Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Numerical Schemes for Streamer Discharges at Atmospheric Pressure

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Numerical Schemes for Streamer Discharges at Atmospheric Pressure"— Presentation transcript:

1 Numerical Schemes for Streamer Discharges at Atmospheric Pressure
Jean PAILLOL*, Delphine BESSIERES - University of Pau Anne BOURDON – CNRS EM2C Centrale Paris Pierre SEGUR – CNRS CPAT University of Toulouse Armelle MICHAU, Kahlid HASSOUNI - CNRS LIMHP Paris XIII Emmanuel MARODE – CNRS LPGP Paris XI STREAMER GROUP The Multiscale Nature of Spark Precursors and High Altitude Lightning Workshop May 9-13 – Leiden University - Nederland

2 Outline Plasma equations Integration – Finite Volume Method
Advection by second order schemes Limiters – TVD – Universal Limiter Higher order schemes – 3 and 5 – Quickest Numerical tests – advection Numerical tests – positive streamer Conclusion

3 Equations in one spatial dimension
2D schemes for discharge simulation real 2D schemes 2D = 1D + 1D (splitting) Coupled continuity equations Poisson equation

4 Advection equation – 1D S’ can be calculated apart (RK) and

5 Outline Plasma equations Integration – Finite Volume Method
Advection by second order schemes Limiters – TVD – Universal Limiter Higher order schemes – 3 and 5 – Quickest Numerical tests – advection Numerical tests – positive streamer Conclusion

6 Finite Volume Discretization
Computational cells t n+1 UPWIND n n-1 x i i i i i+2 i-3/ i-1/ i+1/ i+3/2 Control Volume

7 Integration and Integration over the control volume :
Introducing a cell average of N(x,t): then :

8 Integration and Integration over the control volume :
Introducing a cell average of N(x,t): then :

9 Integration and Integration over the control volume :
Introducing a cell average of N(x,t): then :

10 Flux approximation How to compute ? over Assuming that :

11 How to choose the approximated value ?
Flux approximation How to choose the approximated value ? 0th order 1st order Linear approximation xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x Control Volume

12 Advect exactly x tn+1 tn 1st order
xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x 1st order

13 Update averages [LeVeque]
1st order Note that : if and

14 Update averages [LeVeque]
1st order Note that : if and UPWIND scheme

15 Update averages [LeVeque]
1st order Note that : if and UPWIND scheme

16 ** Second order accurate
Approximated slopes Upwind * Beam-Warming ** Lax-Wendroff ** Fromm ** * First order accurate ** Second order accurate xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x

17 Numerical experiments [Toro]
ntotal = 401 w Periodic boundary conditions

18 After one advective period
Upwind Lax-Wendroff Beam-Warming Fromm

19 Outline Plasma equations Integration – Finite Volume Method
Advection by second order schemes Limiters – TVD – Universal Limiter Higher order schemes – 3 and 5 – Quickest Numerical tests – advection Numerical tests – positive streamer Conclusion

20 Slope Limiters f : correction factor How to find limiters ?
Smoothness indicator near the right interface of the cell How to find limiters ?

21 Total Variation Diminishing Schemes
TVD Methods ● Motivation First order schemes  poor resolution, entropy satisfying and non oscillatory solutions. Higher order schemes  oscillatory solutions at discontinuities. ● Good criterion to design “high order” oscillation free schemes is based on the Total Variation of the solution. ● Total Variation of the discrete solution : ● Total Variation of the exact solution is non-increasing  TVD schemes Total Variation Diminishing Schemes

22 TVD Methods ● Godunov’s theorem : No second or higher order accurate constant coefficient (linear) scheme can be TVD  higher order TVD schemes must be nonlinear. ● Harten’s theorem : TVD region

23 TVD Methods ● Sweby’s suggestion : 2nd order
Avoid excessive compression of solutions 2nd order

24 Second order TVD schemes
minmod superbee Woodward Van Leer

25 After one advective period
minmod Van Leer Woodward superbee

26 Universal Limiter [Leonard]
High order solution to be limited Ni+1 tn Ni+1/2 Ni ND NF Ni-1 NC NU xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x Control Volume

27 After one advective period
Fromm method associated with the universal limiter

28 Outline Plasma equations Integration – Finite Volume Method
Advection by second order schemes Limiters – TVD – Universal Limiter Higher order schemes – 3 and 5 – Quickest Numerical tests – advection Numerical tests – positive streamer Conclusion

29 Advect exactly x Finite Volume Discretization tn+1 tn
xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x tn tn+1

30 Integration [Leonard]
Assuming that y is known :

31 High order approximation of y*
function is determined at the boundaries of the control cell by numerical integration Yi+1 Yi Yi-1 tn Yi* Yi-2 dt.wi xi xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x Control Volume Polynomial interpolation of y(x) Yi*

32 High order approximation of y*
y* is determined by polynomial interpolation Polynomial order Interpolation points Numerical scheme 1 yi-1 yi UPWIND 2 yi-1 yi yi+1 Lax-Wendroff 2nd order 3 yi-2 yi-1 yi yi+1 QUICKEST 3 (Leonard) 3rd order 5 yi-3 yi-2 yi-1 yi yi+1 yi+2 QUICKEST 5 (Leonard) 5th order …… …… ……

33 Universal Limiter applied to y* [Leonard]
y(x) is a continuously increasing function (monotone) Yi+1 dt.wi tn Yi* Yi Yi-1 Yi-2 xi xi-3/ xi xi-1/ xi xi+1/ xi xi+3/2 x

34 Outline Plasma equations Integration – Finite Volume Method
Advection by second order schemes Limiters – TVD – Universal Limiter Higher order schemes – 3 and 5 – Quickest Numerical tests – advection Numerical tests – positive streamer Conclusion

35 Numerical advection tests
● Ncell = 401, after 5 periods ● Ncell = 401, after 500 periods MUSCL superbee MUSCL Woodward QUICKEST QUICKEST 5

36 Ncell = 1601, after 500 periods MUSCL superbee MUSCL Woodward QUICKEST QUICKEST 5

37 Celerity depending on the x axis
over

38 Celerity depending on the x axis
over

39 Celerity depending on the x axis
over Quickest 5 Quickest 3 After 500 periods Woodward Initial profile x

40 Outline Plasma equations Integration – Finite Volume Method
Advection by second order schemes Limiters – TVD – Universal Limiter Higher order schemes – 3 and 5 – Quickest Numerical tests – advection Numerical tests – positive streamer Conclusion

41 Positive streamer propagation
Plan to plan electrode system [Dahli and Williams] streamer Cathode Anode E=52kV/cm radius = 200µm ncell=1200 x=0 x=1cm 1014cm-3 Initial electron density 108cm-3 x=0 x=1cm x=0.9cm

42 Positive streamer propagation
Charge density (C) 2ns Zoom UPWIND x=0 x=1cm

43 Positive streamer propagation
Charge density (C) 2ns Zoom UPWIND x=0 x=1cm Charge density (C) 4ns Woodward Quickest Zoom superbee minmod

44 High order schemes may be useful
Conclusion Is it worth working on accurate scheme for streamer modelling ? YES ! especially in 2D numerical simulations Advection tests Error (%) 0.78 3.8 3.41 26.5 22.77 Number of cells 1601 401 201 Quickest 5 Quickest 3 TVD minmod High order schemes may be useful

45


Download ppt "Numerical Schemes for Streamer Discharges at Atmospheric Pressure"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google