Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

P10712 CHEESECAKE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Andreana Crance, Kevin Rodas, Rob Santora, Jeremy Smith, Matt Syska.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "P10712 CHEESECAKE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Andreana Crance, Kevin Rodas, Rob Santora, Jeremy Smith, Matt Syska."— Presentation transcript:

1 P10712 CHEESECAKE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Andreana Crance, Kevin Rodas, Rob Santora, Jeremy Smith, Matt Syska

2 Meeting Agenda Brief Project Summary 5 min. Project Statement 5 min. System Overview 10 min. Customer Needs & Engineering Specifications 5 min. Risks & Contingencies 5 min. What we have done so far 20 min. Concept Selection 15 min. Target Specs – How we will measure success 10 min. Improvement Ideas 10 min. MSDI Plan of Action 5 min.

3 P10712 Cheesecake Process Improvement The mission for the cheesecake process improvement is to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of cheesecake production in order to meet customer demand in both quantity and quality of the cheesecakes. Focusing on: Worker Safety Worker Productivity Efficiency of Process Proper utilization of equipment Scrap Reduction

4 Project Approach  Due to the scattered processes taking place for the cheesecakes, we thought it would be best to break the project into larger categories: Greasing Crumbing Pre-Tunnel Oven Mixing, Pouring, Loading Oven Post-Tunnel Oven Unloading oven, into freezer Slicing Packaging

5 System Overview

6 Value Stream Map

7 Customer Needs & Engineering Metrics

8

9

10

11 Risks and Contingencies

12

13

14 Process Evaluation Weight GreasingCrumbing Pre-Tunnel Oven Post Tunnel Oven SlicingPackaging Score Efficiency25%139199 Utilization25%139393 Safety25%939333 Equipment10%399333 Scrap15%391339

15 Pre process clean up Sprayer Calibration Human bending Greasing Efficiency1 Labor1 Ergonomic9 Equipment3 Scrap3 What we have observed in Greasing:

16 What we have observed in Crumbing:  No Direct Observation as of 10/2/2009  Known Issues:  Uneven distribution of crumbs Leads to scrap issues  Manual process  Nonconformity of crumb size  Crumb displacement at batter drop (pre-oven load) Crumbing Efficiency3 Labor3 Ergonomic3 Equipment9 Scrap9

17 Pre-Tunnel Pre Oven Efficiency9 Labor9 Ergonomic9 Equipment9 Scrap1 Cluttered area Human bending Labor intensive

18 Post-Tunnel Post Oven Efficiency1 Labor3 Ergonomic3 Equipment3 Scrap3 Cluttered area Manual process No standards

19 Slicing Issues  5S issues  Labor Utilization  Material Handling transitions  Scrap Issues  Machine maintenance reactive  TPM – Be proactive!  Staffing setup  Almost identical labels (marble vs. plain)  Lack of Quality Check-One instance of packing defective cheesecake  Walking  2s spin time for machine  Ergonomics – Bending and reaching  Putting covers on causes quality issues / lost productivity  No monitoring of cheesecake time on floor (out of freezer)  Variation in results due to lack of process control Slicing Efficiency9 Labor 9 Ergonomic3 Equipment3 Scrap3

20 Packaging No dedicated labor Reaching and bending Lack of organization Packaging Efficiency9 Labor3 Ergonomic3 Equipment3 Scrap9

21 Overall Issues  No standard procedure  No standard location for equipment on floor  Improper/inadequate tools used  Lack of set schedule for cheesecake process  Variable batch sizes  Lack of standard quality checks  Unnecessary movement (time & ergonomics concern)  Current machines may not be ideal  Lack of continuous flow

22 Concept Selection  Discussion

23 Target Specifications – Marginal and Target Values Metric No.MetricImportanceUnitsMarginal ValueTarget Value 1 average labor bottleneck utilization 9percentage per year>80%>85% 2risk of injuries9 (benchmarking unit using NIOSH, etc) 25% reduction of benchmarking unit 75% reduction of benchmarking unit 3people travel distance1 % travel distance reduction 10%25% 4 cycle time / cheesecake (minus bake time) 3min. 90% of current cycle time 75% of current cycle time 5 number of defective products 3Percentage scrap 75% of current defect rate 50% of current defect rate 6 number employees on cheesecake process 3employees One employee reassigned More than one employee reassigned 7throughput rate3throughput/hour110% of current value125% of current value 8 process improvement has full ROI for customer 9Years1 Year0.5 Years 9 Solutions meet Wegmans specific health code standards 9Y/NYY 10 Cheesecake retains “homemade” feel 9Y/NYY 11Process changes can meet holiday demand 9Y/NYY

24 List of Possible Ideas  Efficiency  Standardize batch size  Continuous flow of process  Waste reduction maintenance for equipment: Dropper, greaser, slicer  Standard locations for materials and equipment

25 List of Possible Ideas  Scrap  Quality Checks: “Defect Board”  Calibration of equipment: Dropper, greaser, etc.  Efficiency, Safety  Reduce total travel distance: people and materials  Efficiency, Safety, Equipment  Eliminating unnecessary motions, providing proper tools

26 List of Possible Ideas  Crumbing - (Labor Utilization, Scrap, Equipment)  Automated or assisted “Crumber”  Pre/Post Tunnel Oven - (Scrap, Utilization)  Regulate water for baking: volume controlled and assisted  Packaging - (Scrap, Efficiency, Utilization)  Alternative packaging methods

27 MSDI Plan – Our steps forward


Download ppt "P10712 CHEESECAKE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT Andreana Crance, Kevin Rodas, Rob Santora, Jeremy Smith, Matt Syska."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google