1. Mutual Legal Assistance Kennedy Talbot 33 Chancery Lane kt@33cllaw.com

2. SOCA v Perry Perry convicted of serious fraud in Israel Perry in Israel; £12m in London bank accounts Disclosure order made and notice sent to Perry’s London house Perry challenge to jurisdiction of SOCA officer to issue notice

3. Court of Appeal (Civil Division) England Richards LJ – no jurisdiction – target of notice must be in UK at time of issue or thereafter Carnwath LJ – some limits to jurisdiction – house in London, acknowledged by solicitors - enough Ward LJ….. Joint investigations Don’t have to finish criminal investigation Fact that CR might mean not in PI to prosecute Compromises but no buying off prosecution No criminal and civil at the same time.Comment? Prosecutors as claimants - a new approach to prosecuting decisions? S.2A of the 2002 Act and A-G’s guidance Consequences – re-litigation and disclosure

4. “The purpose of the Act is to combat cross-border unlawful conduct and I cannot accept that the legislature intended that [the authorities] should engage in this battle against international criminal activity with one hand tied behind its back. If [an officer] knows where the account holder is, why cannot the appropriate officer visit him abroad and ask him a few direct questions?”

5. More Formal Arrangements – History Territorial Comity Public matters Civil Foreign Tribunals Evidence Act 1856 Treaties – 1959 European Convention – 1988 Vienna Convention – 1990 Strasbourg Convention

6. Current Crime (International Cooperation) Act 1990 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2003

7. General Principles Reciprocity Specialty (Gooch; BOC v Barlow) Costs and asset sharing Confidentiality (Evans v SFO) Requesting parties Discretion and refusal to assist

8. Types of Assistance Examination of witnesses and production of documents – evidence - compulsion and exceptions Searches Confidential material / banking documents CIO / AMO SFO s.2

9. Practical Considerations Participation at examinations Challenges to procedures – admissibility – JR – Abuse (Zardari) LPP and self - incrimination

10. Restraint and Confiscation Investigation Extent of restraint – location of assets (King) Legal expenses Investigation of merits and human rights (Al Zahat / Montgomery (no 2)) Disclosure (Stanford)

11. Confiscation Registration and enforcement Procedural defences Rights of innocent third parties (Art. 46) and victims (Re D, 19 th March 2010, HC)

12. SOCA v Perry [2010] Civ 907 Gooch [1991] 1 Cr App R(S) 183 BOC v Barlow [2001] EWCA Civ 854 Govt of USA v Montgomery (no 2) [2004] 1 WLR 2241 Finnivest [1997] 1 WLR 743 Zardari (29 th April 1998) DC King v SFO [2009] 1 WLR 718 Al Zahat [2008] Lloyds Rep 390 Stanford v SFO [2010] EWCA Civ 137 Re D [2010] March 19 th Evans v SFO [2003] 1 WLR 299