Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Speaking Power to Truth? Evidence- Based Policy and the Politics of Housing in the UK Keith Jacobs University of Tasmania Tony Manzi University of Westminster.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Speaking Power to Truth? Evidence- Based Policy and the Politics of Housing in the UK Keith Jacobs University of Tasmania Tony Manzi University of Westminster."— Presentation transcript:

1 Speaking Power to Truth? Evidence- Based Policy and the Politics of Housing in the UK Keith Jacobs University of Tasmania Tony Manzi University of Westminster

2 What is Evidence-Based Policy (EBP)? Comprehensive Analysis Systematic Review Framework for Evaluation Justification for Reform

3 What Claims are Made for EBP? ‘Robust’ framework Effective use of Research Rationale for Intervention Objective and scientific basis for change

4 Why is EBP so Popular? ‘Concrete factual realism’ and ‘unvarnished verisimilitude’ (Hood and Jackson) Post-ideology Epistemic legitimisation ‘Retreat from priesthood’ New ICTs Complexity of policy environment Coalition government and post-bureaucracy

5 The Research Context The Utilitarian Turn Instrumentalism – Academic rent-seeking? Contract research and commodification

6 Housing and Professional Practice Pragmatism – ‘In Business for Neighbourhoods’ Best Practice – Customer care and marketing ‘What matters is what works’ – Additionality

7 Additionality (Source: BIS, 2009) Gross outputs/outcomes Deadweight: benefits that would have been secured without intervention Displacement: reduced outputs elsewhere within target area Leakage: benefits occurring outside target area Substitution: e.g. replacing existing worker with jobless person Multipliers: provision of further economic activity (e.g. jobs, expenditure, income) Crowding in/out: expenditure causes other economic adjustments Unintended consequences: unanticipated and adverse (non-targeted) effects Net additional outputs/outcomes

8 Calculating Additionality (Source: English Partnerships, 2009) A1 [G1 x (1-L) x (1-Dp) x (1-S) x M] – [G1* x (1-L*) x (1-Dp*) x (1-S*) x M*] Where: AI = Net additional impact GI = Gross impact L = Leakage Dp = Displacement S= Substitution M = Multiplier * Denotes reference case (and hence deadweight)

9 Conceptual Framework Managerialism – Competition, Incentivisation, Disaggregation Modernisation – Participation and partnership Ideological Change – ‘Regime of truth’ (Foucault) – Privatisation and neoliberalism

10 Managerialism Best Value – Use of ‘piloting’ – ‘Exemplifying rather than experimenting’ – use of ‘trail blazer’ authorities HMRP ‘Pathfinder’ programme – Primacy of markets – Demolition – Role of academics and consultants

11 Modernisation – the NDC Programme Community-based strategy Holistic approach Evidence to win bids – e.g. deprivation etc Extensive evaluation – ex post, ex ante

12 Ideology - Evidence for Welfare Reform Stigmatisation of social housing and shaping behaviour Consultation document - Housing system ‘not working’ (CLG, 2010) due to: – Worklessness – Lack of mobility – Inflexibility – Poorly targeted subsidy – Inefficiency

13 Proposals for Welfare Reform (2012) ‘The answer to the problem is fundamentally a local one’ (CLG, p.15) Deregulation Subsidy restrictions – ‘affordable’ rents and self-financing Local authority autonomy: – Homelessness – Waiting list – Security of tenure

14 Conclusions The limitations of evidence The interdependence of power and knowledge Rhetoric and reaction in housing policy Discourse as justification Primarily political/ideological strategy – Claims of impartiality/rationality Combination of managerialism, modernisation and ideology


Download ppt "Speaking Power to Truth? Evidence- Based Policy and the Politics of Housing in the UK Keith Jacobs University of Tasmania Tony Manzi University of Westminster."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google