Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Cost Minimization Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Cost Minimization Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Cost Minimization Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009

2 2 Cost Minimization A firm is a cost-minimizer if it produces a given output level y  0 at smallest possible total cost. When the firm faces given input prices w = (w 1,w 2,…,w n ) the total cost function will be written as c(w 1,…,w n,y).

3 3 The Cost-Minimization Problem Consider a firm using two inputs to make one output. The production function is y = f(x 1,x 2 ). Take the output level y  0 as given. Given the input prices w 1 and w 2, the cost of an input bundle (x 1,x 2 ) is w 1 x 1 + w 2 x 2.

4 4 The Cost-Minimization Problem For given w 1, w 2 and y, the firm’s cost- minimization problem is to solve subject to

5 5 The Cost-Minimization Problem The levels x 1 *(w 1,w 2,y) and x 1 *(w 1,w 2,y) in the least-costly input bundle are the firm’s conditional factor demands for inputs 1 and 2. The (smallest possible) total cost for producing y output units is therefore

6 6 Conditional Factor Demands Given w 1, w 2 and y, how is the least costly input bundle located? And how is the total cost function computed?

7 7 Iso-cost Lines A curve that contains all of the input bundles that cost the same amount is an iso-cost curve. E.g., given w 1 and w 2, the $100 iso-cost line has the equation

8 8 Iso-cost Lines Generally, given w 1 and w 2, the equation of the $c iso-cost line is Rearranging… Slope is - w 1 /w 2.

9 9 Iso-cost Lines c’  w 1 x 1 +w 2 x 2 c”  w 1 x 1 +w 2 x 2 c’ < c” x1x1 x2x2 Slopes = -w 1 /w 2.

10 10 The y’-Output Unit Isoquant x1x1 x2x2 All input bundles yielding y’ units of output. Which is the cheapest? f(x 1,x 2 )  y’

11 11 The Cost-Minimization Problem x1x1 x2x2 All input bundles yielding y’ units of output. Which is the cheapest? f(x 1,x 2 )  y’ x1*x1* x2*x2*

12 12 The Cost-Minimization Problem x1x1 x2x2 f(x 1,x 2 )  y’ x1*x1* x2*x2* At an interior cost-min input bundle: (a) and (b) slope of isocost = slope of isoquant

13 13 The Cost-Minimization Problem x1x1 x2x2 f(x 1,x 2 )  y’ x1*x1* x2*x2* At an interior cost-min input bundle: (a) and (b) slope of isocost = slope of isoquant; i.e.

14 14 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. A firm’s Cobb-Douglas production function is Input prices are w 1 and w 2. What are the firm’s conditional factor demand functions?

15 15 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. At the input bundle (x 1 *,x 2 *) which minimizes the cost of producing y output units: (a) (b) and

16 16 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. (a)(b)

17 17 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. (a)(b) From (b),

18 18 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. (a)(b) From (b), Now substitute into (a) to get

19 19 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. (a)(b) From (b), Now substitute into (a) to get Sois the firm’s conditional demand for input 1.

20 20 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. is the firm’s conditional demand for input 2. Sinceand

21 21 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. So the cheapest input bundle yielding y output units is

22 22 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. So the firm’s total cost function is

23 23 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. So the firm’s total cost function is

24 24 A Cobb-Douglas Ex. of Cost Min. So the firm’s total cost function is

25 25 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. The firm’s production function is Input prices w 1 and w 2 are given. What are the firm’s conditional demands for inputs 1 and 2? What is the firm’s total cost function?

26 26 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. x1x1 x2x2 min{4x 1,x 2 }  y’ 4x 1 = x 2

27 27 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. x1x1 x2x2 4x 1 = x 2 min{4x 1,x 2 }  y’ Where is the least costly input bundle yielding y’ output units?

28 28 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. x1x1 x2x2 x 1 * = y/4 x 2 * = y 4x 1 = x 2 min{4x 1,x 2 }  y’ Where is the least costly input bundle yielding y’ output units?

29 29 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. The firm’s production function is and the conditional input demands are and

30 30 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. The firm’s production function is and the conditional input demands are and So the firm’s total cost function is

31 31 A Perfect Complements Ex.: Cost Min. The firm’s production function is and the conditional input demands are and So the firm’s total cost function is

32 32 Average Total Costs For positive output levels y, a firm’s average total cost of producing y units is

33 33 RTS and Average Total Costs The returns-to-scale properties of a firm’s technology determine how average production costs change with output level. Our firm is presently producing y’ output units. How does the firm’s average production cost change if it instead produces 2y’ units of output?

34 34 Constant RTS and Average Total Costs If a firm’s technology exhibits constant returns-to-scale then doubling its output level from y’ to 2y’ requires doubling all input levels.

35 35 Constant RTS and Average Total Costs If a firm’s technology exhibits constant returns-to-scale then doubling its output level from y’ to 2y’ requires doubling all input levels. Total production cost doubles. Average production cost does not change.

36 36 Decreasing RTS and Avg. Total Costs If a firm’s technology exhibits decreasing returns-to-scale then doubling its output level from y’ to 2y’ requires more than doubling all input levels.

37 37 Decreasing RTS and Avg. Total Costs If a firm’s technology exhibits decreasing returns-to-scale then doubling its output level from y’ to 2y’ requires more than doubling all input levels. Total production cost more than doubles. Average production cost increases.

38 38 Increasing RTS and Avg. Total Costs If a firm’s technology exhibits increasing returns-to-scale then doubling its output level from y’ to 2y’ requires less than doubling all input levels.

39 39 Increasing RTS and Avg. Total Costs If a firm’s technology exhibits increasing returns-to-scale then doubling its output level from y’ to 2y’ requires less than doubling all input levels. Total production cost less than doubles. Average production cost decreases.

40 40 Short-Run & Long-Run Total Costs In the long-run a firm can vary all of its input levels. Consider a firm that cannot change its input 2 level from x 2 ’ units. How does the short-run total cost of producing y output units compare to the long-run total cost of producing y units of output?

41 41 Short-Run & Long-Run Total Costs The long-run cost-minimization problem is The short-run cost-minimization problem is subject to

42 42 Short-Run & Long-Run Total Costs The short-run cost-min. problem is the long-run problem subject to the extra constraint that x 2 = x 2 ’. If the long-run choice for x 2 was x 2 ’ then the extra constraint x 2 = x 2 ’ is not really a constraint at all and so the long-run and short-run total costs of producing y output units are the same.

43 43 Short-Run & Long-Run Total Costs But, if the long-run choice for x 2  x 2 ’ then the extra constraint x 2 = x 2 ’ prevents the firm in this short-run from achieving its long-run production cost, causing the short-run total cost to exceed the long-run total cost of producing y output units.

44 44 Short-Run & Long-Run Total Costs Short-run total cost exceeds long-run total cost except for the output level where the short-run input level restriction is the long- run input level choice. This says that the long-run total cost curve always has one point in common with any particular short-run total cost curve.

45 45 Short-Run & Long-Run Total Costs y $ c(y) c s (y) A short-run total cost curve always has one point in common with the long-run total cost curve, and is elsewhere higher than the long-run total cost curve.


Download ppt "1 Cost Minimization Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google