Environmental Objectives established for 5.1 Surface waters 5.2 Groundwater 5.3 Protected Areas 6. Summary of the Economic Analysis of water services /uses 7. Summary of the Program or Programs of Measures (PoM) 8. Register of any more detailed programs and Management Plans for the River Basin District 9. Summary of the Public Information and Consultation and the results

14. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 14 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 The report – Index / Structure (3) 10. List of Competent Authorities 11.Contact Points and procedures for obtaining the background documentation and information 12. Management plan for “Water Scarcity and Drought” 13. “Climate Change” 14. Authors 15. Literature Other Parts of the RBMP (e.g. Annexes) - Maps - Tables - (Background) Text

15. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 15 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 The Report – OLD and New contents Main Index – most important parts / chapters Information delivered (green)  new Content (blue) 1 A general description of the characteristics of the river basin districts Art. 3 Art. 5 2Summary of significant pressures and impact of human activity Art. 5 3Protected AreasArt. 5 4map of the monitoring networks, and the results of the monitoring programs Art. 8 NEW 5list of the environmental objectivesNEW 6Summary of the economic analysis of water services Art. 5 NEW 7Programme of MeasuresNEW 8register of any more detailed programs and management plans NEW 9summary of the public information and consultation measures and their results NEW 10list of competent authoritiesArt. 3 11contact points and procedures for obtaining the background documentation and information NEW 12Management plans - Water Scarcity and Drought NEW 13Climate Change (and Water)NEW

16. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 16 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Reporting Data Sheets (1) RBMP 1 SWB 1; SWB 2; GWB 1; GWD 1 SWPI 1; SWPI 2; SWPI 3; SWPI 4; SWPI 5; SWPI 6; SWPI 7; SWPI 8; SWPI 9 GWPI 1; GWPI 2; GWPI 3; GWPI 4; GWPI 5; GWPI 6; GWPI 7; GWPI 8; GWPI 9; GWPI 10; GWPI 11 RPA 1 SWM 1; SWM 2, SWM 3 GWM 1; GWM 2 SWO 1; SWO 2 GWO 1; GWO 2 ECO 1; ECO 2 POM 1 (PP 1); CA 1

17. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 17 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Reporting Data Sheets (2) How to read the abbreviations: RBMP … River Basin Management Plan SWB... Surface Water Bodies GWB … Groundwater Bodies GWD … (Requirements of the) Groundwater Directive SWPI … Surface Waters (Bodies) Pressures and Impacts GWPI … Groundwater (Bodies) Pressures and Impacts RPA … Register of Protected Areas SWM … Surface Water (Bodies) Monitoring GWM … Groundwater (Bodies) Monitoring SWO … Surface Water (Bodies) Objectives GWO … Groundwater (Bodies) Objectives ECO … Economic (Analysis of Water Services) POM … Programme of Measures (PP … Public Participation) CA … Competent Authorities

18. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 18 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Content - Reporting Data Sheets (1) Find the Link between Content of the Report Index / Chapters Reporting Data Sheets Other Information / Documents about the RBMP Key Work in the development of the RBMP for Austria.

19. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 19 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Content - Reporting Data Sheets (2) Important development for the RBMP Statistic information on RBD and on Sub-Unit level required (for AT: Nationwide, (national part of) River Basin District level – Danube, Rhine and Elbe; Sub-Unit level – 8 national planning areas) also – detailed information asked for (e.g. abstracted volume for each point) Extra “GIS Data Sheet” developed

20. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 20 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (1) 0.Summary description of River Basin Management Plan RBMP 1 NEW for 2010 (RBD 1 Article 5 - deleted)

21. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 21 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (2) RBMP 1 – Summary description of the RBMP New Content defined by the EC – Requests: Data (e.g. in an table): Dates of publication of the timetable, work programme and consultation measures; Interim overview of significant water management issues; Draft copies of the RBMP, Final RBMP. Textual information: Summary description of the (international) river basin district and the development of the RBMP – maximum 20.000 characters Brief summary of the register of the programs and management plans for the RBD, including sub-basins, sub-units, sectors, etc. – maximum 5.000 characters RBMP – justifications (only to be completed if relevant) – 4 text parts with at least 11.000 characters Summary information about the Public Participation – maximum 5.000 characters and the assessment of experiences – maximum 2.000 characters Brief summary on the planned process of preparation of the first update of the RBMP – maximum 2.000 characters Hyperlinks to background documents

22. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 22 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (3) 1.A general description of the characteristics of the river basin districts 1.1 Surface Waters SWB 1Article 5 Report SWB 2Article 5 Report (SWB 3Article 5 Report – in SWB 1) (SWB 4Article 5 Report – deleted) 1.2 Groundwater GWB 1Article 5 Report

23. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 23 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (4) SWB 1 – Identification of Surface Water Bodies, Artificial (AWB) and Heavily Modified Water Bodies (HMWB) Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Are there new results with reference to the typology? Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps necessary? (e.g. only for small waters) Geographical Data: see GIS Data sheet Data: For each category (i.e. river, lake, coastal and transitional surface water, HMWB and AWB), number of possible types created by the typology. For each category (i.e. river, lake, coastal and transitional surface water) the number of water bodies occurring in each type in the river basin district and sub-unit. Textual Information: Typology consistent with System A or B – maximum 15.000 characters, if System B has been used provide a list of the taken factors and for HMWB/AWB and small water bodies For international RBD: coordination yes / no; yes; 5.000 characters

24. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 24 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (4a) SWB 1 – (Provisional) Identification of Artificial and Heavily Modified Water Bodies (HMWB) Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Definitive, no more temporary, identification of HMWB Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Is there a Methodology for the definitive identification existing? How and Who will identify the HMWB definitive? Small water bodies – provisional or definitive identification as HMWB? Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps necessary? (e.g. only for small waters) Remark: Austria will not finish the definition of AW and HMWB for the 1 st RBMP. Reason: We cannot “serious” identify all HMWB and AW because of less data and information. In the RBMP maps and tables: “definitive (no) HMWB/AW”, “maybe HMWB/AW”, “preliminary identification of HMWB/AW”

25. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 25 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (5) SWB 2 – Typology of surface water bodies Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps necessary? (e.g. only for small waters) Geographic Information: See GIS-Date sheet Data: Defined list in the RDS – more or less Statistic information (e.g. number or WBs, List of types) Textual Information: A brief summary of the methodology and / or criteria used to delineate surface water bodies (e.g. size, river confluence, etc.) – 5.000 characters Coordination in international RBDs given yes/no Hyperlinks to other (background) documents.

26. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 26 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (6) GWB 1 – Identification/delineation of groundwater bodies Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions:Are changes or new results to be covered in the report? Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: See GIS data sheet Data: Statistic information (e.g. number or GWBs, average area of GWBs) Textual Information: Short summaries describing the methodology used to delineate groundwater bodies (criteria) – 5.000 characters. Hyperlinks to other (background) documents.

27. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 27 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (7) 2Summary of significant pressures and impacts of human activities 2.1 Surface Waters SWPI 1 - SWPI 9Article 5 Report, updated for Article 10 Report 2.2 Groundwater GWPI 1 - GWPI 11Article 5 Report, updated for Article 10 Report

28. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 28 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (8) SWPI 1 – Summary of Pressure Types Causing Water Bodies to Fail to Reach Good Status Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Is information about “loads” possible (main Criticism point form the EC) Are these information possible for small waters? Is there a methodology for small waters? Data information: Statistic information (number of SWBs of each RBD and sub-unit) and very detailed list of pressures

29. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 29 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (9) (SWPI 2 – Identification of surface water bodies at risk) Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps foreseen? Remark: Risk analysis is finished, but Austria has to update the risk analysis for small water bodies! Geographic information: For each WB – information about the classification (risk, no risk, maybe at risk) and the reason why the WB is at risk Textual information: Methodology used for the classification of the WB.

30. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 30 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (10) SWPI 3 – Significant point source pollution on surface waters Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Are information on loads / discharges possible? Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: GIS Location of the significant sources – see GIS Data sheet Data: The estimated total number of significant point sources and of loads in the river basin district and sub units – definition of significant The percentage (number) of water bodies at risk as a result of point source pollution; Statistic information for annual loads for each significant point source Textual Information: Methodology used for identifying main point sources identified as significant – 5.000 characters

31. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 31 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (11) SWPI 4 – Significant diffuse source pollution on surface waters Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Are information on loads possible? Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet; Unique code (and location) for all WBs, affected by significant diffuse sources Data: Data should be delivered through SoE Reporting! Textual Information: Summary text - Methodology, screening criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant diffuse sources – 5.000 characters

32. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 32 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (12) SWPI 5 – Significant water abstractions from surface water Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Are information on abstractions possible? Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: on RBD and sub-unit level Number and volume for each significant abstraction point and on sub-unit level, detailed list in RDS Textual Information: Summary for Methodology, screening criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant diffuse sources – 5.000 characters

33. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 33 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (13) SWPI 6 – Significant Water Flow Regulations and Morphological Alterations Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Is the methodology differently for the small waters to that of the big one(s)? Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: No data requried Textual Information: Summary text - Methodology, screening criteria, numerical models, Pressure and impact quantification tools, State assessment tools etc. used for identifying significant diffuse sources, 5.000 characters

34. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 34 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (14) SWPI 7 – Other Pressures on Surface Waters Not Covered by Other Reporting Sheets Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions: -- Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: Statistical information (e.g. number of SWB failing good status/good potential) Textual Information: Summary text for identifying these pressures and plan of actions put in place – 10.000 characters

35. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 35 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (15) SWPI 8 – Assessment of the impacts on surface water bodies Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions: -- Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Textual Information: A summary of the main environmental impacts occurring in the RBD as a result of significant pressure may be provided on a voluntary basis – 5.000 characters A summary of the methodology used for identifying significant impacts should be provided. This should include a description of the following where appropriate: Numerical models; Quantification tools; State assessment tools; Data sources (e.g. whether existing data were used or whether data was collected specifically for the purpose); and Expert judgment – 5.000 characters

36. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 36 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (16) SWPI 9 – Uncertainties and data gaps Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Questions:Open points existing, e.g. monitoring of small water bodies Textual Information: A summary text of the main uncertainties and data gaps identified in the process since 2005 if there are still some – 5.000 characters List of uncertainties and data gaps List of planned actions to address uncertainties and data gaps

37. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 37 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (17) GWPI 1 – Summary of Pressure Types Causing Groundwater Bodies to Fail to Reach Good Status Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions: Are information on loads possible? (main criticism point from the EC) Data: Statistic data (e.g. number of water bodies in a RBD failing good status because of each pressure) Very detailed list of pressures given

38. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 38 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (18) GWPI 2 – Identification of groundwater bodies at risk Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions: Are additional maps foreseen? Remark: Risk analysis is finished and Austria will update the risk analysis if needed (e.g. splitting of one GWB)

39. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 39 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (19) GWPI 3 – Relevant point source pollution to groundwater Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents (e.g. in Austria 2 UWTP significant) Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? Are information on loads possible? (main criticism point from the EC) Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: Relevant number of point source pollution in a RBD Textual Information: Summary of Methodology, screening criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant point sources – 5.000 characters Provide a list of pollutants discharged to the groundwater bodies from the relevant point sources where thresholds have been established and, where available, an indication of the loads.

40. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 40 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (20) GWPI 4 – relevant diffuse source pollution in groundwater Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? Are information on loads possible? (main criticism point from the EC) Geographic Information: see GIS Data sheet Data: No data required Textual Information: Summary text - Methodology, screening criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant diffuse sources – 5.000 characters Provide a list of pollutants discharged to the groundwater bodies from the relevant diffuse sources where thresholds have been established and, where available, an indication of the loads.

41. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 41 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (22) GWPI 5 – relevant groundwater Abstractions Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? Are information on abstractions possible? (main criticism point from the EC) Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: Number and volume for each significant abstraction point, detailed list in RDS Water balance (e.g. WEI) Textual Information: Summary text of Methodology and the criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant water abstractions – 5.000 characters

42. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 42 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (23) GWPI 6 – relevant artificial Groundwater Recharge Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: Number and volume for each significant groundwater recharge and per RBD Textual Information: Summary text – update 2005 information; Methodology, screening criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant water abstractions – 5.000 characters

43. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 43 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (24) GWPI 7 – relevant saltwater or other intrusion Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents (e.g. for Austria not relevant) Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? Is there new knowledge about this point? Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: No data required Textual Information: Summary text – update 2005 information; Methodology, screening criteria, models etc. used for identifying significant water abstractions, Reasons of saltwater or other intrusion and Definition of other intrusion – 5.000 characters

44. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 44 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (25) GWPI 8 – Other Pressures on Groundwater not covered by Other Reporting Sheets Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents (e.g. for Austria not relevant) Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? (the further characterisation was a main criticism point from the EC) Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: No data required Textual Information: Brief summary of the methodology used to identify the other relevant pressures and of the plan of actions to be put in place to identify the unknown pressures – 10.000 characters

45. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 45 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (26) GWPI 9 – Summary Assessment of the Human Impacts on Groundwater Bodies Content already submitted in Article 5 Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Data: No data required Textual Information: At a minimum a short summary of the main impacts occurring in the RBD as a result of significant pressures should be provided – 5.000 characters including –Anthropogenic alterations of the level of groundwater leading to significant diminution of the ecological and qualitative status of associated surface water bodies; –Chemical composition of groundwater leading to significant diminution of the ecological and qualitative status of associated surface water bodies.

46. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 46 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (27) GWPI 10 – Further characterisation - Assessment of the human impacts on groundwater bodies Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents (e.g. for Austria not relevant) Questions:Are additional maps foreseen? Is there new knowledge about this point? Textual Information: A brief summary should be provided on the methodology and characteristics assessed in the further characterisation of groundwater bodies – 5.0000 characters

47. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 47 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (28) GWPI 11 – Uncertainties and data gaps Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions:Open points existing? Textual Information: A summary text of the main uncertainties and data gaps identified in the process since 2005 if there are still some – 5.000 characters List of uncertainties and data gaps List of planned actions to address uncertainties and data gaps

48. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 48 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (29) 3.Register of Protected Areas RPA 1Article 5 Report

49. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 49 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (30) RPA 1 – Register of protected areas Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report contents Questions:Are additional maps needed (e.g. map with Nature 2000 areas for Austria) Geographic Information: See GIS Data sheet Textual Information: A list of any legislation identifying additional national, regional or local water related protected areas other than those identified in EU legislation

50. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 50 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (31) 4Monitoring Networks and the results of the monitoring programs for 4.1 Surface Water Bodies SWM 1Article 8 Report SWM 2Article 8 Report SWM 3NEW for 2010 4.2 Groundwater Bodies GWM 1Article 8 Report GWM 2NEW for 2010

51. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 51 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (32) SWM 1 – Summary of the Surface Water Monitoring Programs; surveillance and operational Content already submitted in Article 8 Summary and Update of the Article 8 report contents Common treatment of big and small water bodies (e.g. common maps) Qustions:Identification of the Monitoring programs and –networks for small waters? Methodology for the monitoring of small waters (Grouping)? Are additional maps foreseen? Geographic Information: Information for each monitoring site – detailed list in the RDS Data: Statistic information (No of sites, starting date of the monitoring, monitored substances) Textual Information: 8 text chapters with maximum 2.000 characters for each chapter (e.g. methodology to identify sites, sampling, frequencies, etc.) Hyperlinks to background documents

52. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 52 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (33) SWM 2 – Surface Water Investigative Monitoring Programme Content already submitted in Article 8 Summary and Update of the Article 8 report contents Data: Statistical information (which QE is monitored; No of sites; Type of programme) Textual Information: Summary of investigative monitoring strategy, where investigative monitoring has already taken place - maximum 5.000 characters Summary to illustrate how the strategy works – maximum 2.000 characters Hyperlinks to background documents

53. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 53 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (34) SWM 3 – Results of surface water monitoring programmes (status of surface water bodies) New Content defined by the EC Geographic Information - 8 maps requested: Map 1: Ecological status class of natural water bodies including data at a water body level, on which BQEs the assessment is based; Map 2: Ecological potential class for HMWB - MS should specify BQE concerned (default setting "unknown potential" is applied if no class and BQE-specific data are provided); Map 3: Status for protected areas – if not, specify reasons for failure (if reported for other Directives (e.g. Bathing Waters, Nitrates, Habitats etc.) this information will not need to be reported again. Reporting will be required for Article 7 protected areas as these are not defined under any other Directive); Map 4: Achievement / exceedance of EQS for heavy metals out of list of Priority Substances; Map 5: Achievement / exceedance of EQS for pesticides out of list of Priority Substances; Map 6: Achievement / exceedance of EQS for industrial pollutants out of list of Priority Substances; Map 7: Achievement / exceedance of EQS for other pollutants out of list of Priority Substances; Map 8: Achievement / exceedance of EQS for other (national) pollutants.

54. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 54 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (34a) SWM 3 – Results of surface water monitoring programmes (status of surface water bodies) New Content defined by the EC Textual Information: Comments to assist the interpretation of the Geographic data should be supplied Hyperlinks to background documents Question: Is there a methodology to define the Status of a Water Body because of monitoring results? Remark: To elaborate the 8 maps – need for an table for each water body and the status!

55. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 55 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (35) GWM 1 – Summary of Monitoring Programme for Groundwater (Quantitative and Chemical Status) Content already submitted in Article 8 Summary and Update of the Article 8 report contents Geographic Information: Information for each monitoring site – detailed list in the RDS Data: Statistic information (No of sites, starting date of the monitoring, monitored parameters) Textual Information: 6 text chapters with maximum 2.000 characters for each chapter (e.g. methodology to identify sites, sampling, frequencies, etc.) Hyperlinks to background documents

56. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 56 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (36) GWM 2 – Results of groundwater monitoring programmes (status of groundwater bodies) New Content defined by the EC Geographic Information – 5 maps requested: Map 1: Achievement / exceedance of good quantitative status; Map 2: Achievement / exceedance of “good chemical status” for nitrates (value in Annex 1 of GWD, status assessment procedure in Article 4 of GWD); Map 3: Achievement / exceedance of “good chemical status” for pesticides (combined total and individual value in Annex 1 of GWD, status assessment procedure in Article 4 of GWD); Map 4: Achievement / exceedance of “good chemical status” based on national thresholds for other pollutants (selected from a minimum number of substances as listed in Annex II of GWD, status assessment procedure in Article 4 of GWD); Map 5: Identification of groundwater bodies for which a significant and sustained upward trend has been identified (noting the relevant pollutant(s) causing the trend).

57. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 57 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (36a) GWM 2 – Results of groundwater monitoring programmes (status of groundwater bodies) New Content defined by the EC Textual information: Summary text of the description of the methodology for assessing “groundwater status classes” in water bodies – maximum 5.000 characters A brief summary for transboundary water bodies of how co-ordination has been achieved – maximum 5.000 characters Hyperlink to background documents

58. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 58 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (37) 5 Environmental Objectives 5.1 Surface waters SWO 1NEW for 2010 SWO 2NEW for 2010 5.2 Groundwater GWO 1NEW for 2010 GWO 2NEW for 2010 5.3 Protected Areas no Reporting Data Sheet developed

59. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 59 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (38) SWO 1 – System for classification for surface waters New Content defined by the EC Data: For each surface water type and relevant quality elements - status/potential class boundaries Textual Information: Brief summary of the methodology used to determine the quality elements and the class boundaries for natural waters – maximum 2000 characters Brief summary of the methodology used to determine the quality elements and the class boundaries for artificial and heavily modified water bodies – maximum 2.000 characters Brief summary of the methodology used to combine quality elements to define the final status class – maximum 2.000 characters Brief summary of the methodology to assess the “no deterioration” objective (Art. 4.1.a). The information should demonstrate on how the assessment is carried out (including: baseline, trend analysis etc.) – maximum 5.000 characters Remark: AT is very unhappy with Table 1 respectively the information asked for – Interpretation

60. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 60 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (38a) SWO 1 - Table 1

61. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 61 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (38b) SWO 1 – “Reporting on specific initiatives and management objectives for surface waters” New Content defined by the EC Settting of operational management objectives for nutrient load, and connectivity Geographic Information: Maps requested for nutrient load and for connectivity – content not especially defined Data: The RBD (code); The sub-unit (code); For nutrient load (if objectives set) the current nutrient load, the target nutrient load for the sub-unit (for 2015) and the load reduction required for the impacted groups of water bodies The RBD (code); The sub-unit (code); For connectivity (if objectives set), current status of connectivity of the sub-unit (yes, no, partial). This question should be answered for 2009, 2015, 2021, 2027 and the target date by which the sub-unit will be connected to the river network. Textual Information: A textual summary of what measures are being put in place to achieve this (e.g. dam removal and target dates)

62. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 62 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (39) SWO 2 – Use of exemptions in surface waters (maps with exemptions of the objectives by 2015) New Content defined by the EC Geographic Information: Maps for exemptions based on surface water bodies by quality element (level 2)and the target class, which illustrates the envisaged/agreed objective for 2015 Data: The percentage of water bodies per sub-unit where each exemption applies and the main justifications for each exemption and the quality elements concerned. Statistics on the water bodies where an exemption applies under Article 4(4-7) and the justification for the exemption (Table 1) Textual Information: Summary of the general national or river basin district approach on methodology used to determine where the exemption provisions of Article 4 (4-7) should apply – maximum 5.000 characters Information on the specific dates identified for deadlines to be met – maximum 2.000 characters

63. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 63 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (39a) SWO 2 – Table 1

64. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 64 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (40) GWO 1 – Classification systems established for groundwater New Content defined by the EC Data: For each ground water body or group of bodies, the following should be reported the environmental objective, quality element and class boundaries Textual Information: Brief summary of the methodology used to determine the quality elements and the class boundaries for natural waters – maximum 2000 characters Brief summary of the methodology used to determine the quality elements and the class boundaries for artificial and heavily modified water bodies – maximum 2.000 characters Brief summary of the methodology used to combine quality elements to define the final status class – maximum 2.000 characters Brief summary of the methodology to assess the “no deterioration” objective (Art. 4.1.a). The information should demonstrate on how the assessment is carried out (including: baseline, trend analysis etc.) – maximum 5.000 characters

65. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 65 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (40a) GWO 1 – Table 1 Quality element (QE) or Parameter National method in use Reporting unitsGood – poor boundary status or Threshold values Quantitative status … Chemical status - Conductivity - Pollutant 1* - Pollutant 2* - etc * … Pollutants to selected from a minimum number of substances as listed in Annex II of the GWD

66. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 66 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (41) GWO 2 – Use of exemptions in groundwater bodies (maps with exemptions of the objectives by 2015) New Content defined by the EC Geographic Information: Maps for exemptions based on groundwater water bodies by quality element and the target class, which illustrates the envisaged/agreed objective for 2015 Data: The percentage of water bodies per sub-unit where each exemption applies and the main justifications for each exemption and the quality elements concerned. Statistics on the water bodies where an exemption applies under Article 4(4-7) and the justification for the exemption (Table 1) Textual Information: Summary of the general national or river basin district approach on methodology used to determine where the exemption provisions of Article 4 (4-7) should apply (if different to the methodology applied for surface water bodies) – maximum 5.000 characters Information on the specific dates identified for deadlines to be met – maximum 2.000 characters For transboundary water bodies a brief summary of how co-ordination has been achieved – maximum 5.000 characters

67. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 67 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (41a) GWO 2 – Table 1

68. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 68 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (42) 6.Summary of the Economic Analysis of water services ECO 1Article 5 Report, update ECO 2New for 2010

69. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 69 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (43) ECO 1 – Economic Analysis, Update Content already submitted in Article 5 Summary and Update of the Article 5 report content Questions: Are there new information for this point available Fulfil the requests for 2010 contents Data: Volumes abstracted/discharged per water service. Total cost of investments for water supply and water demand in Euro / year (2009 to 2015). Costs of water service (Euro/m3), with an indication if ERC are included or not and the share they have in the overall costs. Level of cost recovery in % per water service. Water prices per water user in Euro/m3. Which approaches have been taken to fulfil the requirement of Annex III (b) “to make judgements about the most cost-effective combination of measures in respect of water uses to be included in the programme of measures under Article 11 based on estimates of the potential costs of such measures. Remark: Contents of 2010 are not yet agreed by the Member States!

70. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 70 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (43a) ECO 1 – Economic Analysis, Update Content already submitted in Article 5 Textual Information: How the definition water services is applied in practice; Summary of the methodology and the criteria used for calculating the cost recovery rate, including a statement on how environmental and resource costs were considered and estimated; Summary how the issues of cross-subsidies are handled in under cost recovery. Approach to estimate the costs of future investments, as well as how the baseline scenario has been considered/developed; For international RBDs, has there been any coordination of economic analysis (<2000 characters); For international RBDs, have the judgement of cost effectiveness of measures been coordinated? If yes, provide reference. If no, please provide additional explanations (<2000 characters) Summary on how the economic analyses has been considered when making judgement about cost effectiveness of measures Gaps in information identified that could not be closed since 2005 and planned additional data collection to fill gaps for the second implementation cycle. If necessary - Explain the 2005 economic analysis

71. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 71 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (44) ECO 2 – Summary of steps and measures taken to meet the requirements of Article 9 Content already submitted in Article 5 Textual Information: 7 text summaries – each 5.000 characters, e.g.: Summary on the planned steps towards implementing Art 9.1 that will contribute to achieving the environmental objectives of this Directive (Art 9.2). Where applicable, what are the reasons for not fully applying paragraph 1, second sentence, to be reported in the River Basin Management Plans (Art. 9.4). How has the MS ensured that “water-pricing policies provide adequate incentives for users to use water resources efficiently, thereby contributing to the environmental objectives of the Directive” (Article 9 (1))? How has the MS ensured “an adequate contribution of the different water uses to the recovery of the costs of water services following the polluter pays principle”? How is the polluter pays principle taken into account? Any problems encountered in data collection or methodology used. Gaps in information identified and planned additional data collection to fill gaps.

72. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 72 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (45) 7.Programme of Measures POM 1NEW for 2010

73. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 73 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46) POM 1 – Summary of steps and measures taken to meet the requirements of Article 11 New Content defined by the EC Data: Data on Basic measures (Article 11(3)(a) and (b-l)), Data on Supplementary measures (Article 11(4)) and Additional Measures (Article 11 (5)) Tables 1 to 3 Textual Information: For international RBDs, have the measures been coordinated (in accordance to Art. 11 (1)? “YES/NO”. If yes, provide reference. If no, please provide additional explanations – maximum 2.000 characters If necessary, additional comments may be introduced to explain the data and information provided earlier including comments on table 4 (cost of measures), 5.000 characters Hyperlinks to other (background) documents Remark to Table 3a and 3b: What are supplementary / additional measures?

74. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 74 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46a) POM 1 – Table 1

75. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 75 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46b) POM 1 – Table 2

76. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 76 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46c) POM 1 – Summary of steps and measures taken to meet the requirements of Article 11 – Supplementary / Additional Measures Table 3a: Surface Waters and Groundwater

77. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 77 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46d) POM 1 – Table 3b, Surface Waters and Groundwater

78. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 78 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46e) POM 1 – Summary of steps and measures taken to meet the requirements of Article 11/6 – Marine waters New Content defined by the EC Remark - proposal: No Reporting Data Sheets or Content established for this content. It could be useful to give information in Textual form. The measures to protect the marine environment should be a part of the report. Annex VII: 7.11. Details of the measures taken to avoid increase in pollution of marine waters in accordance with Article 11(6); Article 11/6: In implementing measures pursuant to paragraph 3, Member States shall take all appropriate steps not to increase pollution of marine waters. Without prejudice to existing legislation, the application of measures taken pursuant to paragraph 3 may on no account lead, either directly or indirectly to increased pollution of surface waters. This requirement shall not apply where it would result in increased pollution of the environment as a whole.

79. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 79 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46f) POM 1 – Costs of measures (per Member State or RBD as available) New Content defined by the EC Data: Cost of measures and/or programs of measures; Aggregation levels – Member State or RBD Table 4 Textual Information: Additional comments may be introduced to explain the data and information provided earlier including comments on table 4, cost of measures – maximum 5.000 characters. Hyperlinks to other (background) documents Remark: Costs for one year or for one Management Cycle? What are supplementary and additional measures?

80. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 80 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (46g) POM 1 – Cost of measures Table 4

81. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 81 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (47) 9. Public Participation / Information and Consultation PP 1no Reporting Data Sheet for 2010 developed, content can be taken from RBMP 1

82. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 82 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (48) PP 1 – Public Participation / Information and Consultation New Content defined by the EC Proposal: A possible content was written in reporting data sheet “RBMP” Textual Information: Summary information about the Public Participation process – maximum 5.000 characters, and the experiences with the PP process – maximum 2.000 characters Hyperlinks to background documents

83. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 83 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (49) 10. List of Competent Authorities CA 1Article 3 Report no new Reporting Data Sheet for 2010 developed

84. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 84 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (50) CA 1 – List of Competent Authorities Content already submitted in Article 3 Data: Address for CA for each River Basin District Textual Information: legal status of each competent authority institutional relationships established in order to ensure co-ordination national and if river basin district covers the territory of more than one Member State core responsibilities of the relevant for each RBD Remarks: Austria submitted information of the CA for the first two levels of the Administrative hierarchy, the Ministry level and the Federal States Level – no changes foreseen The contents of the Article 3report was not only a list of CA. It was also a list of the Role of competent authorities specific to the Water Framework Directive in the River Basin District (legal aspects)!

85. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 85 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (51) GIS Data requirements GIS 1Article 13 summarised and updated out of Article 3, 5, 8 and 13 Reports

86. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 86 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (52) GIS – Geographical Information Requirements and Water Body Attributes Content already submitted in Article 3, 5, 8 and New for 2010 Principles for Data transfer: GML files or as ESRI shape files Electronic reporting through WISE – Reportnet No min./max. aggregating Scale foreseen Information Details: River Basin District level Sub Basin Level Water Body Level Protected Area Level Detailed list of attributes requested

87. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 87 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Chapters - Reporting Data Sheets (63) 12 Additional Chapter – Water Scarcity and Drought 13 Additional Chapter – Climate Change 14 List of Authors and Project Members 15 Literature

88. Workshop RBMP / Bucharest Page 88 November, 06 th -07 th 2007 Questions?