1. Conformity Assessment Overview Nuclear Energy Standards Coordinating Collaborative November 2009 Gordon Gillerman Chief Standards Services Division National Institute of Standards and Technology gordon.gillerman@nist.gov

2. SSD Service Overview Assist US Federal Government Agencies and industry in developing conformity policies and administrative infrastructure Design and assist in the implementation of related conformity assessment programs

3. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Directs NIST to: NTTAA (13) to coordinate Federal, State, and local technical standards activities and conformity assessment activities, with private sector technical standards activities and conformity assessment activities, with the goal of eliminating unnecessary duplication and complexity in the development and promulgation of conformity assessment requirements and measures.

4. Conformity Assessment “demonstration that specified requirements relating to a product, process, system, person or body are fulfilled” ISO/IEC 17000

5. Helpful Terminology The parties – who does what? Conformity Assessment can be conducted by: first party – seller or manufacturer second party – purchaser or user third party – an independent entity that has no interest in transactions between the 1 st and 2 nd parties government – has a unique role in regulation, but is the second party in procurement

6. Types of Conformity Assessment Supplier’s Declaration Inspection Testing Certification Registration Accreditation

7. Advocate use of appropriate conformity assessment tools with their international norms Supplier’s Declaration Inspection Testing Certification Registration Accreditation ISO/IEC 17050 parts 1 and 2 ISO/IEC 17020 ISO/IEC 17025 ISO/IEC Guide 65 ISO/IEC 17021 ISO/IEC 17011

8. Typical Use – Testing (1 st, 2 nd or 3 rd Party CA) Used when the critical characteristics can be evaluated via measurement under specified conditions. Type test is a test carried out on samples that represent production for the purpose of determining conformity. May be an element of a suppliers’ declaration or certification system. ISO/IEC 17025

9. Typical Use – Suppliers Declaration (1 st Party CA) Generally used: when the risk associated with noncompliance is low there are adequate penalties for placing noncompliant products on the market there are adequate mechanisms to remove noncompliant products from the market ISO/IEC 17050 parts 1 and 2

10. Typical Use –Certification (3 rd Party CA) Used when the risks associated with non-conformity are moderate to high. Includes evaluation, compliance decision, attestation of conformity and some form of surveillance or follow up. Always conducted by a third party. ISO/IEC Guide 65

11. Typical Use - Accreditation Used to assess and ensure/enhance ongoing conformity assessment body and program for competence, management and technical requirements. Used to attain needed confidence in laboratory testing operation and results. Used to attain needed confidence in certification system. ISO/IEC 17011

12. Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Surveillance Used to ensure/enhance ongoing conformity. Key part of certification or registration system. For products pre-market and post-market Announced or unannounced Inspection, testing and audits are among commonly used methods Frequency and rigor should be balanced with the costs (direct and indirect) and confidence needs. Typically resource intensive

13. Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Ingredients for a CA Program Scope Requirements – Test methods – Classifications and/or pass/fail criteria – Test Reports….. CA Process – Accreditation requirements Facilities – Labs – Certifiers….

14. Factors in CA System Design The risks associated with non-compliance should be proportional to the rigor and independence of the CA system. System over-design will add too much cost. System Under-design will result in too little confidence of compliance. Penalties associated with non-compliance may reduce the needed rigor and independence of the conformity assessment system. Timely mechanisms that effectively remove non-compliant products from the market may also reduce the needed rigor and independence of the system.

15. Risk and Conformity Assessment How much confidence is needed? Perceived Risk Independence and Rigor of Conformity Assessment Supplier’s declaration 1 st party conformity assessment certification 3 rd party conformity assessment

16. TIA TSCP Toy Safety Certification Program - Draft Accredited certification organization Test results from accredited lab Initial type test Periodic Retest Factory production process management system certification from accredited registrar Initial assessment Audits Periodic reassessments Design hazard analysis attestation from applicant Program administrator certification mark owner License agreement for certification mark Authorization to mark certified products Applicant and model designation on publicly availably list results documentation results