Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015

2 2 Agenda 1.Overview of the Subgrantee Monitoring Topical Call Series 2.Effective Monitoring 3.Sample Subgrantee Monitoring Tools 4.Activity 5.Resources

3 3 Series Overview  Develop familiarity with subgrantee monitoring tools  Practice administering the tools using fictional data, scenarios and videos of classroom practice  Practice analyzing the data collected by the tools  Discuss how to adapt the tool to local contexts

4 4 Series Overview: Call 1  Meeting Civil Rights Obligations (Activity: Program Performance Data)  Teacher equity  College and career readiness  School discipline

5 5 Series Overview: Call 2  Special populations (Activity: Documentation (instructional artifacts) and Focus Group Data)  Cultural and linguistic competence (e.g., racial and ethnic minorities, limited English proficient students)  Students with disabilities  Gender-specific programming  Youth of transition age

6 6 Series Overview: Call 3  Conditions for Learning (Activity: Observation Data)  Safety  Support  Social and Emotional Learning  Engagement and Challenge

7 7 Effective Monitoring  Ensures accountability and compliance with applicable State and Federal laws and improve outcomes  Offers support and technical assistance to programs and facilities  Supports improved outcomes for youth who are system- involved  ED typically monitors SEAs every 3 to 5 years  SEAs are encouraged to monitor subgrantees at least once every 3 years  Monitoring visits are often scheduled in advance; Unannounced visits are not prohibited and generally occur in reaction to issues raised during onsite or desk audits

8 8 Poll: How frequently do you monitor your subgrantees (desk and/or on-site)?  Annually  Every two years  Every three years  Every four to five years  Rarely/Never

9 9 Poll: How often do you conduct site visits?  Annually  Every two years  Every three years  Every four to five years  Rarely/Never

10 10 Poll: In a given year, do you typically monitor:  All of your subgrantees?  Some of your subgrantees?

11 11 Effective Monitoring: Language of Cooperation  Tell me about…  Help me understand how…  What are your greatest challenges?  What are you most proud of?  How can I help? What support such as training and technical assistance can I offer?  What questions do you have?  Here’s what I learned. Did I get it right?  Are there questions I should have asked but didn’t?

12 12 Sample Subgrantee Monitoring Tools  Minimally address compliance with statute  Vary across states in:  Rigor  Content  Data sources  Depth

13 13 Poll: Which data sources do you use when monitoring?  Interviews  Focus groups  Surveys  Observations  Documentation  Program Performance Data (e.g., course passage rates, grades, attendance, pre-post test scores)  Other

14 14 Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students: The Tool  Modular (pick and choose dimensions that suit you)  Formative, staff-centered instrument  Quantitative and qualitative measures  Dimensions  Teacher equity  College and career readiness  School Discipline

15 15 Using the Tool  Collect performance data  Collect supporting evidence  What questions arise from the performance data?  What data sources can help you answer those questions?

16 16 Using the Tool  Jointly analyze quantitative and qualitative data  How has the subgrantee/facility performed over time? Any significant changes?  How does the subgrantee/facility compare to national averages?  How does the subgrantee/facility compare to its peers in the State?  Jointly rate the subgrantee/facility and discuss next steps

17 17 QUESTIONS?

18 18 Resources  Tip Sheet: Tip Sheet: Subgrantee MonitoringTip Sheet: Subgrantee Monitoring  2012 NDTAC Conference Presentation: Monitoring & Evaluation: Best Practices (Dr. Peter Leone)Monitoring & Evaluation: Best Practices  Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education  Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC)  CRDC Data Snapshot: Teacher Equity CRDC Data Snapshot: Teacher Equity  CRDC Data Snapshot: College and Career Readiness CRDC Data Snapshot: College and Career Readiness  CRDC Data Snapshot: School Discipline CRDC Data Snapshot: School Discipline

19 19 Resources  Great Teachers & Leaders Great Teachers & Leaders  Guide to Evaluation Products Guide to Evaluation Products  Online Database of State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems Online Database of State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems


Download ppt "ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google