1. Map to Success Irina McLaughlin Donna Frazee CED/STLL

2. Current Resources Faculty  Information Literacy Modules  Writing Center  Faculty Center for Teaching & Learning  Ask a Librarian  Turnitin.com  Writing Across the Curriculum  Office of Integrity & Ethical Development

3. Current Resources Students  Information Literacy Modules  Writing Center  Faculty Center for Teaching & Learning  Ask a Librarian  Turnitin.com

4. Issues Faculty  Writing guidelines across colleges and departments vary  Unaware of available resources for referring students (writing conventions, and others)  Scattered resources lack connective thread  Time and motivation (pay-off)  Training of adjuncts for continuity (academic integrity, incorrect use of writing conventions, and others)

5. Issues Students  Requirements/expectation for guidelines vary by instructor (no uniformity of what is correct versus acceptable)  Writing Center attendance (apprehension, uncomfortable/fear, time, resources, others)  Literacy Modules – motivation (students can pass w/o transfer of skills)  Ask a Librarian – scheduling

6. Goal  Change academic culture, where both faculty/adjuncts and students embrace the significance of academic integrity and writing conventions. Objective  Students apply the writing conventions appropriately in their academic work; faculty applies clear and consistent guidelines for assessment.

7. Vision  Multi-step, on-going process involving cooperative action from all partners (such as FCTL, WC, WAC, IED, Library Services)

8. Next Steps  Expand FCTL training for faculty/adjuncts by creating/or accessing Literacy Modules addressing writing conventions (i.e., correct quoting, citing, paraphrasing)  Define clear, concise and consistent guidelines for faculty/adjuncts across departments and colleges  Recommend embedding “Ask A Librarian” URL as a standard within syllabi and all online courses

9. Potential Barriers  Peer resistance to change  Student resistance to structure  Perception of what services should be available versus current provisions  Limited resources (personnel, time, financial)  Differences in perception of academic integrity significance