Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lessons Learned: Actionable Recommendations From the Field Wisconsin Graduation Summit March 2, 2010 Sandra Covington Smith, Ph.D. National Dropout Prevention.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lessons Learned: Actionable Recommendations From the Field Wisconsin Graduation Summit March 2, 2010 Sandra Covington Smith, Ph.D. National Dropout Prevention."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Lessons Learned: Actionable Recommendations From the Field Wisconsin Graduation Summit March 2, 2010 Sandra Covington Smith, Ph.D. National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University

3 2 National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities A national specialty center funded by OSEP to support the states in increasing school completion rates for students with disabilities First funded by OSEP in January 2004 Re-funded by OSEP in January 2009 Project officer – Dr. Selete Avoke

4 NDPC-SD Mission Established in 2004 by OSEP to build capacity to improve school completion rates for students with disabilities Committed to providing evidence-based technical assistance to help states design and implement effective dropout prevention programs www.ndpc-sd.org 3

5 4 NDPC-SD Assists States… Identifying evidence-based dropout prevention interventions, programs, and practices Producing evidence-based knowledge that is useful to school practitioners Providing targeted technical assistance to states in a variety of formats

6 5 NDPC-SD Assists States… Establishing collaborative partnerships with TA&D network partners and other organizations to leverage resources and help states build coordinated systems that improve post-school outcomes Disseminating dropout prevention information through multiple methods and efficient use of a variety of technologies

7 6 OUR IMPACT  Improved awareness and understanding through increased access to evidence-based dropout prevention practices, interventions, and programs  Increased state capacity to address dropout issues through development of a data–driven framework and provision of direct technical assistance, capacity building forums, and consultation to SEAs and LEAs  Expanded state and local practices through intense technical assistance and coaching on the development of model sites that will serve as exemplars that others can replicate

8 According to the Research Dropout Prevention for Students with Disabilities

9 Setting the Context (d)(1)(A) to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living.

10 Within Context The keystone concept of an “individualized education program (IEP)” of special education and related services tailored to one’s unique needs and limitations while bestowing meaningful educational benefit can only survive if such an opportunity proves effective at keeping more youth in school until they graduate (Bakken & Kortering, 2000).

11 Our Challenge For All Students Linking what we know about effective dropout prevention strategies to improve secondary transition programs that lead to improved outcomes. Research Practice Compliance

12 11 Lessons Learned -What Do We Know & What Have We Learned-

13 LESSONS LEARNED Causes  Problem behaviors coupled with academic difficulties or prior academic failures are key risk factors that are predictive of school dropout.  Repeated use of exclusionary discipline practices, such as suspension, has been identified as one of the major factors contributing to dropout.  High absenteeism and retention are serious risk factors for dropping out that can be monitored by schools.  The most accurate predictor of a student’s school achievement is the extent to which his/her family encourages learning.  Academic progress and school completion are not equally distributed across disability, income, or ethnicity.

14 13 Factors that Impact School Completion Improved School Completion Rates Adequate Attendance Appropriate Social Behaviors Course Performance /Academic Engagement Decreased Dropout Rates Effective Transition Services

15 LESSONS LEARNED Consequences  Students have to be present and engaged in order to learn. That is why the discovery that thousands of our youngest students are academically at-risk because of extended absences when they first embark upon their school careers is as remarkable as it is consequential.  Dropouts are more likely than high school graduates to need the support of living with parents in early adulthood, experience health problems, engage in criminal activities, and become dependent on welfare and other government programs.  Three to five years after dropping out, the cumulative arrest rate for youth with SED is 73%.

16 15 Desired Outcomes Knowledge Transfer Increased Understanding Expanded practices Improved capacity Increased School Completion

17 LESSONS LEARNED Prevention/Intervention  Establish a leadership team to actively coordinate implementation of dropout prevention efforts  Establish systems for routine monitoring of risk indicators associated with dropout  Create a local action team to analyze data and address dropout prevention at the local level  Intervene early, often as early as preschool  Increase family engagement and school involvement  Create school environments that are inviting, safe, and supportive  Focus on effective instruction  Listen to students  Administrators are key and their support is essential  Use proven practices

18 17 All youth ready for college, career, ind. living & active civic participation Positive Behaviors (Behavioral Engagement) and Outcomes (Social Engagement) Integrated System of High Standards, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessments, and Support (Cognitive Engagement) Accountable Leaders Empowered Educators Personalized Learning Environments (Psychological Engagement) Academic Success (Academic Engagement) SUCCESS FOR ALL STUDENTS

19 Lessons Learned Recovery/Re-entry Some students will dropout, often as early as MS. As early as grade K, differences exist between graduates and dropouts. Dropouts appear to exhibit differential capabilities in comparison with graduates as early as kindergarten (e.g., academic deficits, absenteeism at critical stages, and academic retention). It is never too late to recover a student who has exited school informally. Case management type services should be provided and their re-entry should be celebrated. Students should be introduced to an alternative path, if it is there only option to positive post school outcomes.

20 Implement practical strategies to recover students. It’s never too late! 10/19/201519 Inform students that they are always welcome. Positive relationships will pay off! A case management approach should be considered. Problem solving and relationship building strategies remain key as students return. Celebrate!

21 LESSONS LEARNED Capacity Building  Take a systemic approach to address dropout prevention  Conduct causal analysis  Use data to guide program development, professional development, and other school improvement efforts  Consider multiple levels of implementation  Examine the influence of other performance indicators on school completion  Promote and implement evidence-based practices and strategies

22 Formula for Good Outcomes Effective intervention practices + Effective implementation practices = Good outcomes for Youth with Disabilities 21 http://www.ldonline.org/multimedi a#psa

23 22 Understanding Dropout: A Process of Disengagement

24 Middle School Predictors of Dropout (Balfanz & Herzog, 2005; 2006) 1.The four strongest predictors – determined by the end of sixth grade 1.Poor attendance (14%) 2.Failing English (16%) 3.Poor behavior (17%) 4.Failing math (21%) 2.Sixth graders who do not attend school regularly, receive poor behavior marks, or fail math or English  10% chance of graduating on time  20% chance of graduating a year late 23

25 24 Middle School Predictors of Dropout (Balfanz & Herzog, 2005; 2006) 3.Students who repeated middle school grades are 11 times more likely to drop out than students who had not repeated 4.A student who is retained two grades increases their risk of dropping out of high school by 90% (Roderick, 1995). 5.Transition between schools  Middle school/junior high school to high school

26 25 What the Research Tells Us Prevention and Intervention

27 26 Improving Outcomes: Addressing Dropout Prevention: Actionable Recommendations

28 1. The Solution Begins with YOU 1 “We will never be able to turn the tide on the graduation crisis in this country if we don’t take the time to engage young people and their counsel as part of the solution.” America’s Promise Alliance ACTION: Assign adult advocates, to students at risk of dropping out

29 28 Address Alterable Variables School-level alterable variables associated with school completion for students with disabilities (Wagner, Blackorby & Hebeler, 1993) – Providing direct, individualized tutoring and support to complete homework assignments – Providing support to attend class, and stay focused on school – Participation in vocational education classes – Participation in community-based work experience programs and training for competitive employment

30 29 Focus on Interventions That Work Strategies that are focused on student engagement Interventions that occur over time, usually months or years Interventions that involve a family or parent component Interventions that are strength based and involve a variety of contexts

31 30 Program Development & Support Promote and facilitate the implementation of evidence-based strategies that : – Promote school attendance – Promote academic success – Promote prosocial behaviors – Promote a positive school climate – Increase student engagement – Increase parental involvement

32 2. Promote High School Graduation For All Students 3. Invest Drop Out Prevent Initiatives in a Place of Authority 4.Examine and Expand Present Policies That Effect School Completion 5.Seek Youth At Risk of Dropping Out 6.Utilize Data Systems That Support A Realistic Diagnostic of the Number of Students Who Drop Out and That Help Identify Individual Students At High Risk of Dropping Out (diagnostics) 7.Provide Academic Support and Enrichment To Improve Academic Performance 8. Personalize the Learning Environment and instructional process

33 9.Provide rigorous and relevant instruction to better engage students in learning and provide the skills needed to graduate and to serve them after they leave school 10. Implement programs to Improve Students’ Classroom Behavior and Social Skills 11. Promote the Importance of Attendance – Every Day Counts! 12.Reengage Youth Who Have Dropped Out of School 13.Implement services to connect and engage parents in school completion initiatives (present data in parent- friendly format) 14.Provide Rigorous, Relevant, Options for Earning a High School Diploma

34 33 CONSIDER GRADUATION AS THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE OUTCOME!!

35 CONTACT INFORMATION: Sandra Covington Smith, PhD Coordinator of Technical Assistance & Training Senior Research Associate sandras@clemson.edu Clemson University 209 Martin Street Clemson, SC 29640 864-656-1817 www.ndpc-sd.org sandras@clemson.edu www.ndpc-sd.org 34 © 20010 Clemson University – All rights reserved


Download ppt "Lessons Learned: Actionable Recommendations From the Field Wisconsin Graduation Summit March 2, 2010 Sandra Covington Smith, Ph.D. National Dropout Prevention."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google