3 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Simmel’s Sociology:Intellectual Roots:Hegel: Dialectics (also Simmel’s conception of ‘alienation’)Kant and Categories of Thought
4 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Hegel’s Influence: Individual and Society as a Dialectical ProcessAntithesis(Conformity)Thesis(Distinction)Synthesis(The Social Individual)‘[Social Man] is not partially social and partially individual; rather, his existence is shaped by a fundamental unity, which cannot be accounted for in any other way than through the synthesis or coincidence of two logically contradictory determinations: man is both social link and being for himself, both product of society and life from an autonomous centre’ (Simmel, 1908).‘The individual is determined at the same time as he is determining; he is acted upon at the same time as he is self-actuating’ (Coser, 1977).
5 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Kant – Making Sense of ExperienceNoumena: Things as they are in themselves.Phenomena: Things as they appear to us.When we look at the world we experience it through our senses, as phenomena. We impose ‘form’ on our phenomenal experience - through categories that are assimilated from our culture.NoumenaPhenomena
6 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Natur & Geist (Nature & Spirit) –Simmel seeks a middle ground between two of the major traditions of his time.Organic ‘evolution’ of social whole v. History as a collection of unique events
7 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 ‘Society is merely the name for a number of individuals connected by interaction’
8 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Conversely?‘Sociology asks what happens to men and by what rules they behave, not insofar as they unfold their individual existences in their totalities, but insofar as they form groups and are determined by their group existence because of interaction’
9 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Formal Sociology:The Focus of Sociology is neither ‘social facts’ nor ‘social action’ but social Interaction or ‘sociation’.
10 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Forms: Patterns of interaction that are apparent across a broad range of varying social and historical situations.Social relationships either neither determined by external constraints nor are they utterly haphazard and unique to specific situations. Recurrent forms emerge from the process of interaction itself.
11 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 FormsSuperordination and SubordinationConflict and Cooperation
12 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 FormsCentralisation and DecentralisationIntimacy and Distance
13 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Social ‘Types’ – ‘The type becomes what he is through his relations with others who assign him a particular position and expect him to behave in specific ways. His characteristics are seen as attributes of the social structure’ (Coser, 1977).The Adventurer: One who ‘breaks the continuity of everyday life’The Renegade: One who disrupts the social groupThe (Man) in the Middle: The person who stands half way between leader and subordinate within the social group.
14 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Social ‘Types’The Mediator: The person who may act impartially to resolve disputes or, alternatively, who may manipulate disputes between other group members for advantage.The Poor: The person at the bottom of society, defined by his or her dependence on other’s welfare and benevolence.The Stranger: The person who is present, but always distant from the group (Simmel?). The Stranger is a permanent member (geographically close), but always retains a critical (psychological, emotional and cultural) distance from the other members.
15 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Social DifferentiationThe Significance of ‘Numbers’Dyads: Two person group with no independent structure – individuality not challenged by the group.Tryads: With a three person group a stratification system becomes possible. There is an expansion of potential social roles and relationships.
16 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 ‘The Web of Group Affiliations’‘Concentric’ (see Traditional Society)
17 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 ‘Multiple and across diverse groups’ (see Modern Urban Society)More Social Differentiation = Less ‘concentric’ and more ‘multiple’Group 1The IndividualGroup 3Group 2
18 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Individual & SocietySubjective Culture: Internalised CultureObjective Culture: Reified Cultural Production
19 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 SimmelModernity, The Works & The Legacy
20 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Simmel & the Modern CityTraditional Life: Individuals are bound closely to the group, but by very few ties.Urban Way of Life: Individuals have more loose affiliations and personal freedoms, but are more dependent on, and more constrained by, the formal relationships and organisation of society as a whole.
21 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 The Metropolis and Mental Life (1902)‘The deeper problems of modern life derive from the claim of the individual to preserve the autonomy and individuality of his existence in the face of overwhelming social forces…’ (Simmel, 1902).
22 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Fashion (1904) :Provides a suitable vehicle for observing the dialectical relationship between conformity and distinctiveness in urban society.Allows the demonstration of a degree of distinction amongst the urban mass and, simultaneously, indicates our affiliation and conformity to the group.
23 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 For Simmel "... fashion represents nothing more than one of the many forms of life by the aid of which we seek to combine in uniform spheres of activity the tendency towards social equalization with the desire for individual differentiation and change." (F, p. 133) In each social relation there are two forces at work: one pushing us to bind ourselves to others through imitation, and another pushing us to unbind ourselves from others, to undo the social network, through distinction. But social life changes in so far as the balance between the socialising force and the de-socialising force is always unstable and provisional. Fashion is an example of the way in which actual social life always includes in some way its own opposite, an asocial life (Benvenuto, 2000).
24 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 The Philosophy of Money (1900)Distance : Money allows human beings to interact in a more impersonal manner- provides a medium of exchange whilst removing the need for interpersonal bargaining and reciprocity. This removes restrictions on exchange.Money & Value : The value of numerous objects and activities is made objective through being measured in monetary terms rather than subjective desire.
25 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 The Philosophy of Money (1900)Calculation: Money renders many relationships and exchanges open to calculation.Rationalization: Interactions and relationships become more rational (due to the calculability afforded by money).Reification: Money becomes both an end in itself and a major feature of the ‘objective culture’ that limits human freedom.
26 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 ‘The Tragedy of Culture’ :The differentiation and diffusion that holds the potential for individual freedom is countered by the weight of the reified culture of urban society.
27 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies (1906)‘Non-Knowledge’ & LyingSecret Societies:Reciprocity & ProtectionDistinction & De-individuationThreat (to society?)
28 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Durkheim, Marx, Weber, Simmel&The Relationship between Individual & Society
29 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Simmel’ Legacy: Interactionism & Phenomenology:The Chicago School, SI & ‘The Interaction Order’Schutz – Berger & Luckmann ‘The Social Construction of Reality’
30 Thinking Sociologically SO3066 Simmel’s Legacy: ‘Forms’ and the Individual/Society DialecticElias & ‘Figurations’Giddens & ‘Structuration’