Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Sociolinguistics 5 Power and solidarity. 2 The story so far We classify ourselves and others. How we classify someone determines what rights we think.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 Sociolinguistics 5 Power and solidarity. 2 The story so far We classify ourselves and others. How we classify someone determines what rights we think."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Sociolinguistics 5 Power and solidarity

2 2 The story so far We classify ourselves and others. How we classify someone determines what rights we think they have. –Positive rights to respect –Negative rights to freedom The way we present ourselves in public is ourface, which defines our rights. We can threaten other peoples faces. If we do, we can compensate by politeness.

3 3 Negative politeness expressions Apology: sorry (It was an accident.) –Apology-acceptance: thats ok (Not important) Request: please (Its up to you.) –Request-acceptance: yes (Im willing.) Offer: (there you go), bitte (German) (Im doing this for you.) Gratitude (offer-acceptance): thanks (You didnt have to do it.) –Gratitude-acceptance: not at all (Not important)

4 4 The meaning of Sorry!

5 5 Discrimination Politeness is for saving other peoples faces. But in fact we dont give everyone the same rights. At least small children have limited freedom. Slaves (if we have them!) have no rights at all. Nor does the enemy.

6 6 Discrimination (1)

7 7 Classification matters How we treat others depends on how we classify them. We distinguish the rights of sub-groups of our own group. But our classification may exclude some people altogether from having rights. And what about animal rights?

8 8 Discrimination (2)

9 9 A cautionary tale Then Gilead cut Ephraim off from the fords of the Jordan, and whenever an Ephraimite fugitive said let me cross, the men of Gilead asked him to say shibboleth [ear of corn]. If he said sibboleth, they seized and slaughtered him. (Judges 12, 4-6). Language as a badge of membership. Classification decides rights.

10 10 How to classify other people You can classify them. –E.g. as child Or you can classify your relation to them. –E.g. as subordinate These classifications are separate: –A child isnt subordinate to everyone – e.g. not to other children. –A subordinate neednt be a child.

11 11 Linguistic signals We can use two kinds of linguistic signals to show how we classify others and our relations to them. Politeness markers – used when we threaten their face. Social signals –used all the time. –E.g. Dick or Professor Hudson?

12 12 Relations among relatives

13 13 Angelas family

14 14 Family names

15 15 A family network

16 16 High power in the family …

17 17 …middle power …

18 18 …and low power.

19 19 Power Power is a relation between two people. It determines the negative rights they expect of each other. There are 3 logical possibilities: –A > B A is superior to B –A < B A is subordinate to B –A = B A is equal to B A and B negotiate their relation –E.g. by signalling linguistically

20 20 Power in a network

21 21 Power in the family Xs Parent > X –Therefore: Xs grandparent > X Sibling of X = X –Therefore: Xs uncle/aunt > X – Etc. Xs older relative > X –Therefore: Xs older sibling > X –Varies with culture X > Xs dog/cat

22 22 A sociolinguistic universal? Xs relatives call X: –By role name, e.g. Dad –By given name, e.g. Dick X calls senior relatives by role name. X calls junior or equal relatives by given name.

23 23 Odd naming practices Some Western families allow given names to senior relatives. Some fathers call their sons son (role name). Chinese use role names for junior siblings (younger brother/sister). Etc.

24 24 Power outside the family Professor > student Boss > employee –E.g. Provost > professor Royal > common? Star > fan Police > public NB Power relations only exist if theyre accepted by both sides!

25 25 Language as a power signal Language can signal power of X in –The word that refers to X, e.g. Xs name –The word that refers to the speaker –A word used when addressing X. Words referring to X: –Names (title, given, family) –Pronouns (e.g. French tu, vous; English thou, you)

26 26 Respect to the referent Words referring to something linked to X: –Honorifics (e.g. Japanese o, honorable) E.g. boosi, hat; o-boosi, hat of a superior A verb of which X is the subject or object (Japanese): –Sensei-ga warat-ta, The teacher laughed. (neutral) –Sensei-ga o-waraini nat-ta. (same, honorific)

27 27 Respect to the addressee Words used in addressing X: The root verb E.g. Japanese He/she/I/they/you came = –Ki-ta (equal) –Ki-mas-ta (respectful) Words referring to the speaker: –Pronouns (e.g. Farsi: man or slave, etc.)

28 28 Given names for subordinates

29 29 Solidarity between chums

30 30 Close friends

31 31 Fellow students?

32 32 Old friends

33 33 Extraordinarily high solidarity

34 34 Low solidarity - an interview

35 35 Minimum solidarity: alone in a crowd

36 36 Solidarity Solidarity is a characteristic of the relation between two people (very abstract!!). It is independent of power. It determines positive rights expected. High solidarity means social closeness, based on: –Social similarity, i.e. shared group allegiance –Amount of contact, i.e. mutual knowledge

37 37 Solidarity in a network

38 38 Solidarity signals: non-verbal

39 39 Solidarity signals: verbal Another universal: –The signals of power are also used for solidarity. –A universal with a few exceptions The linked poles: –Superior = stranger French vous English Professor Hudson –Inferior = intimate French tu English Dick Why? What about the other combinations?

40 40 Coming shortly: Lecture 6 (after reading week): Accommodation and sociolinguistic variables. Lecture 7: Acts of identity.

Download ppt "1 Sociolinguistics 5 Power and solidarity. 2 The story so far We classify ourselves and others. How we classify someone determines what rights we think."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google