Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 9: Climate Sensitivity and Feedback Mechanisms This chapter discusses: 1.Climate feedback processes 2.Climate sensitivity and climate feedback.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 9: Climate Sensitivity and Feedback Mechanisms This chapter discusses: 1.Climate feedback processes 2.Climate sensitivity and climate feedback."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 9: Climate Sensitivity and Feedback Mechanisms This chapter discusses: 1.Climate feedback processes 2.Climate sensitivity and climate feedback parameter 3.Examples (Materials are drawn heavily from D. Hartmann’s textbook and online materials by J.-Y. Yu of UCI. Guo-Yue Niu contributed significantly to the preparation of this lecture.)

2 Climate Feedback and Sensitivity Feedback is a circular causal process whereby some proportion of a system's output is returned (fed back) to the input.processinput ΔT final = ΔT + ΔT sensitivity Climate System ΔTΔT ΔQΔQ ΔT final ΔQ feedback can be either negative or positive input output ΔQ final = ΔQ + ΔQ feedback ΔQ final

3

4 An objective measure of climate feedback and sensitivity The strength of a feedback depends on how sensitive the change in input (Q) responds to the change in output (T) : Feedback strength: λ = ΔQ / ΔT Climate sensitivity: λ -1 = ΔT / ΔQ 1. Positive values  negative feedbacks, stable Negative values  positive feedbacks, unstable λ BB = 4σT 3 = 3.75Wm -2 K -1 2. The larger λ, the stronger feedback.

5

6 Stefan-Boltzmann feedback Outgoing longwave radiation: F = σT 4 σ = 5.67x10 -8 The strength of the feedback: 1. A negative feedback, stable 2. 1K increase in T would increase F by 3.75 Wm -2 (see Fig. 9.1) λ BB = ∂F / ∂T = 4σ T 3 = 3.75 Wm -2 K -1

7

8 Water vapor feedback Clausius-Clapeyron relationship: e s = f(T) 1% increase in T would increase 20% in e s Water vapor is the principal greenhouse gases. The feedback strength: λ v = – 1.7 Wm -2 K -1 1. A positive feedback, unstable 2. Weaker than λ BB 3. λ BB + λ v = 2.05 Wm -2 K -1 (see Fig. 9.1)

9

10 Ice (snow) albedo feedback Striking contrast between ice-covered and ice-free surfaces In ice-covered regions, more solar energy reflected back to space: Feedback strength: λ ice = –0.6 Wm -2 K -1 1. Positive feedback, unstable 2. λ BB + λ v + λ ice =1.45 Wm -2 K -1

11 An example of climate feedback Global Temperature Anomalies Northern Hemisphere Snow Cover Anomalies ΔTΔT ΔQΔQ

12

13 Snow (ice)-albedo climate feedback Chapin et al. (2005), Science 1. Decrease in snow-cover and snow season 2. Tundra  trees Snow cover change  Temperature change

14 Total feedback λ total =1.45 Wm -2 K -1 3.75 Wm -2 K -1 Positive feedbacknegative feedback λ total Doubling of atmospheric CO 2  2.9 K Without ice-albedo feedback  2.0 K

15 −31 −48 −17 +15%

16 Cloud feedback 1.It is unclear what is the strength and even directions (negative or positive). From GCM simulations, λ cloud = 0 ─ −0.8. 2. Could effects can be either “umbrella” or “blanket”. umbrella blanket Low cumulus clouds Negative feedback High cirrus clouds Positive feedback

17 Cloud feedback (con.) 3. It is uncertain whether an increased temperature will lead to increased or decreased cloud cover. 4. It is generally agreed that increased temperatures will cause higher rates of evaporation and hence make more water vapor available for cloud formation, the form (e.g., type, height, and size of droplets) which these additional clouds will take is much less certain.

18 Energy-balance climate models 1.Zero-dimensional EBMs (1-α) S 0 /4 = σT e 4 shortwave in = Longwave out The surface T: T s = T e + ΔT (greenhouse effects) The Erath: S 0 = 1376 Wm -2, α = 0.3, T e = 255 K, T s =288 K Venus: S 0 = 2619 Wm -2, α = 0.7, T e = 242 K, greenhouse gases T s = 730 K

19 Energy balance climate models (con.) 2. One-dimensional EBMs (Sellers and Budyko in 1969) Shortwave in = Transport out + Longwave out S(x) [1 - α(x) ] = C [ T(x) - Tm ] + [ A + B T(x) ] S(x) = the mean annual radiation incident at latitude (x) = S 0 /4 *s(x) α(x) = the albedo at latitude (x) for ice-free (Ts > −10°C) : 0.3 for ice (Ts < −10°C) : 0.62 C = the transport coefficient (3.81 W m -2 °C -1 ) T(x) = the surface temperature at latitude (x) Tm = the mean global surface temperature A and B are constants A = 204.0 W m -2 and B = 2.17 W m -2 K -1 This B is equivalent to λ BB (3.75) or λ BB + λ v = 2.05 (see Fig. 9.1)

20 Energy balance climate models (con.) Changeable parameters: S 0 α(x) (0.62) C (3.81 W m -2 °C -1 ) A and B are (B = 2.17 W m -2 K -1 ) The model contains four kinds of climate feedbacks: 1) Ice-albedo feedback (Ts> − 5°C ; 0.8) (see Fig. 9.5) 2) Stefan-Boltzmann feedback: B (λ BB ) = 3.75 3) water-vapor feedback: B (λ BB + λ v ) = 2.05 ; 1.45 (Budyco, 1969); 1.6 (Cess, 1974) 4) dynamical feedbacks and zonal energy transport: C=0 means no such a feedback You may also add cloud feedbacks by changing: B smaller (positive feedbacks) B larger (negative feedbacks) Try Toy Model 4 at the course website

21 Biogeochemical feedbacks – A Daisyworld model

22

23 Growth Factor white = 1 - 0.003265*(295.5K -T white ) 2 Global mean temperature: σT e 4 = S 0 (1 – α p ) /4 α p =A g α g + A w α w + A b α b Local temperature: σT i 4 = S 0 (1 – α i ) /4 T i 4 = η(α p – α i ) + T e 4 where 0<η < S 0 /(4σ) represents the allowable range between the two extremes in which horizontal transport of energy is perfectly efficient (0) and least efficient [S 0 /(4σ)].

24 A Daisyworld model Global mean emission temperature is remarkably stable for a wide range of solar constant values. (see Fig. 9.9d); Run Toy Model 1 at the course website.

25

26

27

28

29 Climate Trend 1976 to 2000 Increase in T  melting of snow and frozen soil  larger area of wetlands  more soil carbon released as CH 4  increase in T Together with ice-albedo feedback, the warming trend will be accelerated

30 Other feedbacks at regional scales Albedo Increase in albedo SW radiation absorbed decreases R n decreases H, LE decreases Reduction in: Cloudness Precipitation convergence Increase in insolation Increase in Rn Increase in albedo Reduction in: Soil moisture

31 Other feedbacks at regional scales Soil Moisture Decrease in soil moisture LE decreases H Increases Ts Increases Rn decreases Reduction in: Cloudness Precipitation convergence Increase in insolation Increase in Rn Decrease in soil moisture

32 Equilibration times of the climate systems Radiative forcing Climate System Atmosphere 10 days Atmosphere boundary layer 1day Ocean Land Mixed layer mths-yrs Sea ice days to 100 y Ice/snow 10 days Lakes 10 days Deep ocean 1000 years glacier 100s yrs Biosphere 10 d to 100 yrs

33 Three-dimensional atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) 1. Computer programs Describing atmosphere at >150,000 grid cells 2. Operate in two alternate stages: Dynamics: for whole global array, simultaneously solves: Conservation of Energy Conservation of Momentum Conservation of Mass Ideal Gas Law Physics: for each independent column, computes mass/energy divergences, surface inputs, buoyant exchange, e.g., Radiation Transfer Boundary Layer Surface Processes Convection (cloud) Precipitation 3. Coupling with Ocean, Land, Biosphere, Sea Ice, and Ice Sheets Grid spacing: ~ 3°×3° horizontally ~ meters/km vertically Time step ~ 30 minutes

34 Concluding Remarks The inclusion or exclusion of a feedback mechanism could dramatically alter the climate modeling results. Some important feedbacks may have not been included in GCMs. Global climate models are getting more complex as more feedback mechanisms are included. Analyses on climate feedbacks and sensitivity can help 1)understand the mechanisms of climate change. 2)select important processes and limit the complexity of climate models.


Download ppt "Chapter 9: Climate Sensitivity and Feedback Mechanisms This chapter discusses: 1.Climate feedback processes 2.Climate sensitivity and climate feedback."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google