Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Excitation of Vibrational Eigenstates of Coupled Microcantilevers Using Ultrasound Radiation Force ASME 2nd International Conference on Micro and Nanosystems.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Excitation of Vibrational Eigenstates of Coupled Microcantilevers Using Ultrasound Radiation Force ASME 2nd International Conference on Micro and Nanosystems."— Presentation transcript:

1 Excitation of Vibrational Eigenstates of Coupled Microcantilevers Using Ultrasound Radiation Force ASME 2nd International Conference on Micro and Nanosystems Brooklyn, NY August 6, 2008 Thomas M. Huber, Brad Abell, Sam Barthell, Dan Mellema, Eric Ofstad Physics Department, Gustavus Adolphus College Arvind Raman, Matthew Spletzer Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University

2 Introduction Ultrasound Radiation Force Excitation
Excitation of microcantilevers using ultrasound radiation force Resonance frequency and mode shapes Higher order modes Selective excitation by phase shift Conclusions

3 Ultrasound Stimulated Radiation Force Excitation
Vibro-Acoustography Developed in 1998 at Mayo Clinic Ultrasound Research Lab by Fatemi & Greenleaf Difference frequency between two ultrasound sources causes excitation of object. Technique has been used for imaging in water and tissue, and mode excitation of objects in air Ultrasound Stimulated Radiation Force Excitation

4 Modal Excitation Using Ultrasound Radiation Force
Originally demonstrated in 2004 for Pipe Organ Reeds Have since used for ever smaller devices and higher frequencies Organ Reed Hard Drive MEMS Coupled AFM Suspension Gyroscope Microcantilevers Microcantilever 12 mm x 5 mm mm x 2 mm 3mm x 0.8mm mm x mm x 0.02 mm 100 Hz – 10 kHz Up to 30 kHz kHz Up to 80 kHz Up to 200 kHz Organ Reed 12 mm x 5 mm 100 Hz – 10 kHz The same ultrasound transducer has been used to excite from Hz up to 200 kHz!

5 Acoustic Radiation Force Excitation
Consider two sound waves impinging on an object P(r,t)=P1(r) sin(2πf1t + φ1) + P2(r) sin(2πf2t + φ2) The dynamic acoustic radiation force on an object is proportional to the square of the pressure FAcoustic = [ P(r,t)2 / ρc2 ] dr(r) dS P.J. Westervelt, JASA, 23, 312 (1951) G. Silva et al, Phys. Rev. E, 71, (2005) This radiation force will have component at the difference frequency Δf FDifference = F0 sin [2π Δf t + (φ2 - φ1) ] Δf =f2 - f1

6 Ultrasound Radiation Force Excitation
Suppressed carrier AM signal Centered at, for example, 450 kHz

7 Radiation Force Excitation: Advantages
Non-Contact Does not have driver resonances and does not excite fixture modes Wide Bandwidth Using our 500 kHz transducer, can excite structures with resonances from 100 Hz to over 200 kHz Focused The transducer used has focal spot of about 2 mm diameter Capability for selective excitation using multiple transducers

8 Generation of Excitation Signal
Can also generate a chirp waveform For example, fMod=4.5 kHz to 5.5 kHz in 0.6 seconds Leads to excitation frequency chirp from 9 kHz to 11 kHz

9 Radiation Force Excitation: Experimental Setup

10 Radiation Force Excitation: Experimental Setup

11 Microcantilever Pair using Ultrasound Radiation Force
Gold Microcantilevers (500 micron by 100 micron, 250 micron separation) Ultrasound 450 kHz central frequency Modulation chirp frequency of 4950 Hz to 5150 Hz Difference frequency of 9900 Hz to Hz Measure motion using laser Doppler vibrometer Comparison with scanning probe microsystem (Blue Triangles)

12 Microcantilever Pair using Ultrasound Radiation Force
Measure amplitude & phase at multiple points to determine operating deflection shapes

13 2nd Transverse Modes of Au pair (about 60 kHz)

14 First Torsional Mode of Au Pair (about 87 kHz)

15 Excitation of AFM Cantilever
Tipless Silicon AFM Microcantilever (300 micron by 20 micron) Ultrasound 450 kHz central frequency Modulation chirp frequency of 4500 Hz to 6750 Hz Difference frequency of 9000 Hz to Hz Smallest structure excited using ultrasound radiation force in air

16 Excitation using Ultrasound Radiation Force
Silicon AFM Cantilever (300 micron by 20 micron) Vibrometer response using Piezo base excitation (Cyan Triangles) Nearly identical frequency response obtained using Ultrasound Excitation

17 Excitation using Ultrasound Radiation Force
Silicon AFM Cantilever (300 micron by 20 micron) Repeat for 2nd bending mode (72 kHz) Ultrasound data taken at single frequencies using lock-in amplifier

18 Excitation using Ultrasound Radiation Force
Repeat for 3rd bending mode (204 kHz) Highest frequency excited using ultrasound radiation force in air Note: Additional peaks in base excitation spectra due to fixture/piezo resonances

19 Selective Excitation using Phase-Shifted Pair of Transducers
Instead of using a single transducer, use a pair of ultrasound transducers to allow selective excitation If radiation force from both transducers are in phase, selectively excites symmetric mode while suppressing antisymmetric mode If radiation force is out of phase, selectively excites antisymmetric mode while suppressing symmetric mode Previously demonstrated for selectively exciting transverse and torsional modes of cantilevers, and hard drive suspensions

20 Phase-shifted selective excitation: Detailed Description
Two 40 kHz transducers, each with dual sideband suppressed carrier AM waveform Modulation frequency swept from Hz Difference frequency Δf leads to excitation from 9900 Hz – kHz Modulation phase difference of 90 degrees leads to 180 degree phase difference in radiation force

21 Photos of apparatus used for phase-shift excitation

22 Phase Shifted Selective Excitation
Adjust amplitudes of two 40 kHz transducers to give roughly equal response

23 Phase Shifted Selective Excitation
Adjust amplitudes of two 40 kHz transducers to give roughly equal response When they are driven together in phase, strong enhancement of the symmetric peak, while some cancellation of the antisymmetric peak

24 Phase Shifted Selective Excitation
Adjust amplitudes of two 40 kHz transducers to give roughly equal response When they are driven out of phase, strong suppression of the the symmetric peak, while some enhancement of the antisymmetric peak

25 Phase Shifted Selective Excitation
Driving in-phase excites symmetric but suppresses antisymmetric mode Driving out-of-phase excites antisymmetric while suppressing symmetric mode Can differentiate two overlapping modes. This capability may be very valuable for coupled cantilevers. High mass sensitivity requires weak coupling, but this implies that the symmetric and antisymmetric would nearly overlap By using ultrasound excitation, the symmetric mode can be highly suppressed

26 Conclusions Ultrasound excitation allows non-contact excitation of microcantilever Excitation demonstrated up to 200 kHz Selective excitation of symmetric versus antisymmetric modes Using phase-shifted pair of transducers Allows overlapping modes to be individually excited May increase sensitivity of mass sensing Future possibilities: Other MEMS devices New transducers should allow about 300 kHz or more of bandwidth Excitation of microcantilevers in water In-plane excitation

27 Mostafa Fatemi and James Greenleaf
Acknowledgements Brad Abell, Dan Mellema, Physics Department, Gustavus Adolphus College Mostafa Fatemi and James Greenleaf Ultrasound Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Foundation This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Thank You

28 Mass Sensing using Microcantilevers
General Goal: Detect small masses using change in vibrational state of a microcantilever For example, a microcantilever can be coated with a chemical that will bond with the target material Adding mass ∆m to cantilever (m0) will lower resonance frequency f0

29 Coupled Microcantilevers
Instead of a single microcantilever, pair of coupled microcantilevers Coupling is through the overhang As with all coupled oscillators, has symmetric and antisymmetric eigenstates Sensitivity requires measuring amplitudes of both peaks Use Ultrasound Radiation Force Excitation for this Device

30 Ultrasound Excitation of Nickel Cantilever Pair
Symmetric: kHz Antisymmetric: kHz Symmetric: kHz Antisymmetric: kHz

31 Coupled Microcantilevers
Using coupled cantilevers may increase ability for mass detection Recall, shift of frequencies due to mass is Change in amplitude of eigenstates is Weak coupling (κ<<1) implies very large change in amplitude of eigenstate Problem is that symmetric and antisymmetric states nearly overlap Selective excitation using ultrasound excitation may be advantageous


Download ppt "Excitation of Vibrational Eigenstates of Coupled Microcantilevers Using Ultrasound Radiation Force ASME 2nd International Conference on Micro and Nanosystems."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google