1. President Obama was born in which U.S. state 1.Illinois 2.Texas 3.New York 4.Hawaii 5.Trick Question: Washington DC 6.Kenya

2. Hawaii (4) is right He was Senator for Illinois George W Bush was Texas His father was from Kenya, but had he been born there he would probably not have been eligible (article 2.1.5 of U.S. constitution) DC is indeed not a state, but counts as U.S. for the purpose

3. That was the warmup Now to check clickers against groups IF your group name is shown, please press the associated number on each individual clicker AND the group clicker ELSE wait for next slide(s)

4. Please select a Team: If youre not here, wait. 1.Team A 2.Team B 3.Team C 4.Team D 5.Team E

5. Please select a Team: If youre not here, wait. 1.Team F 2.Team G 3.Team H 4.Team I 5.Team J

6. Please select a Team If youre not here, you should have been done already 1.Team K 2.Team L 3.Team M 4.Team N

7. Now for your questions Im going to show the individual slide please answer as individuals. Then Ill ask you to start conferring. Part way through this, Ill show the individual answers. Then Ill put up the group slide, and ask groups to vote using the group clickers only A group should vote on its own question

8. I: Which of the following scenarios would benefit most from disabling TCP slow start? 1.Many TCP connections between two nodes on the same physical LAN with one node connected via a physical link consisting of a wireless ethernet card. 2.Many TCP connections between two nodes connected over a WAN. Again one node is connected via a physical link consisting of a wireless ethernet card. 3.Many TCP connections between two nodes on the same physical LAN 4.Using VOIP over a LAN. 5.When transferring a large file over the internet.

9. G :Which of the following scenarios would benefit most from disabling TCP slow start? 1.Many TCP connections between two nodes on the same physical LAN with one node connected via a physical link consisting of a wireless ethernet card. 2.Many TCP connections between two nodes connected over a WAN. Again one node is connected via a physical link consisting of a wireless ethernet card. 3.Many TCP connections between two nodes on the same physical LAN 4.Using VOIP over a LAN. 5.When transferring a large file over the internet.

10. Justification of answers We think *answer 1* is the scenario that would benefit *most *from having TCP slow start *disabled*. Therefore answer 1 is the "correct" answer. For 1,2,3 - The fact that 'many' TCP connections are made makes little difference. Any overhead (CPU/memory) required for many slow start algorithms running simultaneously is negligible. Slow start is about protecting networks

11. I: With regard to Silly Window Syndrome (SWS), Nagles Algorithm: 1.Solves the problem of SWS. 2.Only solves certain cases of SWS. 3.Solves SWS when a receiving TCP is serving an application that consumes data too slowly. 4.Is appropriate when Clarks solution or Delayed Ack wont work

12. G: With regard to Silly Window Syndrome (SWS), Nagles Algorithm: 1.Solves the problem of SWS. 2.Only solves certain cases of SWS. 3.Solves SWS when a receiving TCP is serving an application that consumes data too slowly. 4.Is appropriate when Clarks solution or Delayed A wont work.

13. Answers The answer : 2! 1.False: It only solves half the problem; it solves it on the sender side, by preventing the sender from sending tinygrams, but it doesnt stop the receiver from advertising tiny windows. 2.True: It doesnt solve the problem of the application on the receiving side reading data too slowly. 3.False: Clarks solution and delayed acknowledgements deal with this side of the problem. 4.True, but a worse answer than 2: Clarks solution and Delayed Acknowledgements are actually solving the other half of the problem, and both techniques are required to prevent SWS from occuring.

14. I: Which of these is the most important factor in the reliability of a secondary DNS server? 1.Being located in a different country to the primary 2.The primary server is polled for changes frequently 3.Running on the same hardware as the primary machine 4.Being connected to the net via different routes to the primary and other secondary servers

15. G: Which of these is the most important factor in the reliability of a secondary DNS server? 1.Being located in a different country to the primary 2.The primary server is polled for changes frequently 3.Running on the same hardware as the primary machine 4.Being connected to the net via different routes to the primary and other secondary servers

16. Answer 1.Correct; RFC 2182 describes best current practice as having at least one secondary server on a different international backbone to the primary server. 2.Correct; Polling frequently (normally around every 3 hours) ensures data is accurate and up to date. 3.Wrong 4.Correct; This is (arguably) the best answer, and can be implied by 1, but may not be. Two countries can use the same pipe to the rest of the world, having a primary in one and a secondary in the other wouldnt be ideal.

17. Protocol-Independent Multicast: How to do multicast routing PIM is actually a variety of protocols, PIM Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) explicitly builds unidirectional shared trees rooted at a rendezvous point (RP) per group, and optionally creates shortest-path trees per source. PIM-SM generally scales fairly well for wide- area usage. See the PIM Internet Standard RFC 4601PIM Sparse ModeRFC 4601 PIM Dense Mode (PIM-DM) uses dense multicast routing. It implicitly builds shortest-path trees by flooding multicast traffic domain wide, and then pruning back branches of the tree where no receivers are present. PIM-DM generally has poor scaling properties.[1]dense multicastmulticast[1] Bidirectional PIM explicitly builds shared bi-directional trees. It never builds a shortest path tree, so may have longer end-to-end delays than PIM-SM, but scales well because it needs no source-specific state. See Bidirectional PIM Internet Standard RFC 5015RFC 5015 PIM source-specific multicast (PIM-SSM) builds trees that are rooted in just one source, offering a more secure and scalable model for a limited amount of applications (mostly broadcasting of content).source-specific multicast

18. I: In what way is Internet Group Management Protocol inefficient? 1.IGMP has no guarantee that a report is delivered 2.IGMP is not a transport protocol, but instead instantiates PIM connections 3.Multicast use in WANs causes lots of problems 4.It is in fact efficient

19. G: In what way is Internet Group Management Protocol inefficient? 1.IGMP has no guarantee that a report is delivered 2.IGMP is not a transport protocol, but instead instantiates PIM connections 3.Multicast use in WANs causes lots of problems 4.It is in fact efficient

20. Answer Slide All answers are true to an extent, but (3) is best. 1) Although can be a problem, is generally solved due to answer 4). 2) It creates a group before it implements Protocol Independent Multicast. It would be more efficient to use this all the time. 3) Not fully solved so problems may arise when used. 4) Has efficiency methods For 1) IGMP sends membership query messages repeatedly until an acknowledgment is received. Also has scheduling so not to send the same report twice.

21. DNS server records (SRV) MX records are specific to SMTP, and assume you know to use TCP port 25 You (or your browser) have to guess to stick www on the front of a web address, and use TCP port 80 Instead, why not look up a generic service record, e.g. _ smtp._tcp.bath.ac.uk

22. I: MX Records serve a similar purpose for SMTP as SRV Records serve for other protocols. Which of the following statements do you most agree with? 1.It is necessary to have both MX and SRV Records 2.MX Records should be phased out and replaced by the more generic SRV Records 3.MX Records should remain because it would be too difficult to replace as their use in email is so entrenched them 4.SMTP itself is a flawed protocol and should be replaced altogether

23. G: MX Records serve a similar purpose for SMTP as SRV Records serve for other protocols. Which of the following statements do you most agree with? 1.It is necessary to have both MX and SRV Records 2.MX Records should be phased out and replaced by the more generic SRV Records 3.MX Records should remain because it would be too difficult to replace them their use in email is so entrenched 4.SMTP itself is a flawed protocol and should be replaced altogether

24. Answers 1.False. The data stored in SRV Records is a superset of the data in MX Records*, thus it is possible for SRV Records to serve the same purpose. 2. Arguably True. For the same reasons as 3, its debatable whether the impact on old software would cause a major problem. Otherwise, as mentioned, SMTP would be trivial to change. 3.Arguably True. It would be trivial to change the SMTP protocol to use SRV Records, but old software would still be looking for MX Records. 4.Debatable. This answer is meant to be thought provoking. Why is SMTP one of the few protocols that requires its own record? * SRV has Priority, Weight, Port and Target. MX has Priority and Target

25. Networking A few questions on the course A few questions about the course, and this teaching methodology

26. I: Good fun, something different and its very good to be interactive since we do not get much class participation, except if we want to ask questions 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree

27. I: Although good for general feed- back how we are doing, its not so good for passing course material on. 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree

28. I: Compared with individually answering, group answering is 1.Much more educational 2.Somewhat more educational 3.Neutral 4.Rather less educational 5.Much less educational

29. I: My involvement in designing a question has improved my understanding of networking 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree

30. I: Working in groups to design these questions was 1.Very beneficial 2.Beneficial 3.Neutral 4.A sad necessity 5.Disastrous

31. I: Working in groups to answer other groups questions was 1.Very beneficial 2.Beneficial 3.Neutral 4.A sad necessity 5.Disastrous