Presentation on theme: "Research Methods Using Kolb/Gowin Model"— Presentation transcript:
1Research Methods Using Kolb/Gowin Model Jon SimonThe University of HullBMAF Teaching/Research GrantFunds to visit 5 universities – staff workshops
2Uses of the Kolb/Gowin Model? Helps students:Develop their own research proposals.Summarise and understand empirical research papers.Structure their own research projects.Assumption: project involves collection & analysis of data, but can be adapted to a critical thinking or report writing model.
3What is the Kolb/Gowin Model? See handout of model pro-forma.Word templeteWhy base on Kolb? One of the best known learning theories. Central role of experience. Student cover in Study Skills Module. Effective learning involves all 4 stages. Individuals preferences for stages – Learning Style Inventory. Inductive & deductive approaches built in.Components mainly from Gowin’s Vee but some from Paul’s Critical Thinking Model.Example of its use to summarize a published paper – see Shelton’s auditing paper handout.Example of its use to prepare a research proposal – see my accounting probability proposal.
4Introducing Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory Covered in first year skills modules.When you buy new mobile phone. How do you go about using it?Base your understanding on your last phone as they can’t be that different.Watch other people with a similar phone.Read the instruction manual in detail to see what it can do.Read the quick start guide and work the rest out for yourself.From Kolb’s web site
6Validity Do all the components fit to tell a clear consistent story. Internal & external validity.
7How has the Model been used? Second year undergraduates research methods module – assessment is a student research proposal & presentation – see examples in handouts.MBA students – assessment is a student research proposal & to be used a entrance to an e-based blended learning site.PhD student – preparation for Viva.
8Two Examples of Student’s Work See handout - can you evaluate each?
9Potential Advantages Builds upon study skills module. Research project / proposal summarized on one side of A4.Helps students see how knowledge has to be constructed.Scaffolding or framework upon which to construct knowledge.Aides communication & (self) review. Highlights misunderstandings.Focuses attention on key research issues or components which need addressing in ANY research project (checklist).Omissions sometimes obvious.Can see quickly the strengths and weaknesses of a proposal/project.Stresses importance of the logical interconnection between these issues (i.e. Validity).Facilitates discussion of philosophical issues.
11How can the Model be Introduced? Involve students in collecting own data – based on Novak & Gowin (1984) – see later slides and handout.
12Do students like the Model? Quantitative Evaluation Second year undergraduate accounting & finance students on a research methods module: Age: Under 22 71% % Over 24 4% Gender: Male 66% Female 34% Home Country: UK 38% Other European 11% China /SE Asia 44% Other 7%
13Quantitative Evaluation How useful did you find the Kolb Research Methods Model in Preparing Your Research Proposal? (n=56)Very Useful %Quite Useful %Undecided %Of Little Use %Of No Use %
14Quantitative Evaluation How useful did you find the Kolb Research Methods Model in Summarizing a Research Paper? (n=56)Very Useful %Quite Useful %Undecided %Of Little Use %Of No Use %
15Quantitative Evaluation The Model provided me with an understanding of the nature of knowledge and how it might be created (n=58) Strongly agree 11% Agree 72% Neutral / Undecided 12% Disagree 5% Strongly disagree 0%
16Quantitative Evaluation The Model reminded me to undertake effective reflection in preparing my research proposal (n=57) Strongly agree 19% Agree 63% Neutral / Undecided 16% Disagree 2% Strongly disagree 0%
17Quantitative Evaluation The Purpose component in the Model was useful in getting me to think about why I am preparing the research proposal (n=58) Strongly agree 38% Agree 43% Neutral / Undecided 12% Disagree 7% Strongly disagree 0%
18Quantitative Evaluation The Model provides a good way of visualizing the research process (n=58)Strongly agree %Agree %Neutral / Undecided %Disagree %Strongly disagree %
19Quantitative Evaluation The need to complete the Objects/Events component was useful in getting my research proposal started by forcing me to identify the key aspects of my topic (n= 57)Strongly agree %Agree %Neutral / Undecided %Disagree %Strongly disagree %
20Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in stopping me jumping into the project without sufficient reflection (n=57)Strongly agree %Agree %Neutral / Undecided %Disagree %Strongly disagree %
21Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in planning my research proposal (n=57) Strongly agree 30% Agree 51% Neutral / Undecided 16% Disagree 3% Strongly disagree 0%
22Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in providing a structure for my research proposal (n=57) Strongly agree 32% Agree 53% Neutral / Undecided 14% Disagree 2% Strongly disagree 0%
23Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me know where particular research topics / lectures / readings fitted into the research process (n=57) Strongly agree 16% Agree 32% Neutral / Undecided 37% Disagree 12% Strongly disagree 3%
24Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me know what to include and exclude in my research proposal (n=57) Strongly agree 14% Agree 49% Neutral / Undecided 21% Disagree 12% Strongly disagree 4%
25Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me prepare the research proposal in allotted time (n= 56) Strongly agree 4% Agree 52% Neutral / Undecided 29% Disagree 14% Strongly disagree 2%
26Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me identifying an appropriate conceptual / theoretical framework for my research proposal (n= 55) Strongly agree 9% Agree 60% Neutral / Undecided 13% Disagree 16% Strongly disagree 2%
27Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me identifying an appropriate methodology for my research proposal (n=56) Strongly agree 112% Agree 43% Neutral / Undecided 23% Disagree 18% Strongly disagree 4%
28Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me identify relevant literature for my research proposal (n=57) Strongly agree 12% Agree 33% Neutral / Undecided 26% Disagree 27% Strongly disagree 2%
29Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me summarize and analysis literature for my research proposal (n=57) Strongly agree 21% Agree 42% Neutral / Undecided 30% Disagree 7% Strongly disagree 0%
30Quantitative Evaluation The Model was useful in helping me present and communicate my research proposal to others (n=57) Strongly agree 21% Agree 47% Neutral / Undecided 23% Disagree 9% Strongly disagree 0%
31Quantitative Evaluation How useful did you find the Ws (What, Who, When Where, How Many, How and Why) in Preparing Your Research Proposal? (n= 57)Very useful %Quite useful %Undecided %Of little use %Of no use %
32Do students like the Model? Qualitative Evaluation RankPlease state the one thing you most liked about the Model%Examples of student responses1Provides a useful structure38Organized method of decomposing research.It helped me break down my research topic and allowed me to concentrate on only the relevant information I needed.I like the fact of the different headings which helped to break the research down into the categories.2Helps thinking about the research process16It got me thinking outside the brackets.It makes you think about your project in stages-allows you to break it down into sections.UnderstandableEasy to understand4Specific components145Comprehensive12It was easier continuing with topic once identified all parts.Makes you address all issues6Focused attention on empirical aspects of the research processThis lead me to get the primary research for the proposal.The 5 WsBreakdown of the 5 Ws
33Do students like the Model? Qualitative Evaluation RankPlease state the one thing you most disliked about the Model%Examples of student responses1Specific components, particularly the abstract conceptual components and worldview.37%e.g. categories/constructs box, theories.2Difficult and complex to apply23%Hard to fill in all the sections.Choosing which part of the research covers which category.3Takes too long12%Tedious, annoying and time consuming.4Some components are too similar to differentiate7%Is very similar between the purpose and some parts of objects/events.Too restrictingCannot fit a lot of information on.6Not convinced all components are necessary5%Is it necessary to fill in each box.7Not suitable for all topics2%Not suitable for every topic.8Kolb’s learning cycleThe learning diagram in the middle.9Did not help me make research decisions.Did not help me choose a topic or decide what data analysis to use.10RepetitiveSome headings require repetitive information being put in.
34Student Problems Preparing Research Methods Proposals / Projects Student problems can be categorized around the four stages of Kolb’s Model andIn some cases the Kolb/Gowin Model may help?So what problems have your students encountered in research modules associated with Concrete Experience?
35Problems associated with Concrete Experience Not being able to select a topic.Asking if a certain topic is good.Asking if a Topic A is better/worse than Topic B.Failing to clearly specify their chosen event / object – I suggest using: What, Where, Who, When, How Many.
36What problems have your students encountered in research modules associated with Reflective Observation?
37Problems associated with Reflective Observation Not seeing that they need to develop a research topic that suits them (Sun & Lin, 2004, 155).Jumping into a project without sufficient reflection.Choosing an event that has not yet happened.Insufficiently focused research questions.Attempting to answer too many and/or unrelated research questions.Worrying they need to make a major contribution to knowledge.Being unrealistic in what they can do in the allotted time (Collis & Hussey, 2003).
38What problems have your students encountered in research modules associated with Abstract Conceptualization?
39Problems associated with Abstract Conceptualization Not recognizing that all research builds upon the work of others.Failing to identify an appropriate conceptual / theoretical framework (Collis & Hussey, 2003).Not identifying /using relevant literature (Collis & Hussey, 2003).Not defining key concepts.Poor citation / referencing.Not knowing how to summarize literature.Not knowing how to evaluate literature.Not recognizing that all research is value laden (Kuhn, 1962).
40What problems have your students encountered in research modules associated with Active Experimentation?
41Problems associated with Active Experimentation Suggesting inappropriate research methods to collect data (Collis & Hussey, 2003).Talking about possibly appropriate research methods but not saying how they are related to their specific topic.Not recognising there may be significant problems getting access to data.Recognising such access problems but failing to come up with plausible strategies to get access.Not understanding and seeing the relevance of various philosophical ideas to underpin their data collection.Not knowing what type of data to collect.Not knowing how much data to collect or suggesting unrealistic sample sizes.Presenting an unrealistic variety of data collection methods.Not identifying appropriate participants.
42More Problems associated with Active Experimentation Not considering ethical and political issues.Being vague about, or suggesting incompatible, ways of analysing data.Thinking they need to prove causation.Not knowing how to report results.Poor layout of Tables & Figures.Not relating results to previous research studies.Poor interpretation and discussion of findings for stakeholdersPoor recommendations.Over generalisation of results.Limitations of results not considered.Areas for future research not considered.
43Other Student Problems related to Overall Structure Being unable to distinguish a research project from a critical thinking exercise or a Report.Not knowing the difference between a proposal and a project.Not understanding the fit between theory and research methods – internal validity.Not knowing how to structure their project.Not knowing what to include and exclude (Collis & Hussey, 2003).
44Developments in HandDiagnostic questionnaire to identify issues students may find problematic in preparing research projects/proposals, based on Kolb’s Learning Styles Inventory.Can be used to help students prepare / understand reports.Can be adapted to help students prepare a critical thinking piece of work e.g. An extended essay. Based on Richard Paul’s critical thinking components – replace active experiment components (i.e. Data collection, analysis, results and recommendations) with reasons, assertion and consequences components.Being used the structure for an e-learning MBA research methods module.
45INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH A LEARNING TASK 5 SLIDES WILL FOLLOW WHICH WILL BE SHOWN FOR 10 SECONDS. YOU CAN WRITE NOTHING DURING THE 10 SECONDSTHEN YOU HAVE TO WRITE DOWN AS MANY ITEMS AS YOU CAN REMEMBER
46INTRODUCTION TO THE VEE LEARNING TASK 1 How much of the following can you remember after 10 seconds exposure.
58Introduction to Research Methods Objects/Events:Some selected part of the (Financial Reporting) world.For example = Financial statements, internet, auditors, investors, managers, accountants, standard setters, accounting standards, employees, governments, etc.Natural starting point of any investigation.Careful observation and full detailed description needed.
59Introduction to Research Methods Purpose or contribution:Who will benefit from the research?Why was the research undertaken?
60Introduction to Research Methods Focus Questions:Need to ask clear questions about chosen objects/events.Much reflection needed.Often asks WHY?
61Introduction to Research Methods Worldview:What are the researcher’s beliefs?For example, positivist or interpretist, concern with inflation, the environment, unfairness in society?All research is ‘value laiden’.Paradigm (Kuhn)
62Introduction to Research Methods Concepts:Identify concepts to help understand selected objects/events.Ideas / basic building blocks of knowledge.For example, profit, assets, accruals, capital, replacement cost, etc.This is how a subject expert thinks and see the world.Need to be Cited and Referenced
63Introduction to Research Methods Constructs:The way concepts are linked to other concepts clarifies their meaning.For example, companies with profit based bonus schemes report higher profits.Need to be Cited and Referenced
64Introduction to Research Methods Theories:Linked concepts to help us explain, predict or guide some part of the FR world.Can be tested against real world data.Real world too complex & messy; theory = simplification.Can measure extent of relationship (e.g. CAPM).Need to be Cited and ReferencedInduction & Deduction
65Introduction to Research Methods Assumptions:Upon which concepts / theory rests needed to be clearly stated.For example, choice of depreciation methods.
66Introduction to Research Methods Data Collection:Data the researcher chooses to gather concerning your selected objects / events.Can be quantitative or qualitative. From whom?Questionnaire, Interview, Observation, Examining Documents.Survey experiments, case study. Ethical issues.
67Introduction to Research Methods Analysis: To produce results.For qualitative data, such techniques as coding.For quantitative data tables, graphs or statistics might be relevant.The problem of Induction = Falsification (Popper).
68Introduction to Research Methods Results: Called knowledge claims.For example, 50% of respondents chose straight-line depreciation.Are your results similar or different from those made by other researchers?
69Introduction to Research Methods Recommendations & Implications:Often called Discussion or Recommendations Section.Who does the research benefit?For example standard setters, accountants, auditors, other researchers, etc.Weaknesses/limitations in the results.Ideas for future researchers.