1. Community-Based Participatory Research and Obesity among Pacific Islander Youth Vaka Faletau, MS Los Angeles County, Dept of Children & Family Services Sora Park Tanjasiri, DrPH, MPH California State University, Fullerton Asian Pacific Islander Obesity Prevention Alliance May 20, 2010

2. Disparities in Diabetes Mortality in California Denotes Healthy People 2010 Target (45.0 per 100,000) * Data from the California Department of Health Services, Sentinel Health Indicators for California’s Multicultural Populations, 1991-2001, CA: Center for Health Statistics, May 2004.

5. 2006 NHDR Findings: Considerable Data Gaps Remain for NHPIs  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2006 National Healthcare Disparities Report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; December 2006. AHRQ Pub. No. 07-0012.

6. California is home to over 221,458 Pacific Islanders* 2000 California Population AloneInclusive< HS deg < 100% FPL < 200% FPL Public Assist. Limited English Native Hawaiian20,57160,04814%11%27%5%3% Samoan37,49849,80422%20%45%12%17% Chamorro/ Guamanian20,91833,84920%10%29%6%9% Tongan12,11115,25240%18%44%10%32% NH Whites15,816,79016,538,49110%8%20%3% * U.S. Census, 2000

7. NCI Community Network Program (U01CA114591) Five year effort to increase cancer education, research and training for Pacific Islanders in Southern California

8. Population Sizes of Pacific Islanders in Southern California, 2000 WINCART community partners WINCART university partners 50,682 9,567 7,785 25,262 17,113

9. Community Organizations University Researchers Ainahau O Kaleponi Hawaiian Civic Club CA Chamorro Breast Cancer Survivors Alliance Guam Communications Network Orange County Asian and Pacific Islander Community Alliance Pacific Islander Health Partnership Samoan National Nurses Assoc Sons and Daughters of Guam Club Tongan Community Service Center/SSG Union of Pan Asian Communities California State University, Fullerton Claremont Graduate University University of California, Los Angeles University of California, Riverside University of California, San Diego University of Southern California Community- Based Participatory Research

10. CBPR Principles* Shared participation Cooperative engagement of community and university researchers in processes of co-learning Systems and capacity development Empowering processes that involve both research and action for community change * Israel, Parker, Becker (1998)

11. Physical Activity and Nutrition among Pacific Islander Youth (PANPY) 2 year study to assess the feasibility of a CBPR collaborative to identify obesity risk factors among Marshallese, Samoan and Tongan youth in Southern California Funded by the National Institute on Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

12. Protocol: DAY 1 Informed Consent/Assent Measure Height & Weight Complete Food Frequency Questionnaire Distribute Activity Monitors DAY 2 Collect Activity Monitors Complete the “Attitudes Toward Physical Activity” questionnaires

14. Methods: Food Frequency Questionnaire Provides information on “usual” dietary intake Our version was developed by the Cancer Research Center at the University of Hawai’i 160 food items listed Generally the most useful purpose is NOT to describe the diet of a group, but rather to compare low to medium to high intakes

16. Methods: Accelerometers

17. Sample Graph: Intensity Levels

18. Methods: Psychosocial Predictors of Physical Activity Questionnaire “Am I Able?” Physical Self-Worth Scale (Whitehead, 1995) Perceived Physical Competence (Harter, 1985) “Is It Worth It?” Liking of Games and Sports (Brustad, 1996; Smith, 1999) Fun of Physical Exertion (Brustad, 1996; Smith, 1999) Liking of Vigorous Exercise (Brustad, 1996; Smith, 1999) “Reinforcing Factors” Peer Acceptance Scale (Brustad, 1996) Parent Encouragement Scale (Brustad, 1996)

19. Methods: Psychosocial Predictors of Physical Activity

20. Results: Participant Profiles Community Sample Size AgeGender Total Sample 118 x = 15.98 SD = 1.85 52% male 48% female Tongan52 x = 15.53 SD = 1.54 48% male 52% female Marshallese28 x = 16.07 SD = 1.86 54% male 46% female Samoan38 x = 16.26 SD = 2.16 58% male 42% female

21. Results: Body Mass Index (BMI) CommunityMINMAXMeanSD Total Sample 16.5356.4930.648.75Tongan18.2955.3032.828.52 Marshallese16.5342.3823.805.24 Samoan18.5956.4932.078.71

22. Results: Average Duration of Physical Activity TotalMalesFemales Sedentary (min/day)508.1 + 120.5487.8 + 95.2529.3 + 140.4 Light (min/day)226.5 + 71.0283.4 + 68.2248.2 + 70.4 Moderate (min/day)35.3 + 24.945.4 + 25.924.7 + 18.9 Hard (mid/day)2.1 + 5.32.0 + 3.92.1 + 6.4

23. Results: Food Frequency Questionnaire

24. Results: Psychosocial Predictors of Physical Activity

25. What We Learned Participants should be encouraged to reduce overall caloric intake and % energy from fat and saturated fat Participants generally over-reported dietary intakes, including large portions (where as previous studies have shown under- reporting)

26. What We Learned Feasibility of Assessments With PI Youth

27. What We Learned Feasibility of Assessments With PI Youth Water-proof accelerometers should be designed to assess activities popular with P.I. such as surfing and water polo A shorter diet questionnaire should be considered to ensure accuracy A culture-specific questionnaire on physical activity attitudes is also needed

28. What We Learned Barriers to Physical Activity Involvement Limited access to SAFE, open areas Transportation is a barrier to getting places after school “We watch TV ‘cause it’s there…” Include physical activity at cultural or church events (volleyball, football, etc.) PI youth respect dedicated individuals, regardless of background Many PI youth are embarrassed by their body size (males)

29. Acknowledgements California State University, Fullerton –Jan Eichenauer –Colleen Kvaska –Archana McEligot –Lianne Nacpil –Sora Park Tanjasiri –Lenny Wiersma Pacific Islander Health Partnership –Greta & George Briand –Donny Faaliliu –Vaka Faletau –Joshua Finau –Ka’ala Pang Union of Pan Asian Communities –Jonathan “Tana” Lepule San Diego State University –Karen Moy This study was funded by the National Institute on Child Health and Human Development (grant R21 HD055192)

30. Thank you!