Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Stereotyping. Lectures 3 & 4: Social Stereotyping Bargh, J.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Stereotyping. Lectures 3 & 4: Social Stereotyping Bargh, J.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype."— Presentation transcript:

1 Stereotyping

2 Lectures 3 & 4: Social Stereotyping Bargh, J.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype efects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (pp ). New York: Guilford. Blair, I.V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, Hilton, J., & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, Macrae, C.N., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2000). Social Cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, Lecture 1 – Stereotype Activation Lecture 1 – Stereotype Activation Lecture 2 – Stereotype Application

3 What Are Stereotypes? There is neither time nor opportunity for intimate acquaintances. Instead we notice a trait which marks a well known type and fill in the rest of the picture by means of the stereotypes we carry about in our heads. Our stereotyped world is not necessarily the world we should like it to be. It is simply the kind of world we expect it to be. Walter Lippmann (1922)

4 Stereotype Components Culturally shared beliefs cognitive component (beliefs) affective component (feelings) behavioural component (actions) Categorical associations men are …? accountants are…? Italians are…?

5 How De We Learn Stereotypes?

6 A Chilling Example! Children (24-28 months) touch more own sex gender-typed toys (Levy,1999).

7 Who Should Repair the Car? Levy, Sadovsky, & Troseth (2000) preschoolers (3-4 years) viewed men as more competent than women in male sex-typed jobs and women as more competent than men in feminine jobs.

8 Habits of Thought What happens if childhood socialization repeatedly furnishes one with stereotype-related beliefs? Do stereotypes become habits of mind?

9 Is Stereotype Activation Inevitable? every event has certain marks that serve as a cue to bring the category of prejudgment into action…A person with dark brown skin will activate whatever concept of African American is dominant in our mind. Allport (1954, p. 21) the mere presentation of a stimulus person activates certain classification processes that occur automatically and without conscious intent. Brewer (1988, p. 5)

10 …because the stereotype has been frequently activated in the past, it is a well-learned set of associations that is automatically activated in the presence of a member (or symbolic equivalent) of the target group. Devine (1989, p. 6) Devine (1989, p. 6)

11 The Basic Problem! On exposure to a target, what gets activated in mind?

12 Measuring Stereotype Activation: Semantic Priming Tasks

13 Forgetful skillful

14 Automatic Activation: Some Early Evidence Dovidio et al. (1986)Dovidio et al. (1986) stereotypes are knowledge structures associative networks semantic priming to access associative knowledge letter string taskletter string taskdoctor/nursedoctor/butter

15 Dovidio et als (1986) Paradigm: Could X ever be true of Y? Task (verification task) participants presented with a priming label (i.e., black or white) followed shortly afterwards by a personality trait (e.g., musical) or non-person descriptor (e.g., metallic) Traits WhiteBlack ambitiousmusical practicalsensitive conventionallazy stubbornimitative

16 Results participants responded more quickly when stereotypic than non-stereotypic items were presented Problems? task demands (triggering category activation) labels (or words and images functionally equivalent?)

17 The Invisible Prime: Purdue & Gurtman (1990) kind is the word favorable or unfavorable? traits preceded by subliminal labels (old or young)traits preceded by subliminal labels (old or young) Results - facilitatory priming observedResults - facilitatory priming observed Problems - words, evaluative (rather than semantic) primingProblems - words, evaluative (rather than semantic) priming

18 Devines (1989) Two-Process Model power of childhood socializationpower of childhood socialization acquiring cultural beliefs societal knowledge vs. personal beliefs individual differences in prejudiceindividual differences in prejudice high vs. low prejudice components of stereotypingcomponents of stereotyping automatic activation controlled inhibition replacing stereotypes with personal beliefs

19 Knowledge of Cultural Stereotypes Stereotype Contents bagpipes booze stingy bigots = humanitarians (Devine, 1989)

20 Evaluate Donald Paradigm (Devine, 1989) Tasks Phase 1: parafoveal vigilance task (Negroes, lazy, blues, Blacks, Africa, basketball) Phase 2: person evaluation (Donald - Srull & Wyer, 1979) - ambiguously hostile behaviours Results:high-P participants rated Donald to be more hostile than did low-P participants

21 Automatic Stereotyping: A Slight Modification Lepore & Brown (1997)Lepore & Brown (1997) categories vs. traits (Blacks vs. lazy) - what activates the stereotype? stereotype? category primes: only high-P participants activate the stereotypecategory primes: only high-P participants activate the stereotype trait primes:both high-P and low-P participants activate thetrait primes:both high-P and low-P participants activate the stereotype stereotype individual differences in stereotype activation (Locke et al., 1994; Wittenbrink et al., 1997)individual differences in stereotype activation (Locke et al., 1994; Wittenbrink et al., 1997)

22 Challenging Orthodoxy: Is Stereotype Activation Really Inevitable? triggering stereotype activation (are images and words equivalent?)triggering stereotype activation (are images and words equivalent?) Belly Dancer

23 Determinants of Stereotype Activation: Target Salience frequency of occurrencefrequency of occurrence are you unusual? immediate contextimmediate context are you contextually distinctive? processing goalsprocessing goals are you relevant to my current processing concerns?

24 Statistical Frequency: Langer et al. (1976)

25 Solo or Token Status: Taylor & Fiske (1978)

26 Processing Goals chronic states of the person (Moskowitz et al. 2004)chronic states of the person (Moskowitz et al. 2004) traits, motives, goals transitory factors (Macrae et al., 1997)transitory factors (Macrae et al., 1997) temporary goals

27 Stereotype Activation: Always or Sometimes?

28 Stereotypes as Mental Tools: Gilbert & Hixon (1991) anyone who has ever lent a socket wrench to a forgetful neighbor knows that a tool is useful only if one can find it. Stereotypes are forms of information and, as such, are thought to be stored in memory in a dormant state until they are activated for use. Gilbert & Hixon (1991, p. 510) attention and stereotypingattention and stereotyping

29 Gilbert & Hixon (1991): Busyness and Stereotyping Task participants observe a woman (Caucasian or Asian) turning over cards with a single word fragment written on each card. POLI_E complete the fragment with the first word that comes to mind (SHY, SHORT, RICE) - participants busy (digit rehearsal) or non-busy (control) Results: only non-busy participants activate the stereotype (i.e., conditional automaticity) conditional automaticity)

30 Processing Goals: The Inattentive Shopper (Macrae et al. 1997)

31 Processing Goals ambitious (emotional) (flubitorso) 3 Tasks: animacy (conceptual) dot (perceptual) detection

32 Category Accessibility Macrae et al. (1997)

33 Accessing Stereotypical Knowledge Macrae et al. (1997) in spot of botherMacrae et al. (1997) in spot of bother beyond the hopeful implication that dermatologists are unlikely to stereotype their patients, what is the real-world relevance of studies involving such pre-semantic processing goals? Bargh (1999)

34 Context and Stereotype Activation: Wittenbrink et al. (2001) In an evaluative priming task, activation of African- American stereotype was moderated by the context in which targets were located.

35 Summary Things Worth Knowing 1.What are stereotypes? 2.Process and consequences of stereotype activation Next Week 1. Stereotype Application

36 Lecture 4: Stereotype Application

37 Why Do People Apply Stereotypes? personality approaches socio-cultural accounts cognitive perspective

38 Applying Stereotypes: Possessing a Dodgy Personality authoritarian personality (Adorno et al., 1950) intra-psychic conflict from childhood (internalized values of the father) is projected to other people (members of minority groups – ethnic, relgious, political) - societal scapegoating.

39 Applying Stereotypes: Learning to Discriminate socio-cultural approaches (e.g., realistic conflict theory, Sherif & Sherif, 1953) stereotypes are conceptualized as negative beliefs about a group that serve to legitimize the existing social structure (i.e., system justification)

40 Applying Stereotypes: Cognitive Efficiency cognitive perspective (Hamilton, 1981) stereotyping is a product of category activation and basic cognitive limitations.

41 Applying Stereotypes: Basic Paradox perils of stereotypical thinking discrimination prejudice legal sanctions benefits of stereotypical thinking cognitive efficiency

42 What Can Stereotyping Do For You? content-related effects structural effects (processing consequences) perception memory attention

43 Accessing Stereotype Contents: Target Enrichment semantic knowledge (Fiske & Neuberg, 1990) traits behaviours opinions lifestyle indirect person knowledge

44 Stereotypes and Information Processing: Perceptual Effects does stereotype application moderate the ease with which people can detect information in the world? if so, which type of information is most facilitated?

45 Activating Social Stereotypes: A Functional Analysis stereotypical thinking is functional (Allport, 1954)stereotypical thinking is functional (Allport, 1954) reducing the information-processing burdenreducing the information-processing burden ease of detection perceptual identification measurement issues - climbing inside the headmeasurement issues - climbing inside the head

46 The Need For Speed: Categorical Person Perception is Efficient perils of a cluttered mindperils of a cluttered mind enter the cognitive miser target simplification/elaboration some cognitive benefitssome cognitive benefits stimulus location stimulus identification category primingcategory priming

47 Find the Word (Stereotype Priming): Congruent vs. Irrelevant QHAPPYTVQHAPPYTVDPVMNIOBDPVMNIOBAELQBYVTAELQBYVTRNMKVREARNMKVREAIPMIVWMLIPMIVWMLNCCNYTALNCCNYTALGMLDYTVRGMLDYTVRGSHNLRIOGSHNLRIOQHAPPYTVQHAPPYTVDPVMNIOBDPVMNIOBAELQBYVTAELQBYVTRNMKVREARNMKVREAIPMIVWMLIPMIVWMLNCCNYTALNCCNYTALGMLDYTVRGMLDYTVRGSHNLRIOGSHNLRIO

48 Find the Words Macrae et al. (1994). Number of Words

49 Stimulus Identification repeated presentation of degraded wordsrepeated presentation of degraded words dot density mask whats the word?whats the word? number of trials taken

50 v

51

52 Identify the Word Number of Presentations Macrae et al. (1994)

53 Stereotypes and Information Processing: Attentional Effects does stereotype application preserve valuable attentional resources? if so, when does this take place?

54 Person Impressions: With and Without Stereotypes NigelJulian (doctor)(artist) caringcreative honesttemperamental reliablesensitive responsibleunconventional upstandingindividualistic unluckyfearless forgetfulactive passivecordial clumsyprogressive enthusiasticgenerous

55 Facts about Indonesia

56 Person Memory Macrae et al. (1994)

57 Knowledge about Indonesia? Macrae et al. (1994)

58 Efficiency and Automaticity stereotypical efficiency - conscious or unconscious?stereotypical efficiency - conscious or unconscious? overt or covert allocation of attention?overt or covert allocation of attention? probe-reaction tasksprobe-reaction tasks turn off the sound

59 Person Impressions: With and Without Visible and Invisible Stereotypes NigelJulian (doctor)(artist) caringcreative honesttemperamental reliablesensitive responsibleunconventional upstandingindividualistic unluckyfearless forgetfulactive passivecordial clumsyprogressive enthusiasticgenerous 3 conditions: (i)category-supraliminal (ii)category-subliminal (iii)no category Auditory Probe Reaction Task

60 How Quickly Can You Turn Off the Sound ? Macrae et al. (1994)

61 Stereotyping is Efficient Stereotypes (i) guide perception (ii) organize memories (iii) preserve attention Is stereotyping Intentional? awareness consent

62 When are Stereotypes Most Likely to Be Deployed? Stereotypes save people the trouble of thinking (Gilbert & Hixon, 1991) Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics motivation (e.g., involvement) speed (e.g., times pressures) attention (e.g., competing tasks)

63 Stereotype Application: A Brief Review Task Complexity simple vs. complex judgments (Bodenhausen & Lichtenstein, 1987) information overload (Bodenhausen & Wyer, 1985) Time Pressures Dijker & Koomen (1996) Dual Tasking cognitive load (Gilbert & Hixon, 1991) Involvement with Target outcome dependence (Neuberg & Fiske, 1987) accountability (Tetlock, 1983)

64 Are You A Morning Person? Bodenhausen (1990)

65 Reaching Your Peak attention and stereotypingattention and stereotyping stereotypes as heuristics laboratory manipulationslaboratory manipulations naturalistic factorsnaturalistic factors circadian variations morning vs. evening people

66 Meeting Linda Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations.Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations. Which of the following is more likely to be true?Which of the following is more likely to be true? Linda is a bank teller. Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement.

67 Conjunction Fallacy the erroneous belief that the joint probability of two events is greater than the probability of either of the constituent events separately.the erroneous belief that the joint probability of two events is greater than the probability of either of the constituent events separately.

68 Committing the Conjunction Fallacy Bodenhausen (1990)

69 Unresolved Issues: So What Exactly Gets Activated?

70 The Problem of Multiple Construal categorical competitioncategorical competition the winner takes it allthe winner takes it all but where do the losers go? consequences of category dominanceconsequences of category dominance

71 A Wee Digression - Is That My Beer? The Case of Competing Actions

72 Is That My (Car) Parking Space? The Case of Competing Memories

73 What Does It Mean? Linguistic Ambiguity Under cover of darkness, Brian slipped into the port.Under cover of darkness, Brian slipped into the port. It can be fun playing with your hair.It can be fun playing with your hair. It happened at the bank.It happened at the bank.

74 Resolving Mental Conflict: Inhibition evolved solutionsevolved solutions cognitive inhibition dampening competing representations conflict resolution inhibition and category activationinhibition and category activation

75 The Case of the Asian Woman: Macrae et al. (1995)

76 Priming Categories dynamics of multiple construaldynamics of multiple construal priming categoriespriming categories winners & losers are the losers inhibited?

77 Experiment 1: Parafoveal Priming Phase 1 - parafoveal priming (women or Chinese)Phase 1 - parafoveal priming (women or Chinese) Phase 2 - view videotape (Chinese woman reading a book)Phase 2 - view videotape (Chinese woman reading a book) Phase 3 - lexical decision task (category accessibility)Phase 3 - lexical decision task (category accessibility)

78 Stereotype Accessibility Macrae et al. (1995)

79 Priming Through Behavior

80 Experiment 2 Phase 1 - view videotapePhase 1 - view videotape eating with chopsticks vs. applying cosmetics Phase 2 - lexical decision task (category accessibility)Phase 2 - lexical decision task (category accessibility)

81 Stereotype Accessibility Macrae et al. (1995)

82 Inhibition and Category Selection dealing with conflictdealing with conflict cognitive inhibition nature of inhibitionnature of inhibition lateral vs. strategic role of processing goalsrole of processing goals Sinclair & Kunda (1999)

83 Motivation and Inhibition: Sinclair & Kunda (1999) Favorable feedback - activate doctor, inhibit Black Unfavorable feedback - activate Black, inhibit doctor

84 Consequences of Category Activation identity salienceidentity salience which identity dominates behavioral consequences stereotype threatstereotype threat scholastic performance (Steele & Aronson, 1995) math test, diagnostic of abilities competing identitiescompeting identities performance conflicts

85 Math Test: Shih et al. (1999) American & Canadian samples Asian vs. female identity

86 Task Performance

87 Summary Things Worth Knowing 1.When and Why Do People Stereotype Others? Next Week 1.The Automaticity of Everyday Life


Download ppt "Stereotyping. Lectures 3 & 4: Social Stereotyping Bargh, J.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google