Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.

Published byGarey Craig Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS Environment Authors: Date: 2010-07-12

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission July 2010 Slide 2 Background In May IEEE meeting, we have made a presentation on the interference management using beamforming technique for OBSS environment [1]. This technique enables two APs to transmit data frames simultaneously by null steering to STAs associate with the other AP. Brief evaluation for throughput performance shows that the proposed technique enhances throughput. Yusuke Asai (NTT)

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission July 2010 Slide 3 Abstract This submission introduces the detail of the frame sequence for the proposed interference management technique in OBSSs environment. Throughput evaluation shows that the proposed interference management technique is effective for both implicit and explicit feedback cases. Yusuke Asai (NTT)

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 4 Basic concept of interference management using beamforming in OBSS environment In dense OBSSs environment (ex. typical apartment scenario in Japan [2]), neither power control scheme frequency channel selection is effective for improve throughput performance [1]. Some degrees of freedom on antennas at an AP can be used to mitigate interference to the STAs associated with other BSSs to form null to them. When two APs mutually form null beams to the STAs associating to the partner’s AP, spatial multiplexing between two APs is possible. Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 STA1 STA2 AP1 AP2 Null steering to the STAs on the other BSS

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission Summary of the proposed interference management technique [1] Merits of the proposed interference management technique: Simple implementation: Each AP inherently has a transmit beamforming function because DL MU-MIMO transmission will mandatory feature in TGac. Throughput performance improvement: The proposed interference management technique improves throughput performance up to 53% when two APs are collaborate with each other. July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 5

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 6 Update Points More details on frame sequence is introduced. –Two sets of frame sequence for implicit and explicit feedback –The details of NAV setting (MAC level protection against hidden nodes) Throughput performance for both implicit and explicit feedback cases is evaluated. Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 7 Implicit / explicit beamforming [2] Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 Pros.Cons. Implicit beamforming It has small overhead to obtain CSI. After calibration, only sounding frame transmission is required, which leads to higher throughput performance. (small overhead) Calibration function must be supported on PHY layer. Additional signal processing and memory are required. (increased implementation complexity) Explicit beamforming There is no need to equip calibration function on AP/STA Signal processing in PHY layer is much simpler than implicit case. (simple implementation) In addition to sounding frame transmission, it requires CSI feedback from each STA. (large overhead)

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 8 Legend: R: RTS frame C: CTS frame S: Sounding frame Data: A-MPDU Data frame (beamformed) BA: BlockAck frame Frame sequence: 1.Sequence initiation 2.CSI acquisition 3.NAV setting 4.data transmission (spatially multiplexing using beamforming) 5.BA transmission (scheduled) 6.Medium is released. Frame sequence using implicit feedback (1/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA CData for STA2 R S R S Data for STA1 Omni-directional transmissionBeamformed transmission

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 9 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (2/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA CData for STA2 R S R S Data for STA1 AP1 transmits an RTS frame: - to invite AP2 to cooperate spatially multiplexed transmission by AP1 and AP2. - to inform AP2 the available number of spatial streams used by AP2. - to request STA1 to transmit sounding frame after AP2’s response. This RTS frame sets the NAV until the end of final sounding frame sent by STA2.

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 10 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (3/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA CData for STA2 R S R S Data for STA1 When AP2 accepts AP1’s invitation, it responds by a CTS frame. (Otherwise, AP2’s CTS frame contains the information to refuse cooperation.) The CTS frame includes the number of spatial streams used by AP2. The CTS frame also requests STA2 to transmit a sounding frame after the sounding frame from STA1. This CTS frames set the NAV until the end of final sounding frame from STA2. NAV

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 11 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (4/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA CData for STA2 R S R S Data for STA1 STA1 and STA2 transmit sounding frames (NDP) for AP1 and AP2 to estimate CSI between STA1/STA2 and AP1/AP2. (It is assumed that calibration among APs/STAs is established prior to this sequence.) NAV

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 12 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (5/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA CData for STA2 R S R S Data for STA1 AP1 transmits RTS frame to protect the data and the BlockACK frames by setting NAV. In addition, the RTS frame informs the length of the data frame to AP2. (This frame also provides enough time for AP1/AP2 to calculate beamforming weight.) NAV

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 13 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (6/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 R S S Data for STA1 AP2 transmits a CTS frame to inform it is ready for the multiplexed transmission using beamforming. In addition, this frame sets appropriate length of NAV for the next data frame and BlockAck frame. AP2 set the duration of its data frame less than the data frame of AP1. AP1 and AP2 may request STAs to transmit CTS frame when there are STAs which are affected by hidden nodes[3]. NAV R C

14 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 14 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (7/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 R S S Data for STA1 AP1 and AP2 transmit the beamformed data frames simultaneously. STA1 and STA2 can receive its frame without interference because of null-steering by AP1 and AP2. NAV R C (Null beam)

15 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission NAV Slide 15 Frame sequence using implicit feedback (8/8) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.3.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 R S S Data for STA1 STA1 and STA2 transmit BlockAck frame in scheduled manner. After BlockAck transmission, medium is released. NAV R C

16 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 16 Legend: R: RTS frame C: CTS frame S: Sounding frame F: CSI feedback frame Data: A-MPDU data frame (beamformed) BA: BlockAck frame Frame sequence: 1.Sequence initiation 2.CSI acquisition for AP1 3.CSI acquisition for AP2 4.NAV setting 5.data transmission (spatially multiplexing using beamforming) 6.BA transmission (scheduled) 7.Medium is released. Frame sequence using explicit feedback (1/6) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 RS F Data for STA1R C F 3. S F F 7.

17 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 17 Frame sequence using explicit feedback (2/6) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 R S F Data for STA1R C F 3. S F F 7. AP1 transmits an RTS frame to invite AP2 for multiplexed transmission by AP1 and AP2. The number of available spatial streams used by AP2 is sent to AP2 by the RTS frame. This RTS frame sets the NAV until the end of final sounding frame sent by STA2. NAV Omni-directional transmissionBeamformed transmission

18 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 18 Frame sequence using explicit feedback (3/6) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 RS F Data for STA1R C F 3. S F F 7. When AP2 accepts AP1’s invitation, it responds a CTS frame to inform the acceptance. (Otherwise, AP2 responds to refuse cooperation.) The CTS frame also informs the number of spatial streams used by AP2 to AP1. This CTS frame set the NAV until the end of final CSI feedback frame from STA2. NAV

19 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 19 Frame sequence using explicit feedback (4/6) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 R S F Data for STA1R C F 3. S F F 7. AP1 transmits a sounding frame to STA1 and STA2 for explicit CSI feedback. STA1 and STA2 estimate CSI and feedback the estimated CSI to AP1 in scheduled manner. (In the proposed interference management technique, STAs need transmit CSI feedback frame to both of two APs, which increase overhead. Some kinds of CSI compression scheme are useful for the proposed technique[4].) NAV

20 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 20 Frame sequence using explicit feedback (5/6) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 RS F Data for STA1R C F 3. S F F 7. AP2 carries out explicit CSI feedback as well as AP1. NAV

21 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 21 Frame sequence using explicit feedback (6/6) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 AP1 (initiator) STA1 AP2 (responder) STA2 2.1.4.5.6. C BA Data for STA2 RS F Data for STA1R C F 3. S F F 7. NAV After APs obtain complete CSI, the remaining sequence is identical to implicit feedback case. NAV

22 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 22 Throughput Evaluation ParameterValue # of APs2 # of Tx/Rx antennas per AP8 # of Tx/Rx antennas per STA2 # of STAs per AP1 / 2 / 3 / 4 # of subcarrier per spatial stream234 Frequency bandwidth80 MHz MCS64QAM, R=5/6 MSDU size1500 Byte A-MPDU size64kByte Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 Evaluation Parameters

23 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 23 Frame sequence without interference management (implicit /explicit feedback) One user per AP case, an AP transmits SU-MIMO frames. In this case, neither sounding frame nor CSI feedback is transmitted. AP1 STA1 AP2 STA2 Data for STA1 Data transmission from AP1 to STA1 (Channel access phase based on DCF) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 (medium busy) BA Data for STA2 Data transmission from AP2 to STA2 (SU-MIMO)

24 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 24 Frame sequence without interference management (implicit feedback) AP1 STA1 AP2 STA3 Data transmission from AP1 to STA1/2 Data transmission from AP2 to STA3/4 (Channel access phase based on DCF) Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 (medium busy) STA4 (medium busy) Data for STA4 S S R BA S S R (medium busy) STA2 (DL MU-MIMO) Data for STA3 Data for STA2 Data for STA1

25 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 25 Frame sequence without interference management (explicit feedback) AP1 STA1 AP2 STA3 Data transmission from AP1 to STA1 and 2Data transmission from AP2 to STA3 and 4 Channel access phase based on DCF Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 (medium busy) STA2 STA4 F (medium busy) BA S F F S F Data for STA4 Data for STA3 Data for STA2 Data for STA1

26 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission The number of STAs per AP Normalized throughput Slide 26 Throughput Evaluation Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 Implicit Feedback case 52% of throughput improvement is achieved when the number of STAs per AP is two. In this case, throughput performance of the proposed technique is saturated because both AP uses all of degrees of freedom at antenna for DL MU-MIMO beamforming and nulling not to radiate interference to the STAs on the other AP. When the number of STA per AP is four, there is no degrees of freedom at antenna. 52%

27 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission The number of STAs per AP Normalized throughput Slide 27 Throughput Evaluation Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010 Explicit Feedback case 37% Although overhead due to CSI feedback increases in explicit feedback, the proposed scheme achieves 37% of throughput improvement when the number of STAs per AP is two.

28 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission Summary Frame sequence for the proposed interference management technique in OBSS environment is presented. –Implicit feedback case –Explicit feedback case Throughput evaluation shows that the proposed interference management using transmit beamforming improves throughput performance in OBSS environment in both implicit and explicit feedback cases. July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 28

29 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 SubmissionSlide 29 References [1] Yusuke Asai, “Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS Environment,” Doc. IEEE802.11-10/0585r4. [2] Kentaro Nishimori, "Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios,"Doc. 11-09/1031r0 [3] Yuichi Morioka, “Why Implicit TxBF is better for TGac,” Doc. IEEE802.11-10/0818r0. [4] Michelle Gong, “DL MU MUMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results,” doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0567r1. [5] Koichi Ishihara, “CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming,” Doc. IEEE802.11-10/0806r1. Yusuke Asai (NTT) July 2010

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS."

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1355r2 11ah Submission Date: 2012-11-08 Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0839r0 Submission Slide 1S. Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. July 2010 DL MU-MIMO performance with QoS traffic and OBSS.

Doc.: IEEE /0839r0 Submission Slide 1S. Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. July 2010 DL MU-MIMO performance with QoS traffic and OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: 2010-03-15 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: 2010-05-15 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1186r2 September 2014 Pengfei Xia, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1186r2 September 2014 Pengfei Xia, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions.
EETS 8316 : WIRELESS NETWORKS Vamsi Krishna Medharametla 39873747.

EETS 8316 : WIRELESS NETWORKS Vamsi Krishna Medharametla
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date: 2013-07-15.

Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/1539r0 Submission Dec. 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Beam forming for 11ah Date: 2011-12-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1539r0 Submission Dec Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Beam forming for 11ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE 802.11ax Date: 2015-01-14 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in 802.11ax Date: 2014-09-11 Slide 1Huawei Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE 802.11ax Date: 2015-01-12 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: 2015-05-11 Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0333r0 March 2015 Oghenekome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Throughput Comparison of Some Multi-user Schemes in 802.11ax Date:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2015 Oghenekome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Throughput Comparison of Some Multi-user Schemes in ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: 2014-11-03 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: 2014-9-16 Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: 2014-07-14 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on 802.11ax OFDMA Date: 2014-09-17 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0053r0 Submission Jan. 2014 Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.

Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date: 2012-09-18.

Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: 2014-01-23 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:

Similar presentations

Ads by Google