1. Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des mandataires agréés près l'Office européen des brevets based on presentation of Axel CASALONGA Chairman Litigation Committee An overview of the UPC draft based on presentation of Axel CASALONGA Chairman Litigation Committee 12th March 2014European Patent Institute1

2. Future EU patent system: Litigation system High quality Centralized Litigation Organization: High quality Harmonization Between regional / national courts Between EPO and Courts National /regional level courts: Access and support for SMEs by Attorneys at Law and EU patent attorneys in the countries Role EU Patent Attorneys important: Experience and training to deal with patents Link EPO with Court system 2 If we cannot get what we like, let us like what we can get Spanish proverb 12th March 2014European Patent Institute 2

3. Exclusive Juridiction Settlement of litigations related to - EP patents - Unitary patents Infringement, declaration of non infringement, Nullity, Provisional measures, Injunctions and damages Court common to the Contracting States Only Member states of the EU (excluding for example Switzerland) 12th March 2014European Patent Institute3

4. The Court Court of 1 st Instance - Local divisions (one or more in each country) - Regional divisions - one Central division: Paris and London/Munich for specific technical fields (June 2012): London: Chemical / Pharmaceutical; Munich: Mechanical Engineering Court of Appeal Register 12th March 2014European Patent Institute4

5. The Court Central Division Local Division Local Division Regional Division Regional Division 12th March 2014European Patent Institute5

6. Judges of 1st instance divisions Multinational panels of 3 judges Less experienced divisions: - one local judge - two judges from the pool of judges More experienced divisions: - two local judges - one judge from the pool of judges - one additional technical judge from the pool of judges   upon request of one party   or initiative of the panel Central division: - 2 legally qualified judges of different nationalities - 1 technical judge 12th March 2014European Patent Institute6

7. Judges of the Court of Appeal - 3 legally qualified judges of different nationalities - 2 technical judges 12th March 2014European Patent Institute7

8. Infringement acts Direct use: - making, offering, selling, using, importing or storing a patented product or using a patented process or offering, selling, using, importing or storing a product directly obtained by a patented process Indirect use: (contributory infringement) Limitations: - private or experimental uses - farmer privilege Exceptions: - prior use (national equivalence) - limited to each country 12th March 2014European Patent Institute8

9. Where to sue for infringement Before the local division hosted in the country of the infringement Or before the local division where one of the defendants is domiciled If defendant is outside the Contracting States, - before the local division of the infringement - or before the Central division (new proposal) In case of same actions engaged before several divisions, the division first seized is competent for the whole case The parties may agree to bring the action before the Central division 12th March 2014European Patent Institute9

10. Nullity actions Direct actions - must be brought before the Central division Counter claim for nullity - may be handled by the local division (joining infringement and nullity) with an additional technical judge - or referred to the Central division (the local division may stay the infringement proceedings or not) - or the entire case is referred to the Central division if the parties agree 12th March 2014European Patent Institute10

11. Production of evidence of infringement Order for inspection (saisie-contrefaçon): - may be issued ex parte - may be subject to the provision of a security - the inspection: by a person appointed by the Court / description / Taking of samples Order to produce evidence - if reasonable evidence already available Communication of information (origin, quantities, etc…) 12th March 2014European Patent Institute11

12. Provisional measures Preliminary injunction may be granted - with balance of interest of the parties 12th March 2014European Patent Institute12

13. Remedies Permanent injunction Damages (not punitive) Other corrective measures - recall from products - removal from commerce - destruction Period of limitation: 5 years 12th March 2014European Patent Institute13

14. Representation Lawyers Or European Patent Attorneys with appropriate qualification or European Litigation Certificate May be assisted by a patent attorney 12th March 2014European Patent Institute14

15. Financing Member states hosting divisions of 1 st Instance or Court of Appeal must provide facilities (premises, offices, IT equipment, support staff…) Court fees: - long term objective: self supporting Court - low or intermediate level of fees: Infringement: 6 000 € Revocation: 6 000 € Appeal: 9 000 € - supplemental fee if the value of the dispute exceeds 1 Mi€ 12th March 2014European Patent Institute15

16. Financing Contributions by the Member States on the basis of: - number of EP patents - or number of National litigations - or annual fees distribution for Unitary patent 12th March 2014European Patent Institute16

17. Link between UPC and Unitary Patent Entry into force of the UPC when 9 countries have ratified The Unitary patent should enter into force simultaneously The Unitary patent has unitary effect only in countries where the UPC is in force (transitional period) 12th March 2014European Patent Institute17

18. Transitional arrangements EP patent owners may choose National courts or UPC Transitional period: 7 years Possible prolongation: further 7 years 12th March 2014European Patent Institute18

19. Language of procedure 1. 1.Official language of the country hosting the local division 2. 2.Or one of EPO languages chosen by the country hosting the division 3. 3.Parties may agree to use the language of the granted patent if the panel approves - if not, the case may be referred to the Central Division 4. 4.On grounds of convenience and fairness: - language of the granted patent - at request of one party - or with agreement of both parties 12th March 2014European Patent Institute19

20. Status of discussions on UPC Representation by EPAs Comments on latest drafts for Rules of procedure 12th March 2014European Patent Institute20