Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ISO The success of ISO – Universal financial Industry

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ISO The success of ISO – Universal financial Industry"— Presentation transcript:

1 ISO 20022 The success of ISO 20022 – Universal financial Industry
message scheme This presentation is scripted. ISO_20022_SV_v100

2 ISO 20022 The ISO recipe for all financial messages
ISO Universal financial industry message scheme, the recipe: syntax neutral business modelling methodology syntax specific design rules industry led development/registration process financial repository on reverse engineering approach to ease coexistence ISO is not a suite of message standards but a recipe proposed by ISO to develop message standards for all domains of the financial industry. The recipe contains the ingredients shown. The most innovative characteristic of ISO is its modelling methodology which decouples the business standard from the physical message formats. The models evolve with the business, while the formats evolve with the technology to benefit from the latest innovations with regard to automation, ease of implementation, openness and cheapness of products, etc. This ISO recipe offers a better, cheaper and faster way of developing and implementing message standards. The syntax specific design rules cover the conversion of message models to XML (eXtended Markup Language) or ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One) schemas. The combination of the first and last ingredients (the business modelling methodology and the reverse engineering approach) makes the ISO recipe a unique development tool kit. It proposes a single target (convergence) while offering at the same time a tool to ease interoperability with other existing message sets (coexistence). ISO_20022_SV_v100

3 Why ISO 20022? Supports convergence and co-existence
IFX ISO 15022 MDDL TWIST FIX FpML Message model IFX TWIST When standards are developed independently of each other, ‘translating’ from one standard to another requires to map data directly from one application to another and vice-versa. This is costly, unscalable and difficult to implement and maintain. Each time you add a new standard to support, it increases the complexity and cost exponentially. Using a single message model as a master model reduces the translation effort since each standard only needs to translate to the master to ensure a link with any other standard. Such an approach of developing syntax-independent business models is the core of the ISO standard… Longer term, the physical ISO messages generated from the model would become the one and only standard we are looking for. While getting there, the message model helps co-existence. Furthermore, if it is more efficient to use another syntax for a particular business area or a particular market segment, starting from the ISO message models to generate the messages in this other syntax ensures that the business information will flow smoothly from one message to another whichever the syntax used to transport this business information. Message model MDDL FpML FIX Long term we want one standard, but in the interim several standards need to co-exist… ISO_20022_SV_v100

4 Why ISO 20022? Convergence in the cooperative space
Competitive Space Cooperative Space Competitive Space High Value Payments: RTGS, EURO1 and CHIPS Financial Institutions Financial Institutions FX and Money Markets: Rule Books, CLS Public Admini- strators Commercial Payments: Rule Books, Clearing Houses, Processors Public Admini- strators The ISO standardisation effort takes place in the cooperative space. As such it allows all financial players to maintain their competitive edge. Bank A Bank B Cards: Rule Books, Card Schemes, Cards Processors Corporates Corporates Tradefacilitation: ICC Rule Books, e-invoicing SME’s SME’s Cash: NCB rules, Industry Standards Merchants Merchants Securities: Rule Books, Exchanges, CCP’s CSD’s, Standardisation Consumers Consumers Certification & Networks: SWIFT Cooperative space for business rules Cooperative space for standards ISO_20022_SV_v100

5 The ISO 20022 recipe - For whom? Potential users and developers
communities of users looking for interoperability and more cost-effective communications Message development organisations: ACORD, ANBIMA, ASF, Berlin Group, BIAN, CBI Consortium, Early Warning Services, FPL, FpML, IFX Forum, nexo A.I.S.B.L (formerly EPASOrg), OAGi, SWIFT, Tieto, TWIST, XBRL, etc. Market Infrastructures (MIs): China Foreign Exchange Trade System, China UnionPay, Clearstream, CLS, DTCC, EBA, ECB-Banque de France-Banco de España-Deutsche Bundesbank, Euroclear, FED, Omgeo, Target, T2S, etc. International or national standards setters: Danish Bankers Association, EPC, Federation of Finnish Financial Services (FFI), ISITC, ISO WGs, Payments UK, Russian Corporate Market Practice Group (RUCMPG), UN/CEFACT, etc. To whom is the ISO recipe targeted? The ISO platform is available to all developers of message standards (they don’t need to be affiliated to ISO). And the ISO message standards are freely and publicly available to all communities of users. The goal is to attract all developers of financial message standards. They will continue to focus on their domain of expertise and keep their Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the ISO compliant messages they develop while all together offering the community a range of messages in the same language, as if they were developed by a single body. The organisations ‘in yellow’ on the slide have already engaged in ISO message development. Market infrastructures (ACHs, RTGS, [I]CSDs, etc.) are adopting and pushing developers to embrace the ISO standard for the benefit of their common customers. Industry initiatives and regulatory requirements, such as the European e-Invoicing initiative, SEPA, Target2-Securities, Giovannini and MiFID, which all look for open standards to support their harmonisation of business practices, are all recommending adoption of ISO 20022… There are also catalysts for interoperability and convergence, such as SEPA, T2S, Giovannini, MiFID, e-Invoicing ISO_20022_SV_v100

6 ISO 20022 The registration bodies
Registration Management Group - RMG (Overall governance) 64 senior managers from 21 countries and 11 international organisations Standards Evaluation Groups – SEGs (User representatives) Securities (58 experts, 16 countries, 7 organisations) Payments (64 experts, 18 countries, 6 organisations) Cards and related retail financial services (34 experts, 14 countries, 5 organisations) Trade Services (33 experts, 13 countries, 1 organisation) Forex (24 experts, 9 countries, 3 organisations) Technical Support Group – TSG (ISO technical advisors) 25 experts from 10 countries and 4 international organisations Registration Authority – RA (Maintaining ISO repository) The industry is directly involved in the acceptance, review and evaluation of candidate ISO messages submitted by the submitting organisations. The Registration Management Group (RMG) is the highest registration body. It is made up of senior industry experts nominated by ISO countries and international organisations in liaison with ISO. All together, they represent all sectors of the financial industry. The role of the RMG is to promote and support the involvement of financial service actors to facilitate the registration and maintenance of high quality globally relevant ISO compliant business models for exchange of information for financial services. Its mission is to ensure that ISO is a trusted standard providing high quality business models for exchange of information for financial services. The RMG monitors the overall registration process. It approves the business justifications introduced by submitting organisations that want to develop new ISO messages. It also initiates the creation of the Standards Evaluation Groups (SEGs). The Standards Evaluation Groups (SEGs) are groups of industry experts nominated by ISO countries and liaison organisations, which each represents the future users of ISO messages in a particular financial domain. Their role is to ensure that the candidate ISO messages actually address the needs of the future users. The Technical Support Group (TSG) is composed of technical experts nominated by ISO countries and liaison organizations, who can advise the submitting organizations and the other ISO registration bodies on technical matters related to the use of the ISO recipe, e.g., modelling guidelines, usage of XML or ASN.1, repository management, impact of innovations, etc. The Registration Authority (RA) is the guardian of the ISO financial repository. SWIFT has been nominated by ISO to provide the RA services. The RA supports the submitting organisations in their development effort, ensures compliance of the developed models and performs the transformation of message models into compliant ASN.1 or XML schemas. The RA is also responsible for the maintenance of the ISO website ( which contains detailed information on the ISO message portfolio and the status of all ISO projects. The RMG and the first two SEGs were initiated in 2005 and the next two SEGs in 2006, while the last SEG and the TSG were created in As you can see from the figures on the slide, ISO is quite successful in attracting the interest of the industry worldwide. ISO_20022_SV_v100

7 ISO 20022 The registration process Development Process
Submitting organisation Financial organisation or standards body Business justification Business justification RMG Project approval & allocation to a SEG This is an illustration of the process for development and registration of new sets of messages. There is a more detailed description of it on The entry point of the registration process is the preparation of a ‘Business Justification’ by the organisation that wants to develop the messages (the “submitting organisation”). The Business Justification must describe the high level scope of the messages to be developed and the reason why they are expected to benefit the industry. The Business Justification is reviewed by the SEGs and the RMG. The RMG will decide whether the proposed development fits into the ISO spectrum, does not duplicate the already existing messages and is indeed beneficial to the community. If the request is approved, the RMG decides which SEG(s) will be in charge of the evaluation of the messages, once developed. The submitting organisation develops ISO compliant business and message models. The RA assists the submitting organisation during this phase in order to ensure that the models are compliant and use the right components from the Data Dictionary. If need be, the RA may create additional dictionary items. When the development is completed, the RA generates the ISO XML or ASN.1 schemas and prepares a comprehensive documentation for the SEG. Based on this documentation, the SEG(s) evaluates the candidate ISO messages. The main goal of the SEG(s) is to get the buy-in of the future users from a business perspective. The submitting organisation is participating to the evaluation to help the SEG understand the proposed solution and address any question that would be raised by the SEG members. When/if the SEG approves the messages, the RA proceeds to the official registration of the message components in the ISO Data Dictionary and publishes the new ‘ISO messages’ in the Catalogue of messages on When messages are first piloted or implemented, first users are invited to comment on the ‘technical implementability’ of the messages and the accuracy of the documentation published on the website. Possible changes or corrections requested by first implementers will be evaluated by the SEG, the RA and the submitting organisation and may lead to changes to the messages and/or documentation. All along, the RMG monitors the work and if need be, arbitrates any disputes. Once the Business Justification is approved by the RMG, and as long as the messages have not been approved by the SEG, the messages are called ‘candidate ISO messages’. Once they are approved by the SEG for publication, the messages are called ‘ISO messages’ or ‘ISO compliant messages’. Candidate ISO messages Submitting organisation & RA Development & provisional registration SEG Business validation ISO messages Official registration and publication RA Repository Dictionary Catalogue Optional pilot testing or first implementers Submitter & users ISO_20022_SV_v100

8 ISO 20022 registration process Yearly maintenance process
Timing By June 1 Users introduce Change Requests to the RA Users CRs SEG SEG screens Change Requests (CRs) By July 7 Submitting organisation prepares ‘Maintenance Change Request’ with each CR implementation By August 21 Submitting organisation Once approved, the ISO messages can be maintained upon request of the users. The ISO maintenance process is described at The yearly maintenance cycle includes the following steps: 1) All Change Requests (CRs) are to be sent to the RA by June 1 using a “Change Request Template” . Anybody can introduce a CR. All received CRs are published in the Catalogue of Change Requests ( 2) Valid CRs received prior to June 1 are evaluated by the SEG(s) that approved the initial version of the messages. Purpose of this initial evaluation is to eliminate the CRs that are not worth investigating further and to decide whether CRs that are worth considering should be implemented in the upcoming yearly maintenance cycle or can wait for another year. 3) Selected CRs for the upcoming cycle are forwarded to the submitting organisation in charge of the maintenance of the messages for investigation. This results in a “Maintenance Change Request” document describing how each change request could be implemented. The Maintenance Change Requests are published in the Status of Submissions ( 4) The SEG reviews the Maintenance Change Request and approves or rejects each of the CRs. 5) The submitting organisation develops new versions of the messages incorporating the approved CRs. 6) The SEG validates that the new versions indeed include the approved changes. 7) The approved new versions of messages are published by the RA. 8) The first implementers of the new versions are invited to comment on the ‘technical implementability’ of the messages and the accuracy of the documentation published on the website. Possible changes or corrections requested by first implementers will be evaluated by the SEG, the RA and the submitting organisation and may lead to changes to the messages and/or documentation. If approved by the SEG, this maintenance cycle can be used in a ‘fast-track’ mode in case of urgent Change Requests that cannot wait for the next yearly cycle. SEG By October 1 SEG approval/rejection By December 1 Submitting organisation & RA Development of new versions SEG Validation of new versions By February 1 RA Registration and publication Repository Dictionary Catalogue April-May First implementers Submitting organisation & users ISO_20022_SV_v100

9 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (1/11) Payments
Credit Transfers / Direct Debits / Mandates Financial Investigations Exceptions & Investigations Change/Verify Account Identification Creditor Payment Activation Request Authorities Debtor’s bank Cash Management Creditor’s bank Account Switching This is an overview of the current ISO offering to support the Payments market. The picture shows the various flows of information exchanged by the parties to initiate, execute and report the execution of a payment. The yellow arrows are already covered by approved ISO messages, while the blue arrows are still candidate ISO messages. In September 2005, the Payments SEG approved the very first set of ISO messages covering the area of ‘customer to bank credit transfer initiation’, which included the so-called ‘core payment kernel’ developed jointly by SWIFT, TWIST, IFX and OAGi. In June 2006, the SEG approved a new version of the payment initiation messages, including direct debits as well as the interbank direct debit and credit transfer messages. The interbank messages were developed by SWIFT. In July 2006, the SEG approved a set of messages developed by SWIFT to cover exceptions and investigations in the payments area. In March 2007, the SEG approved 3 bank to customer advice and statement messages developed jointly by SWIFT, TWIST, IFX, OAGi and ISITC. In March 2009, the SEG approved a new version of the whole ISO Payments message set, to accommodate change requests received from the user base. In August 2009, the SEG approved four Mandate messages developed by SWIFT to initiate and maintain payment mandates. In December 2009, the SEG approved a set of 3 messages developed by the the French SWIFT Users Group to inform payment initiators of a change in the account identification of their counterpart or verify the account of the beneficiary before instructing a payment. In March 2010, the SEG approved 15 Bank Account Management messages developed by SWIFT to enable corporate clients to open a bank account with their bank and maintain related data. In September 2010, the SEG approved a set of 2 messages developed by the CBI Consortium to enable creditors to request debtors to initiate a credit transfer in their favour. In November 2010, the SEG approved a set of 4 Cash Account Reporting Request and Notification to Receive messages developed by SWIFT. In May 2012, the SEG approved a Bank Services Billing message developed by TWIST and SWIFT. In October 2012, the SEG approved 3 Authorities Financial Investigations messages developed by the Federation of Finnish Financial Services (FFI) (not represented on the slide). In April 2014, the SEG approved two Stand-Alone Remittance Advice messages developed by IFX and OAGi. The following business justifications have been approved by the RMG and will complement the approved messages: a whole suite of candidate cash management messages developed by SWIFT. They will include ‘query/answer’ messages to retrieve information about cash accounts and transaction, as well as interbank statement and advice messages an interbank Financial Institution Direct Debit proposed by SWIFT to complement the ‘Payments Clearing and Settlement message set. Account Switching by Payments UK. Cross-border Transactions Currency Control Reporting (CTCCR) by the Russian Corporate Market Practice Group. Real Time Payments by Payments UK (on hold) Mandate Status List by the Danish Bankers Association. Payment Pre-Authorization (PaPA) by Early Warning Services. The last 4 projects are not represented on the slide. Account Switching Exceptions & Investigations ISO 20022 Advice & Statement Change/Verify Account Identification Bank Account Management Creditor Payment Activation Request Account Reporting Request Notification to Receive Mandates Credit Transfer Initiation Advice & Statement Exceptions & Investigations Creditor Payment Activation Request Stand-Alone Remittance Advice Direct Debit Initiation Stand-Alone Remittance Advice Candidate ISO (in development) Bank Services Billing Bank Services Billing Debtor Creditor ISO_20022_SV_v100

10 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (2/11) Payments message portfolio is growing!
64 ISO messages approved: Customer payment initiation Interbank payment clearing and settlement Payments exceptions & investigations Bank-to-customer cash management Mandates Change/verify account identification Bank account management Creditor payment activation request Cash account reporting request & notification messages Bank services billing Authorities financial investigations Stand-alone remittance advice messages Candidate ISO messages under evaluation None Candidate ISO messages approved for development: Cash management Account switching Mandate Status List Financial Institution Direct Debit Cross Border Transaction Currency Control Reporting (CTCCR) Payment Pre-Authorization (PaPA) New development proposals:

11 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (3/11) Card message portfolio is growing
Authorisation (ATICA) Acquirer Issuer In October 2010, the Cards and Related Retail Financial Services SEG approved a first set of 15 Card Payments Exchange (CAPE) messages developed by nexo A.I.S.B.L (formerly EPASOrg) to support Acceptor to Acquirer POI activities, including authorisation, completion, batch transfer, cancellation, reconciliation, diagnostic and rejection. In April 2011, the SEG approved an additional three messages developed by nexo A.I.S.B.L to cover POI Terminal Management, including status report, management plan and acceptor parameters. In January 2013, it approved a fourth Terminal Management message submitted by nexo A.I.S.B.L . In January 2014, the Cards and Related Retail Financial Services SEG approved two new Card Payments Exchange (CAPE) messages developed by nexo A.I.S.B.L . In January 2015, the SEG approved an additional two Terminal Management messages developed by nexo A.I.S.B.L. In August 2015, the SEG approved 21 ATM interface for transaction processing and ATM management messages developed jointly by the IFX Forum and nexo A.I.S.B.L.. nexo A.I.S.B.L will develop additional candidate messages to cover the Sale Management at the retailer (Sale to POI). The SEG is currently evaluating candidate Acquirer to issuer card messages (ATICA) developed by ISO TC68/SC7/TG1 as a reverse engineering of ISO 8583 card messages in ISO Two other business justifications were approved by the RMG: - Dispute resolution in cards fee collection proposed by China UnionPay. - Payment Tokens Management Exchanges (a.k.a. TOKE) by nexo A.I.S.B.L. ATMI transaction authorisation POI transaction authorisation (CAPE) POI Terminal Management (CAPE) ATM terminal Management ISO 20022 Candidate ISO (in development) Acceptor Sale Management (CAPE) ISO_20022_SV_v100

12 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (4/11) Cards and related retail financial services
44 ISO messages approved: Card payments exchanges (CAPE) – Acceptor to Acquirer and Terminal Management ATM interface for transaction processing and ATM management 13 candidate ISO messages under evaluation Acquirer to issuer card messages (ATICA) Candidate ISO messages approved for development: Card Payments Exchanges (CAPE) - Sale-to-POI management Dispute Resolution in Cards Fee Collection Payment Tokens Management Exchanges (TOKE) ISO_20022_SV_v100

13 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (5/11) Securities - equities and fixed income
Buyer Seller Pre-trade / Trade (FIX/SWIFT) Post-Trade (Omgeo/SWIFT) CCP Clearing (FPL/SWIFT) Regulators Transaction Regulatory Reporting (SWIFT) Corporate Actions (SWIFT) Settlement (SWIFT) Settlement (SWIFT) Corporate Actions (SWIFT) On the traditional fixed income and equities markets, the securities industry is using ISO 15022, the precursor of ISO ISO (illustrated in red/orange on the slide) covers a large part of the securities business from trade to settlement and reconciliation, and corporate actions. ISO developments initially focused on areas not (well) covered by ISO such as: the pre-trade and trade space (29 candidate messages submitted by FIX and SWIFT) the transaction regulatory reporting required to address MiFID (four messages developed by SWIFT) the proxy voting process (eight messages developed by SWIFT) the issuer’s agent communication for corporate actions (22 messages developed by Euroclear) the investment funds distribution (see next slide). However, under the pressure of the firms who have not invested in ISO and would prefer to invest directly in ISO 20022 the industry initiatives (Giovannini, MiFID, T2S) recommending ISO 20022 the other financial industry sectors which are moving to ISO (eg, payments/SEPA), the RMG approved the development of ISO equivalent messages in the ‘core’ areas of settlement and reconciliation (29 messages approved in December 2009) and corporate actions (13 messages approved in December 2009), which are covered by ISO An initial set of 5 Post-trade matching messages developed by SWIFT and Omgeo was approved by the SEG on 3 August 2011. On 7 October 2011, the SEG approved a Total Portfolio Valuation Statement report submitted by SWIFT on behalf of ISITC and 4 additional Settlement and Reconciliation messages developed by SWIFT, including an Audit Trail to be used by T2S. On 22 January 2015, the SEG approved 10 CCP Clearing messages submitted by SWIFT and FPL as well as 14 Collateral Management messages submitted by SWIFT, FPL, FpML and ISITC. SWIFT, Omgeo, FPL, FpML, ISITC , ECB and the 4CB have also started development of candidate ISO messages in a series of specific areas. NB: the slide doesn’t show all the approved business justifications. ISO 20022 Reconciliation TPV Statement (ISITC/SWIFT) Candidate ISO (in development) Reconciliation (SWIFT) ISO 15022 I/CSD Settlement & Reconciliation (SWIFT) Settlement & Reconciliation (SWIFT) Custodian Issuers’ Agent Communication (Euroclear) Clearing agent Corporate Actions (SWIFT) Issuers’ Agent ISO_20022_SV_v100

14 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (6/11) Securities - investment funds (CIV)
PEP/ISA/Portfolio Transfers Old plan manager Fund accountant New plan manager Price Report Order & Confirmation & Status Alternative Funds Order, Confirm & Status A full set of 68 ISO messages was developed by SWIFT in the area of Collective Investment Vehicle (CIV). 45 of them were approved in December A second release, including 22 additional messages, was approved in April Two Fund Processing Passport Report messages from SWIFT were approved in November 2009. SWIFT has developed 8 candidate messages for Alternative Funds (hedge funds) that are piloted before registration. Clearstream is developing two candidate messages to offer a ‘Transparency of Holdings’ statement mechanism primarily intended for holdings of shares in investment funds. Transfer & Confirmation & Status Transfer agent Transparency of Holdings Institutional investor Statements Account Management Fund Cash Forecast Report Request for Fund Report Prospectus or FPP report user, e.g. Fund distributor FPP Report Investment manager Prospectus or FPP report provider, e.g. Fund manager ISO 20022 Candidate ISO (in development) ISO_20022_SV_v100

15 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (7/11) Securities message portfolio is growing!
178 ISO messages approved and published: Investment funds distribution Securities transaction regulatory reporting Proxy voting Issuers’ agents communication Fund processing passport report Securities settlement and reconciliation Securities corporate actions Securities post-trade Total portfolio valuation report CCP Clearing Collateral management 5 Candidate ISO messages under evaluation: Money Market Statistical Reporting (MMSR) Candidate ISO messages approved for development: Alternative funds TARGET2-Securities SSI for Securities, Payments & FX Transparency of holdings S&R and CA - ISO variants New development proposals: Market Claims

16 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (8/11) Forex
Trading system ISO 20022 Candidate ISO 20022 (in development) Ordering party MTs FpML CUG (Trade Notifications) FX order Interest rate swaps Trade capture Trading party In March 2007, the FX SEG approved 15 Forex Notifications messages submitted by CLS. In September 2015, the SEG approved a set of 13 ‘Post Trade Foreign Exchange’ message definitions developed by CLS. This message set was complemented with two message definitions from the Forex Notifications message set, the rest of the latter message set was archived. The SWIFT MT and FpML messages shown on the slide are for information only. In April 2014, the RMG approved two Business Justifications submitted by China Foreign Exchange Trade System (CFETS) for the development of ISO FX Post-Trade Trade Confirmation and FX Post-Trade Trade Capture candidate messages. Foreign exchange instruments Loans and deposits Trading party FX & Loan/Deposit Advice & Allocations Deriv-atives FX Spot, Forward & Swap instructions NDF and FX Option instructions (archived) Settlement party custodian Status notifications and payment information Status notifications and payment information Central Settlement System ISO_20022_SV_v100

17 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (9/11) FX message portfolio is growing!
15 ISO messages approved and published: Post Trade FX messages Candidate ISO messages under evaluation: None Candidate ISO messages approved for development: FX Post-Trade Confirmation FX Post-Trade Trade Capture New development proposals ISO_20022_SV_v100

18 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (10/11) Trade Services
Buyer’s bank Seller’s bank Financial Invoice Trade Services Management Trade Services Management TSU Invoice Tax Report The Trade Services SEG approved: 3 Invoice Financing Request messages submitted by the CBI Consortium in October 2007, 50 Trade Services Management (TSU) messages submitted by SWIFT in April 2008. a Financial Invoice message developed by UN/CEFACT in October 2010 20 messages developed by SWIFT to support Demand Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit (this is not represented on the slide) in December 2012 11 Factoring Services messages developed by the Association Française des Sociétés Financières (ASF) in March 2015. In October 2012, the RMG approved a business justification from the Federation of Finnish Financial Services (FFI) and Tieto for the development of a message to support the provision of Invoice Tax Report to Tax Authorities. ISO 20022 Financial Invoice Candidate ISO 20022 (in development) Factoring Services Invoice Financing Request Factoring Services Financial Invoice Tax Authority Invoice Tax Report Financial Invoice Buyer Seller ISO_20022_SV_v100

19 The ISO 20022 recipe is used! (11/11) Trade message portfolio is growing!
85 ISO messages approved: Invoice financing request Trade services management Financial invoice Demand guarantees and standby letters of credit Factoring services Candidate ISO messages under evaluation: None Candidate ISO messages approved for development: Invoice Tax Report New development proposals: ISO_20022_SV_v100

20 Who is interested by ISO 20022?
From 23 March 2014 to 23 March 2015, had 427,671 visits from 260,928 visitors from 200 countries Country/Territory Sessions % 1 United States 52,912 12% 2 United Kingdom 38,859 9% 3 France 34,461 8% 4 Germany 28,058 7% 5 India 27,981 6 Switzerland 18,681 4% 7 Spain 18,033 8 Italy 15,414 9 Belgium 13,467 3% 10 Sweden 12,714 11 Netherlands 12,631 12 Australia 9,619 2% 13 Japan 8,112 14 Singapore 8,088 15 Canada 7,269 16 Finland 17 Russia 7,138 18 Poland 5,444 1% 19 Norway 5,148 20 Brazil 5,046 21 China 4,775 22 Denmark 4,463 23 Austria 4,321 24 Hong Kong 4,199 25 Portugal 3,406 26 South Africa 3,361 27 Ireland 3,360 85% - The continents are sorted on the number of visits to the ISO website. - The countries listed in the table (right) are those representing 85 % of the ISO website visits. 23 Mar 14 – 23 Mar 15 Continent Number of visits % Europe 261,330 61.4% Asia 74,730 17.5% Americas 71,013 16.7% Oceania 10,751 2.5% Africa 8,118 1.9% ISO_20022_SV_v100

21 & Answers uestions www.iso20022.org iso20022ra@iso20022.org
We have reached the end of this presentation. Remember, a lot of information is available on the ISO website ( which is updated on an ongoing basis, but questions and comments can also be sent to the RA: Answers ISO_20022_SV_v100


Download ppt "ISO The success of ISO – Universal financial Industry"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google