Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

THE REVIEW MATRIX EVIDENTIAL STRANDS Submissions Soundings Surveys Searches PERSPECTIVES: Children Society Education THEMES: Purposes & values Learning.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "THE REVIEW MATRIX EVIDENTIAL STRANDS Submissions Soundings Surveys Searches PERSPECTIVES: Children Society Education THEMES: Purposes & values Learning."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 THE REVIEW MATRIX EVIDENTIAL STRANDS Submissions Soundings Surveys Searches PERSPECTIVES: Children Society Education THEMES: Purposes & values Learning & teaching Curriculum & assessment Quality & standards Diversity & inclusion Settings & professionals Parenting, caring & educating Beyond the school Structures & phases Funding & governance

3 EVIDENCE: QUANTITY Formal written submissions received1052 (between 1 & 300 pages each) Collective consultations to date & scheduled274 (between 1 hr & 2 days each) Regional community soundings87 sessions in 9 regional locations National soundings9 full-day seminars in London & Cambridge Other consultations 180 to date and scheduled Commissioned surveys of published research28 Published sources cited in the research surveys3000+ Further published sources cited in final report1000+

4 INTERIM REPORTS October 2007 Community Soundings (1) November 2007 – May 2008 How well are we doing? Standards, quality and assessment (3) Childrens lives and voices: home and school (4) Childrens development, learning and needs (4) Aims and values (4) Structures and curriculum (3) Governance, funding, reform & quality assurance (4) Teachers: training, development, leadership, workforce reform (3) Learning and teaching (3) February 2009 Towards a new primary curriculum (2)

5 PRIMARY ITT – SOME ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION THE BEST-TRAINED TEACHERS EVER? Politics and evidence. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ways of conforming vs ways of thinking. TDA standards vs models from research. (More) THE CURRICULUM: expertise, PCK, the classteacher system, roles and routes. (More) PEDAGOGY: recipe vs repertoire; prescription vs principle. ROUTES: the future of the BEd; the viability of a one-year PGCE THE TEACHER EDUCATORS: what expertise does the job really require? Is there is signature pedagogy for ITE? (Shulman / Furlong) UDEs: RESEARCH AND QUALITY (Smithers and Robinson).

6 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: POLICY vs RESEARCH THE TDA STANDARDS: QTS (Q) – Core (C) - Post-threshold (P) – Excellent (E) – Advanced Skills (A) What is the difference? Where do they come from? How have they been validated? How useful/objective are they? GLASER. Development as change in agency over time: externally supported – transitional – self-regulatory. DREYFUS AND DREYFUS. : novice – advanced beginner – competent – proficient – expert. From rules via precedent case and strategic knowledge to intuition, fluidity and idiosyncrasy. Experts engage in performance in a qualitatively different way than do novice or competent performers. (Berliner) NBPTS standards as validated by reference to research and learning outcomes: The features with the greatest ability to discriminate between the expert/non-expert teachers were the degree of challenge the curriculum offered, the teachers ability for deep representations of subject-matter, and the teachers skilfulness in monitoring and providing feedback to students. (Berliner). Deep representations of subject matter, the class teacher and ITT… Expert teachers: advanced skills or constrained skills?

7 THE CURRICULUM PROBLEM ACCORDING TO ROSE How can we help primary class teachers solve the quarts-into- pint-pots problem of teaching 13 subjects, plus religious education, to sufficient depth, in the time available

8 THE CURRICULUM: THE REAL PROBLEMS WHAT IS PRIMARY EDUCATION FOR? The absence of debate about the aims of primary education. Stated aims as cosmetic; real aims as before. MANAGEABILITY vs EXPERTISE: is the problem the curriculum, or the available resources and expertise for teaching it? Why does Rose presume this is a problem only for class teachers? The wrong tree? ONE CURRICULUM OR TWO? The : the 3Rs and the divided curriculum THE CHARADE OF REFORM and 1998: re-labelling & adjustment at the margins rather than reform. Since then - the erosion of childrens statutory entitlement to breadth and balance the untenable opposition of breadth and standards standards in literacy and numeracy as proxies for the quality of the whole. STANDARDS NOT CURRICULUM. The distorting impact of the standards agenda (PNS + SATs) TRANSITION AND CONTINUITY, especially EYFS-KS1. A MUDDLED AND POLARISED DISCOURSE. Subjects, knowledge, skills and themes. PRESCRIPTION, COMPLIANCE, DEPENDENCE and the loss of autonomous professional discussion.

9 A NEW PRIMARY CURRICULUM: ELEMENTS The Community Curriculum 30% of teaching time Overall framework and Programmes of study Locally proposed NON-STATUTORY Domains Arts and creativity Citizenship and ethics Faith and belief Language, oracy and literacy Mathematics Physical and emotional health Place and time Science and technology Aims Wellbeing Engagement Empowerment Autonomy Encouraging respect and reciprocity Promoting interdependence and sustainability Empowering local, national and global citizenship Celebrating culture and community Exploring, knowing, understanding and making sense Fostering skills Exciting the imagination Enacting dialogue A New Primary Curriculum The National Curriculum 70% of teaching time Overall framework Nationally determined STATUTORY Programmes of study Nationally proposed NON-STATUTORY

10 CONDITIONS FOR SUCCESS Genuine reform: not mere re-labelling of existing national curriculum Redefine standards: entitlement to excellence in all domains, not just in what is tested Redefine / rebalance roles: DCSF, QCA, National Strategies, local authorities & schools Re-invigorate local innovation and ownership through community partnerships and capacity-building Re-think national strategies: re-integrate literacy and numeracy with English and mathematics Make what is non-statutory genuinely so: end ambiguity of non-statutory but obligatory Reform national assessment Re-think teaching roles & staff deployment for new approach to entitlement /standards Encourage school and professional partnership and networking Reform ITT and CPD with new roles and enhanced expertise in view Lift level of curriculum debate, especially in relation to subjects, knowledge and skills

11 PRIMARY ITT – SOME ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION THE BEST-TRAINED TEACHERS EVER? Politics and evidence. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ways of conforming vs ways of thinking. TDA standards vs models from research. THE CURRICULUM: expertise, PCK, the classteacher system, roles and routes. PEDAGOGY: recipe vs repertoire; prescription vs principle. ROUTES: the future of the BEd; the viability of a one-year PGCE THE TEACHER EDUCATORS: what expertise does the job really require? Is there is signature pedagogy for ITE? (Shulman / Furlong) UDEs: RESEARCH AND QUALITY (Smithers and Robinson).

12


Download ppt "THE REVIEW MATRIX EVIDENTIAL STRANDS Submissions Soundings Surveys Searches PERSPECTIVES: Children Society Education THEMES: Purposes & values Learning."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google