1. Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated. See the OER Public Archive Home Page for more details about archived files.archivedOER Public Archive Home Page

2. VIDEO ENHANCED DISCUSSION (VED) December 4, 2006 Eileen W. Bradley, D.Sc. Chief, Surgical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services

3. Why VED Now? Mission Critical to Have OptionsMission Critical to Have Options Difficulty Recruiting Reviewers, Especially CliniciansDifficulty Recruiting Reviewers, Especially Clinicians Software And Collaborations in Place--- breezeSoftware And Collaborations in Place--- breeze Additional Resources To Facilitate The ProcessAdditional Resources To Facilitate The Process

4. THOSE WHO MAKE IT WORK REVIEW TSB CIT

5. REVIEW XIANG-NING LI, M.D., Ph.D.XIANG-NING LI, M.D., Ph.D. GUO FENG XU, Ph.D.GUO FENG XU, Ph.D. WEIHUA LUO, M.D., Ph.D.WEIHUA LUO, M.D., Ph.D. KAHLID MASOOD, Ph.D.KAHLID MASOOD, Ph.D. PUSHPA TANDON, Ph.D.PUSHPA TANDON, Ph.D. LEE ROSEN, Ph.D.LEE ROSEN, Ph.D. EILEEN W. BRADLEY, D.Sc.EILEEN W. BRADLEY, D.Sc. TSBCIT RICH MCKAYJOHN RISTONRICH MCKAYJOHN RISTON GENE DIGGSGENE DIGGS MELVIN OLIVOMELVIN OLIVO SAUNAK DESAISAUNAK DESAI ABDI AMALOABDI AMALO MICHAEL LEWISMICHAEL LEWIS LARRY SPILLERSLARRY SPILLERS

6. What do you need? PC with internet connection – LAN speedPC with internet connection – LAN speed A webcam (built-in Microphone)A webcam (built-in Microphone) Computer speakersComputer speakers Software: BreezeSoftware: Breeze Backup: TelephoneBackup: Telephone

7. FIRST YEAR EXPERIENCES SBIB PROCURING PHONES FOR REVIEWERS TIME INTENSIVE TRAINING OF REVIEWERS BY SRA DIFFICULTIES WITH VOICE

8. ADVANTAGES RECRUIT ‘HARD TO GET’ REVIEWERS e.g. clinicians SAVING REVIEWERS’ TIME— INTERACTIVE CONVENIENT SITE e.g. office / home PRICELESS!!!!!

10. VED PILOT--------WHAT WORKS RECRUITMENT OF REVIEWERSRECRUITMENT OF REVIEWERS REVIEW OF 20-40 PROPOSALS REVIEW OF 20-40 PROPOSALS INCLUSION OF 30 PARTICIPANTS— REVIEWERS/PROGRAM STAFF INCLUSION OF 30 PARTICIPANTS— REVIEWERS/PROGRAM STAFF TIME LIMIT IN THE RANGE OF FOUR HOURSTIME LIMIT IN THE RANGE OF FOUR HOURS

11. RAMPING UP…. JANUARY 2007 COUNCIL—6 REVIEWS IN SBIBJANUARY 2007 COUNCIL—6 REVIEWS IN SBIB MAY 2007 COUNCIL--- AT LEAST 6 ADDITIONAL 12 REVIEWS ACROSS CSRMAY 2007 COUNCIL--- AT LEAST 6 ADDITIONAL 12 REVIEWS ACROSS CSR OCTOBER 2007 COUNCIL---ADD 6OCTOBER 2007 COUNCIL---ADD 6 18 REVIEWS ACROSS CSR 18 REVIEWS ACROSS CSR MOST LIKELY MORE EACH ROUND--- INCREASED TECH SUPPORTMOST LIKELY MORE EACH ROUND--- INCREASED TECH SUPPORT

12. CSR’S GOAL…… SRAs COMFORTABLE WITH VED IN THEIR TOOLBOX And maybe to do all reviews of 20 applications or less by an alternate format