Presentation on theme: "BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES OF ADDICTION"— Presentation transcript:
1BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES OF ADDICTION Nick Heather PhD,Centre for Alcohol & Drug Studies,Newcastle, North Tyneside & Northumberland Mental Health NHS Trust,& University of Northumbria
2THE LANGUAGE OF CHOICE“Behavioural economics” – a merging of micro-economic theory and a revolution in behavioural psychology beginning in the 1960s (the “matching law”)“Addiction” is a real phenomenon, not merely a series of causal attributionsAddicts’ choices are predictableAddicts choose to consume drugs etc. but do not choose to be addictedAddicts’ choices are constrained – like all choices
3A DEFINITION OF ADDICTION “(addiction is shown by) a demonstrated failure to refrain from a behaviour despite attempts to do so or a complaint by the person that the behaviour is out of his or her control.”Heather, N. (in press). Comments on O-J. Skog, ‘Addiction: definitions and mechanisms’. In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
4CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR EXPLAINING ADDICTION Other DeterminantsAKRASIA OR “WEAKNESS OF WILL”Other DeterminantsABNORMAL DESIRE FOR DRUG OR ACTIVITY (“CRAVING”)Not SufficientNot SufficientNEUROADAPTION OR PRE-EXISTING DIFFERENCES IN NEURAL RESPONSEFrom: Heather, N. (1998) A conceptual framework for explaining drug addiction, Journal of Psychopharmacology, 12, 3 - 7
5GEORGE AINSLIE’S THEORY Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States Within The Person. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Ainslie, G. (2000). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Anslie, G. & Monterosso, J. (in press). Hyperbolic discounting as a factor in addiction: a critical analysis. In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
6HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNT CURVES BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES ValueTimeHyperbolic discount curves from two rewards of different sizes available at different times (vertical dashed lines). The smaller-sooner reward is temporarily valued higher (preferred) for a period just before it’s available, as shown by the portion of its curve that projects above that of the later-larger reward.Where V is value, A is the undiscounted reward value, D is delay and k is a constant describing the individual subjects degree of impatience. Functions in this class are referred to as hyperbolic as contrasted with exponential functions which model temporal discounting as occurring at a fixed rate over time.A1 + kDV=
7FOUR WAYS TO MAKE THE “SELF-CONTROLLED” CHOICE Extrapsychic mechanisms (e.g. “precommitment”)Control of attentionPreparation of emotionPersonal rules (i.e., “will-power”)
8THE MELIORATION THEORY OF ADDICTION Herrnstein, R.J., & Prelec, D. (1992). A theory of addiction. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice Over Time (pp ). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Heyman, G.M. (in press). Consumption dependent changes in reward value: a framework for understanding addiction. In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
9MELIORATION ADDICTION BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES 2Local Utility of Drug ConsumptionOverall Utility13Local Utility of Other Activities4AbstinenceHeavy drug useRelative Behavioural Allocation to Drug Consumption[Drug Consumption/ (Drug Consumption + Other Activities)]
10RATIONAL ADDICTIONBecker, G.S., & Murphy, K.M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96,Skog, O.-J. (1999). Rationality, irrationality and addiction: notes on Becker and Murphy's theory of addiction. In J. Elster and O.-J. Skog (Eds.), Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press:Chaloupka, F.J., Emery, S. & Liang, L. (in press). Evolving models of addictive behavior: from neoclassical to behavioral economics. In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
11RATIONAL ADDICTION BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES Utility of Drug Consumption213Utility of Other ActivitiesMarginal Utility of Drug Consumption4Abstinence(No Stock)Heavy Drug Use(High Stock)Stock of Addictive Capital
12RACHLIN’S RELATIVE THEORY OF ADDICTION Rachlin, H. (1997). Four teleological theories of addiction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4,Rachlin, H. (2000). The Science of Self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Rachlin, H. (in press). Economic concepts in the behavioural study of addiction. In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
13RELATIVE ADDICTION BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES 2143Price sensitization of Social InteractionPrice Habituation of Drug ConsumptionLess drug use/more socializationMore drug use/less socializationRelative Behavioural Allocation to Drug Consumption and Social Interaction
14APPLICATIONS TO TREATMENT (1) Ainslie’s theory obviously relevant to self-control or self-management techniques developed in early 1970s (e.g., Mahoney and Thoresen 1974; Thoresen and Mahoney 1974)Also relevant to cognitive therapy (e.g., Beck et al. 1993)May also be relevant to the “mechanism” of motivational interviewingSeveral aspects of modern cognitive-behavioural approaches to treatment can be interpreted within a behavioural economics framework (e.g. self-efficacy, relapse prevention)
15APPLICATIONS TO TREATMENT (2) Behavioural economic principles more generally have been applied successfully to contingency management programs (e.g. Community Reinforcement Approach) – see work of Bickel, Higgins and colleaguesBut can these “reframings” of existing treatment modalities lead to improvements in effectiveness?And can the behavioural economic perspective lead to quite novel methods of treatment?
16APPLICATIONS TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ORGANISATION OF TREATMENT SERVICES (1) Tucker, J.A. & Simpson, C.A. (in press). Merging behavioural economic and public health approaches to the delivery of services for substance abuse: concepts and applications. In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Ways of closing the currently existing gap between need and utilization and policies for allocating limited intervention resources in a more cost-effective manner across the population in need.Perhaps the main advantage of the behavioural economic perspective over other perspectives on service provision is its inherent emphasis on behavioural alternatives to addiction.
17APPLICATIONS TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ORGANISATION OF TREATMENT SERVICES (2) Applying the behavioural economic perspective to the organization of treatment services views care-seeking and adherence as choice processes.To facilitate care-seeking and adherence one should attempt to make services more attractive and easier to access, and thus very different from the intense, high-threshold services that have dominated addiction treatment in the past.
18APPLICATIONS TO PREVENTION AND PUBLIC POLICY McCoun, R. (in press). Is the addiction concept useful for drug policy? In R.E. Vuchinich & N. Heather (Eds.), Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.McCoun’s answer is “No” and that applies too to behavioural choice theories of addiction.Behavioural choice theories have the implication that increases in the price of addictive substances will lead to lower levels of use and therefore harm. But that again is hardly novel.
19POTENTIAL USEFULNESS OF BEHAVIOURAL CHOICE THEORIES “There is nothing so useful as a good theory” (Kurt Lewin, 1951)i.e., if a theory provides an accurate and adequate explanation for the occurrence of an observable phenomenon, it must, by definition, contain within it the means of changing that phenomenonIt may be that the main influence of behavioural choice theories will be, not on the “technology” of treatment or public health and prevention policies, but on the way addiction is generally understood