1. Integrating assessment with instruction to keep learning on track Plenary address to NSTA Convention on Science assessment: research and practical approaches for classroom teachers, school administrators and school districts Chicago, IL; November 9, 2005 Dylan Wiliam, Educational Testing Service

2. Overview of presentation Why raising achievement is important Why investing in teachers is the answer Why assessment for learning should be the focus Why teacher learning communities should be the mechanism

3. Raising achievement matters For individuals –Increased lifetime salary –Improved health For society –Lower criminal justice costs –Lower health-care costs –Increased economic growth

4. Where’s the solution? Structure –Small high schools –K-8 schools Alignment –Curriculum reform –Textbook replacement Governance –Charter schools –Vouchers Technology

5. It’s the classroom Variability at the classroom level is up to 4 times greater than at school level It’s not class size It’s not the between-class grouping strategy It’s not the within-class grouping strategy It’s the teacher

6. Teacher quality A labor force issue with 2 solutions –Replace existing teachers with better ones? No evidence that more pay brings in better teachers No evidence that there are better teachers out there deterred by certification requirements –Improve the effectiveness of existing teachers The “love the one you’re with” strategy It can be done We know how to do it, but at scale? Quickly? Sustainably?

7. Functions of assessment For evaluating institutions For describing individuals For supporting learning –Monitoring learning Whether learning is taking place –Diagnosing (informing) learning What is not being learnt –Forming learning What to do about it

8. Effects of formative assessment Several major reviews of the research –Natriello (1987) –Crooks (1988) –Black & Wiliam (1998) –Nyquist (2003) All find consistent, substantial effects

9. Kinds of feedback (Nyquist, 2003) Weaker feedback only –Knowledge of results (KoR) Feedback only –KoR + clear goals or knowledge of correct results (KCR) Weak formative assessment –KCR+ explanation (KCR+e) Moderate formative assessment –(KCR+e) + specific actions for gap reduction Strong formative assessment –(KCR+e) + activity

10. Effect of formative assessment (HE) NEffect Weaker feedback only310.16 Feedback only480.23 Weaker formative assessment490.30 Moderate formative assessment410.33 Strong formative assessment160.51

11. Formative assessment Classroom assessment is not (necessarily) formative assessment Formative assessment is not (necessarily) classroom assessment

12. Formative assessment Assessment for learning is any assessment for which the first priority in its design and practice is to serve the purpose of promoting pupils’ learning. It thus differs from assessment designed primarily to serve the purposes of accountability, or of ranking, or of certifying competence. An assessment activity can help learning if it provides information to be used as feedback, by teachers, and by their pupils, in assessing themselves and each other, to modify the teaching and learning activities in which they are engaged. Such assessment becomes ‘formative assessment’ when the evidence is actually used to adapt the teaching work to meet learning needs. Black et al., 2002

13. Feedback and formative assessment “Feedback is information about the gap between the actual level and the reference level of a system parameter which is used to alter the gap in some way” (Ramaprasad, 1983 p. 4) Three key instructional processes –Establishing where learners are in their learning –Establishing where they are going –Establishing how to get there

14. Aspects of formative assessment Where the learner is going Where the learner is How to get there Teacher Clarify learning intentions Engineering effective discussions Providing feedback that moves learners on Peer Understand/ clarify criteria for success Activating students as instructional resources for one another Learner Understand criteria for success Activating students as owners of their own learning

15. Five key strategies… Clarifying and understanding learning intentions and criteria for success Engineering effective classroom discussions that elicit evidence of learning Providing feedback that moves learners forward Activating students as instructional resources for each other Activating students as the owners of their own learning

16. …and one big idea Use evidence about learning to adapt instruction to meet student needs

17. Keeping Learning on Track (KLT) A pilot guides a plane or boat toward its destination by taking constant readings and making careful adjustments in response to wind, currents, weather, etc. A KLT teacher does the same: –Plans a carefully chosen route ahead of time (in essence building the track) –Takes readings along the way –Changes course as conditions dictate

18. Regulation of learning Teaching as engineering learning environments Key features: –Create student engagement –Well-regulated Long feedback cycles vs. variable feedback cycles Quality control vs. quality assurance in learning Teaching vs. learning Regulation of activity vs. regulation of learning

19. Regulation of learning Proactive (upstream) regulation –Planning regulation into the learning environment –Planning for evoking information Interactive (downstream) regulation –‘Negotiating the swiftly-flowing river’ –‘Moments of contingency’ –Tightness of regulation (goals vs. horizons) Retrospective regulation –Structured reflection (e.g., lesson study)

20. Types of formative assessment Long-cycle –Focus: between units –Length: four weeks to one year Medium-cycle –Focus: within units –Length: one day to two weeks Short-cycle –Focus: within lessons –Length: five seconds to one hour

21. Practical techniques: Questioning Improving teacher questioning –Generating questions with colleagues –Closed v open –Low-order v high-order –Appropriate wait-time Getting away from I-R-E –Basketball rather than serial table-tennis –‘No hands up’ (except to ask a question) –Class polls to review current attitudes towards an issue –‘Hot Seat’ questioning All-student response systems –ABCD cards –Mini white-boards –Exit passes

22. Practical techniques: feedback Comment-only grading Focused grading Explicit reference to rubrics Suggestions on how to improve –‘Strategy cards’ ideas for improvement –Not giving complete solutions Re-timing assessment –(eg two-thirds-of-the-way-through-a-unit test)

23. Practical techniques: sharing learning expectations Explaining learning objectives at start of lesson/unit Criteria in students’ language Posters of key words to talk about learning –eg describe, explain, evaluate Planning/writing frames Annotated examples of different standards to ‘flesh out’ assessment rubrics (e.g. lab reports) Opportunities for students to design their own tests

24. Practical techniques: peer and self-assessment Students assessing their own/peers’ work –with scoring guides, rubrics or exemplars –two stars and a wish Training students to pose questions Identifying group weaknesses Self-assessment of understanding –Red/green discs –Traffic lights –Smiley faces –Post-it notes End-of-lesson students’ review

25. Professional development must be Consistent with what we know about adult learning, incorporating –choice –respect for prior experience –recognition of varied learning styles and motivation Sustained Contextualized Consistent with research on expertise

26. A model for teacher learning Ideas Evidence Small steps Flexibility Choice Accountability Support

27. Why Teacher Learning Communities? Teacher as local expert Sustained over time Supportive forum for learning Embedded in day-to-day reality Domain-specific

28. A four-part model Initial workshops TLC meetings Peer observations Training for leaders

29. Three questions What formative assessment strategies do you use already? What new ideas do you want to add to your practice? What will you do less of to make time? –During lessons –Outside of lessons

30. What can you do? Write a memo to yourself –To be opened in the New Year –Commit to making 2 or 3 changes –Hold yourself accountable Set up a study group Set up peer observations