Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SAW-Based RFID for NASA Ground Facilities and Planetary Habitats Patrick W. Fink/Richard Barton October 13, 2008.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SAW-Based RFID for NASA Ground Facilities and Planetary Habitats Patrick W. Fink/Richard Barton October 13, 2008."— Presentation transcript:

1 SAW-Based RFID for NASA Ground Facilities and Planetary Habitats Patrick W. Fink/Richard Barton October 13, 2008

2 Contributors Phong Ngo G. D. Arndt, Ph.D. Julia Gross Chau Phan David Ni, Ph.D. John Dusl Kent Dekome Patrick Fink, Ph.D. Timothy Kennedy, Ph.D. Richard Barton, Ph.D. Greg Lin Emal Latifzai Robert Williams Yasser Haridi Kent Byerly, Ph.D. (Spatial Acuity) George Studor Robert Brocato (Sandia National Laboratories)

3 Courtesy RFSAW, Inc. Courtesy AirGATE Technologies NASA Use of 2.4 ISM SAW-Based RFID

4 SAW RFID – Sample Waveform

5 Initial Passive, Wireless Sensor Applications Major Challenges – For NASA sensor applications, often want many tags within interrogator field-of-view – Ranges > 100 feet are desired for many applications – Primary SAW material in use is very sensitive to temperature Good for temperature sensing, but makes other sensors more challenging Combination of these challenges prompted early applications based on: – Larger aperture interrogators + adaptive digital beamforming – Temperature sensing applications

6 Waveform Correlation to Determine Temperatures and IDs Measured response – Composite signal from multiple tags + noise Template response Waveform obtained by a priori measurement Analytically modified by range and temperature Correlation matrix formed from measured response and modified template responses Need to determine effect of non-zero cross-correlations on temperature and range accuracies Measured tag delay with temperature

7 Correlation simulation - background 40-bit Global SAW Tag (GST) tags from RFSAW, Inc. Simulation based on measured tag responses with simulated additive, white Gaussian noise; SNR = 20 dB Composite signal formed from summation of 11 tag responses – All tags have same energy (suspected worst case) – Tags assumed at different ranges and temperatures 2D correlation process – Straightforward entire waveform correlation Suitable for RFID/sensor interrogation in which all IDs are known a priori – 21 time scale increments representing 105 C range – 21 time delay increments representing 210 ns range

8 Correlation simulation – results (11 tags) Tag 1873 correlated with noise, only. Tag 1873 correlated with composite signal + noise. Tag 1873 – strongest correlation in population

9 Successive interference cancellation required Tag 1858 correlated with Tag 1873 present: false peaks. Tag 1858 correlated after subtracting estimate of Tag 1873: correct peak is identified. Tag 1858 – 2 nd strongest correlation in 11 tag population

10 Correlation Simulation Results Preliminary error statistics for 11-tag population: – Error in delay Mean: 0.53 ns Std. Dev.: 1.5 ns – Error in dilation Mean: -0.09 °C Std. Dev.: 0.21 °C More simulations and tests required for statistical significance Need to determine error dependencies upon number of tags in population

11 Spatial Diversity to Isolate Sensor Clusters Collision avoidance plan: Correlations used to isolate tags within defined clusters Virtual (digital) beamforming limits collision from adjacent clusters

12 72-element Interrogation in Anechoic Chamber

13 Direction of Arrival in Anechoic Environment

14 Spatial diversity for collision avoidance [ Before – 2 tag responses – to be added] [ After – single tag response recovered ]

15 Operation in KSC Cryogenics Laboratory

16 Direction-of-Arrival: Two tags in clutter

17 Applications – Lunar Outpost Telemetry – Monitor tool exposure limits: temperature, shock, etc. – MMOD impact detection and location – Chemical and atmospheric sensing RFID Tag

18 Applications – Lunar Outpost Navigation – Lunar landing aids – Lunar “road signs” or “breadcrumbs” – Passive tag tracking RFID Tag Tracking

19 JSC Chamber A (Vacuum & Thermal Cycle) Application: Environmental Facility Wireless Sensors Adaptive interrogation of wireless temperature and pressure sensors Goals: T low = 20K; 100s of T-sensors; 10s of pressure sensors JSC Chamber A T-sensor configuration on inner shroud

20 Sensor coverage schemes for Chamber A Coverage from wall-based interrogators Coverage from floor-based interrogators

21 Next Wave of Passive, Wireless Sensor Applications Additional Challenges – Desire to integrate calibrated, passive commercial sensors with SAW devices Acceleration, acoustic emission sensors are primary targets – Still need many tags within interrogator field-of-view and long ranges – Sample rates significantly higher than our temperature applications: > 10 kHz, compared to 1-3 Hz

22 SNL Concept to Incorporate Commercial Sensors Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) concept: FET-loading of SAW IDT with passive sensor driving FET Interdigital Transducers (IDTs) Passive sensor types under evaluation: accelerometer, acoustic emission

23 Application Example: White Sands Test Facility

24 5 4 3... 2 1 Application Example: Monitoring Cryogenic Fill Level SAW Tag Temperature Sensors


Download ppt "SAW-Based RFID for NASA Ground Facilities and Planetary Habitats Patrick W. Fink/Richard Barton October 13, 2008."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google