Presentation on theme: "Historical Methods: ‘Doing Time’ in Social Research"— Presentation transcript:
1Historical Methods: ‘Doing Time’ in Social Research Dr. Richie Nimmo
2Historical Social Research Methods ● Last week: Visual ‘data’ and visual methods.● This week: Historical sources and historical methods.The Roots of Historical Sociology…In its origins Sociology was an attempt to come to terms with a historical transformation – the emergence of capitalist commercialisation and industrialisation in Europe (i.e. modernity).Classical sociology was both a product of and a reaction to this dramatic shift.Therefore classical sociology was thoroughly historical in its aims and scope – it was a historical sociology of modernity.
3But despite the historical consciousness that informed early E.g. ● Marx was centrally concerned with the historical development ofindustrial capitalism and the class divisions it gave rise to.● Durkheim’s sociology focussed on the social consequences of theadvanced division of labour and the differences between modernand traditional societies.● Weber analysed the historical spread of instrumental rationalityand the growth of large-scale bureaucratic organisation.But despite the historical consciousness that informed earlysociology, historical methods are often missing from socialresearch training courses.As a result, fewer and fewer emerging researchers are equippedwith the necessary skills to undertake historical research.
4Why study Historical Methods? C. Wright-Mills: “Every social science – or, better, every wellconsidered social study – requires an historical scope ofconception and a full use of historical materials.”(The Sociological Imagination, 1959, p. 145).The argument: Without some understanding of the past and of historical processes, one can only hope for an impoverished understanding of the present.Heraclitus – ‘You cannot step into thesame river twice’.i.e. Like a river, social life is never staticor fixed, but is constantly changing, soeverything is always in motion, in flux.
5‘Doing Time’: Approaches to history So time (or the temporal dimension) is key feature of social life.But there are different ways of ‘doing time’ in social research.One key division is between:► Research which attempts to understand societies of the past.► Research which explores how our notions of the past, and even our perceptions of time, are socially constructed in the present.
6Researching Societies of the Past Historical social research can be roughly divided into 2 broadapproaches:i) ‘Social’ History (macro)Focuses upon historical changes in social structure and broad structuraltransformations.ii) ‘Cultural’ History (micro)A more ethnographic approach focussing upon the details of everydaylives in past societies and the way that people have created meaning andviewed their worlds.► This division broadly corresponds to the structure/agency divide insociology.
7‘Macro’ Social History According to Theda Skocpol – “Truly historical sociological studieshave some or all of the following characteristics:1. they ask questions about social structures or processes understood to be concretely situated in time and space.2. they address processes over time, and take temporal sequences seriously in accounting for outcomes.3. they focus on the interplay of meaningful actions and structural contexts in making sense of the unfolding of unintended as well as intended outcomes in individual lives and social transformations.4. they highlight the particular and varying features of specific kinds of social change.”(Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, 1984, p.1).
8‘Second Wave’ Historical Sociology ► The ‘macro’ historical sociology of the 1970’s and 1980’s is sometimes called the ‘Second Wave’ (the first wave was the classical sociologies of Marx and Weber).► The ‘second wave’ was a reaction against the a-historical approach of the structural-functionalism dominant in the mid-20th century.Key second-wave figures included:● Barrington Moore ● The Annales School ● Reinhard Bendix● Charles Tilly ● E. P. Thompson ● Immanuel Wallerstein● Theda Skocpol ● Michael Mann ● Perry Anderson► All these in different ways tried to think about some of the questions raised by Marx and Weber’s approaches which they had not satisfactorily answered.
9● The relationship between social classes and the state. Central topics of concern for ‘second wave’ historical sociologists were:● The relationship between social classes and the state.● The comparative dynamics of state-formation.● The relative importance of politics and economics in structural social transformation.● The comparative dynamics of revolutionary social change.So the ‘second wave’ was a combination of political-economic analysis, structural (macro) sociology, and comparative historical analysis.► This approach was called into question by the ‘cultural turn’, with its new understandings of time and its emphasis on non-class-based social identities such as ethnicity, gender and sexuality.
10From ‘Social’ to ‘Cultural’ History ■ The 1980’s saw an explosion of ‘macro’ structural history, which led some to hail ‘the rise of historical sociology’(Dennis Smith, 1991)■ The 1990’s saw a shift from ‘macro’ historical sociology to a new ‘cultural history’, as part of the ‘cultural turn’ across the social sciences (also called the ‘linguistic turn’)■ The cultural turn involved a new emphasis upon the role of language and meaning-making processes in social life and the relationship of language to social reality.■ The cultural turn also saw the development of different approaches to history and different ways of ‘doing time’ in social research.
11The New ‘Cultural History’ The ‘cultural turn’ has had 2 main impacts upon historicalresearch:i) New understandings of ‘time’ have emerged.Rather than an objective force moving forward in a linear process outside of society, providing a framework in which society is located, the concept of time has come to be seen as the product of social and cultural processes, and even as ‘socially constructed’.ii) New scepticism concerning claims about ‘the past’:The notion of historical research as a process of discovering ‘how things really were’ has been widely challenged. Instead ‘the past’ is increasingly seen as a narrative which is constructed through historical writing.
12i) New understandings of ‘time’: Taking each of these in turn:i) New understandings of ‘time’:● It is important to understand that this new understanding of time does notmean that ‘time’ in the sense of natural processes of change such as theseasons are merely fictional.● What it means is that our concepts of time, our understandings of time,are socially and culturally specific – in this sense time is sociallyconstructed.► E.g. Our concepts of time emerge from social practices, rituals and ceremonies marking the passage of time, from habits and traditions of remembering the past, from practices of record-keeping and other ways of ‘storing’ time, from story-telling and from history books themselves.These things not only construct ‘the past’ as a sequence of meaningfulevents, they also construct ‘time’ itself, meaning our consciousness of thepassage of time and of how the present is located within it.
13■ Anthropologists have shown that the view of ‘time’ as a linear andobjective force is a peculiarlyWestern and modern notion.■ It may be misleading to view allsocial history in terms of this linearmodel of time.The argument: Instead we need to understand how past societies have constituted time and how they have interpreted and experienced the passage of time.■ This shift towards a more cultural view of time has seen traditional approaches challenged by research which addresses the various social practices that ‘construct’ time.■ But this is not straightforward – there were many early examples of more cultural approaches, and there are still historical sociologists who pursue a broadly structural approach.
14ii) New scepticism concerning claims about ‘the past’: ● This have been associated with post-modernism.● Traditionally historical methodology has been rooted in empiricism (reliance upon ‘the facts’, ‘the evidence’, ‘the sources’).● Although the role of interpretation was acknowledged, historical research was seen as a process of determining ‘the truth’ about the past through rigorous scrutiny of the available evidence.● This commonsense view of historical methods has increasingly been called into question.After the ‘cultural turn’, it has been widely argued that our methodsof researching and writing history are not ways of finding ‘the truth’about the past, but ways to construct a model or ‘version’ of thepast, which we then think of as ‘real’ and ‘objective’.
15■ “History is not just there, awaiting the researcher’s discovery ■ “History is not just there, awaiting the researcher’s discovery. Unlike a forgotten poem, the ruins of a cathedral, or a lost law code that might be uncovered, history has no existence before it is written.” (Howell and Preventier, 2001, 1)■ From this perspective, historical writing is constitutive of history, it actively shapes ‘history’ as an object-of-knowledge (i.e. as something we claim to know).■ This view has stronger and weaker forms, from the ultra-postmodernist notion that all history is fiction, to the more moderate argument that all historical research is a partial and interpretative exercise rather than an objective representation of the past.■ But the debate between postmodernists and traditional empiricists has often been divided into two opposing camps.
16■ Despite this polarisation however, the post-modern challenge is less radical than it first seems. ■ Historians have always known that ‘history’ is slippery, hence the emphasis given to careful interpretation of ‘reliable sources’.■ So the idea that historical writing ‘constitutes’ or ‘constructs’ history has not led to the meltdown of empirical history, but it has led to greater awareness of the ‘reflexive dimension’ of historical research.■ i.e. how the categories of explanation that we use profoundly shape our view of the past, and how accounts of the past are always bound up with the society, culture and politics of the present.
17The Tradition of Source-Criticism “Differences over the character of history as a discipline for acquiringknowledge of the past are hardly a recent development. Debates overapproaches to knowledge, understanding and explanation in the historicaland social sciences have been going on for generations, indeed centuries.recent skirmishes over postmodernism have merely added some newtwists to old scepticisms.” (Mary Fulbrook, 2002, p. 3)Therefore a balanced view would be that there is no case:► Either for a naïve empiricism, which fails to acknowledge that historicalresearch is unavoidably caught up in reflexive questions of interpretationand representation.► Nor for a refusal to engage in empirical historical research in the name of philosophical uncertainty.So the skills of source-criticism are still central to historical research.
18Lecture 1: Key Points Summary ■ Classical Sociology thoroughly historical in its approach.■ Society is always changing, therefore understanding society means taking account of the time (the ‘temporal dimension’).■ This can mean:i) Researching past societiesii) Researching how perceptions of time are shaped by society (or ‘socially constructed’)■ There are two broad approaches to researching past societies:a) Social history (macro)b) Cultural history (micro)
19■ Second Wave historical Sociology (1970’s, 80’s) focussed on macro-structural transformations from a Marxist-inspired perspective.■ This was partly displaced in 1990’s by a new Cultural History, which was part of the wider ‘Cultural Turn’ in social science.■ New emphasis on influence of language on how we perceive reality (associated with post-modernism).■ The Cultural Turn had two main impacts on historical research:1) New understanding of time as socially and culturally constructed.2) New scepticism concerning the truth-claims of historians.■ This has led to more critical attention being given to the role of interpretation in history.■ But the skills of source-criticism remain the core of historical social research.
20Historical Methods:Working with historical sources
21The Challenge of Historical Sources ■ Some historical research is ethnographic in nature, such as oral history, which commonly involves talking to participants about their memories of the past.■ But where social research involves studying the past that is beyond living memory, it is different from ethnography in that there is no direct access to the phenomena of interest.■ An ethnographer writes his/her field notes after direct observation of social interaction. This means they are able to continually mould their ‘data’ and to select what is relevant during the observation/interaction itself.■ It is very different with historical documents or ‘sources’ – you cannot interact with sources in the same way as living people.
22E.g. In an interview, the researcher can ask questions which relate more or less directly to their researchproblem, they can steer the interview accordingly,seek clarification or elaboration, etc.► The ethnographic researcher can draw upon theirinterpretative skills to narrow the range of ‘data’ from thebeginning, so that a good portion of their field notes arelikely to be directly relevant to their research.It is not possible to do the same with an archive:► The researcher has to work with the availablesources.► Often this will mean having to plough throughreams of documents before finding something useful.
23► Therefore historical research can be very labour-intensive compared to othermethods of social research.► Contrary to the view that historicalresearch is ‘easy’ because it doesnot involve interacting with people,historical research is extremelychallenging, involving long hoursof sometimes painstaking work inthe isolation of the archive.► Much of this work will produce nothing that will ever make it intothe final research writing.► So historical research requires better-than-average reservesof patience, dedication and perseverance.
24Types of Historical Sources “Historical Sources encompass everykind of evidence which human beingshave left of their past activities – thewritten word and the spoken word,the shape of the landscape and thematerial artefact, the fine arts as wellas photography and film.”(John Tosh, The Pursuit of History, 1991, 30)But in practice most sources are written documents. This is because:● From the high middle-ages (c ) onwards, the written wordsurvives in greater abundance than any other source for Westernhistory.● The 15th and 16th centuries witnessed a marked growth in recordkeeping by the state and other corporate bodies, as well as the rapidspread of printing
25Documents: Types of Written Sources The main kinds of documents used as historicalsources are:● Newspapers● ‘Records’:- State records- Church records- Local government records- The records of private associations and corporations● Private correspondence (letters, diaries)● Autobiographies/memoirs● Novels and creative literature
26Newspapers – The most important published primary source for historical researchers. Newspapers are composed with a view to their impact on contemporary public opinion. This can make them quite reliable as long as editorial ‘bias’ is considered. But as published sources they contain only what is considered fit for public consumption, which may restrict or distort what is printed.Autobiographies/Memoirs – Can provide an insight into personal life but autobiographies tend to recount only what people of the time would have found noteworthy, which may not be what interests us now.State/Government Archives – The largest body of unpublished records in most countries. The oldest surviving state archives date back to the twelfth century. Government records are of obvious value to researchers who want to examine the workings of the state and the machinery of power.
27Church Records – “The records of the church courts are more interesting than might seem likely at first glance, because so many moral misdemeanours of ordinary people come within their jurisdiction… the records of these courts are therefore an invaluable source for the social historian.” (Tosh, 1991, p. 41)Local Government – Enable the social historian to undertake comparative analysis of different geographical areas, or to explore one locale in great detail.Records of Private Associations – These would include the records of universities, guilds, trades unions, political parties, pressure groups, landed families and businesses. These records of ‘civil society’ increase dramatically from the 15th century onwards and can be used to supplement church and state records.
28The Hierarchy of Sources ■ Primary Sources – These are original sources produced during the period of interest. They are further divided into published and unpublished primary sources.■ Secondary sources – These are what historians have written about the past (the historians may not be from out own time, e.g. they could be much closer to ‘the past’ they write about).Traditionally historians have seen primary sources as superior to secondary sources, and unpublished sources as superior topublished sources.
29This traditional hierarchy of sources has recently been challenged on the grounds that it is too simplistic…► It assumes that some sourcesare closer to ‘the ‘truth’ thanothers, but a more sociologicalapproach would acknowledgethat all sources are bound upwith the social relations ofthe time they were producedin, so that no source is more‘true’ than another.► Instead all sources are partial(or ‘biased’) in different ways.
30Locating Sources: Knowing where to look ● Given the range and scope of historical documents in existence, especially from the 18th century onwards, archive fieldwork can be daunting. You will need a ‘roadmap’ to help you to locate useful sources.The first thing to consider is the various kinds of archive:● Copyright libraries - The British Library, Cambridge, Oxford: Legally entitled (since 1757) to a free copy of every book or pamphlet published in the UK. Published sources can usually be found here.● The Public Record Office – Located in Kew, set up by Act of Parliament in 1838, now the largest archive in the world, with over 80 miles of shelving.
31● County Record Offices – Since 1963 every county has been required to maintain a county record office which gathers together local records. Their collections extend beyond official documents to local businesses, estates and associations.● Local Studies Libraries – Hold mainly published material of local interest, including local newspapers (which can be very useful), official reports, and family history. They also hold the reports of local Medical Officers of Health (MOH’s), which are full of socially significant ‘data’.● University Archives – Hold various specialist collections.● Private Collections – Widely dispersed geographically and may be difficult to track down, but the Historical Manuscripts Commission has worked to compile a map of all private archives.
32Using Archives: Approaching Sources Key Questions for Historical Researchers:► Why was the source produced? For what reason was it written?A document is not a neutral ‘window on the past’ - the purpose for which it was produced will shape and influence everything it contains. The historical researcher must take account of this.► Why has the source survived? Why has it weathered the hazards of fire, flood, neglect and political upheaval?The reason for the survival of a document can tell the historical researcher a great deal about its significance, and about the society which produced it and kept it safe.
33Documents and Power■ The very fact of a document’s survival very often suggests it is a ‘document of power’ (i.e. that it has been produced by the powerful, or in the interests of the powerful, who have been able to ensure the document’s survival).Walter Benjamin – “All documents of civilization are documents of barbarism.”■ Documents (especially official documents) very often reflect the perspectives and worldviews of the dominant political and economic classes, rather than of ‘ordinary people’.■ The sociologically minded historical researcher must try to take account of this by adopting a critical approach to sources.
34Historical Methods:The skills of source-criticism
35Approaching the Sources In historical research the difficulty which confronts theresearcher is a special one:► How to deal with the sheer unmanageability of the massive array of documents.► How to deal with the ‘muteness’ of the sources - how to make them ‘speak’ to the research question.► Few research questions will be answerable in terms of what is directly communicated in the sources.There are 2 main ways of dealing with these problems:i) The Source-Oriented Approachii) The Problem-Oriented Approach
36The source-oriented approach: The researcher takes one primary source or group of primary sources which fall into the area of research interest (e.g. the records of a particular association, trade union, or court) and then searches for whatever is of value, allowing the content of the sources to determine the nature of the enquiry.The problem-oriented approach:After consulting secondary sources a specific research question is formulated. The relevant primary sources are then examined for their bearing on this specific question, with their relevance to other issues being put to one side. In this way the researcher proceeds as efficiently as possible to the point where they can some conclusions.
37Both approaches have strengths and weaknesses: i) The source-oriented approach► May yield an incoherent jumble of ‘data’.► Narrowing this down to a meaningful body of ‘evidence’ is impossible without the use of theoretical principles.► If the researcher has a set of theoretical assumptions then it might be better that these are made explicit.ii) With a problem-oriented approach,► It can be very difficult to tell in advance what sources are relevant to the specific research question.► The most improbable sources can prove illuminating, whilst the obvious ones can be disappointing.► This can mean ploughing through many sources which turn out to be of no use.
38Source-Criticism: Interpreting Documents Once the sources have been located and the approach decided upon the next step is to evaluate and interpret the documents:Principles of Source-Criticism:► There is always the danger of reading documents in terms of cultural assumptions rooted in the present.► Therefore sources must always be put in context, which can require further historical research (using secondary sources).► There is always the question of ‘bias’, i.e. the reason why the document was produced, the motives of the writer, and how this may have influenced its content.
39Source-Criticism: Beyond ‘Bias’ ► ‘Bias’ is misleading, because it suggests that wholly ‘neutral’ sources exist, and that a wholly ‘truthful’ account is possible.► Few historical researchers would now support this suggestion.“However spontaneous or authoritative the source, very few forms of writing arise solely from a desire to convey the unvarnished truth.” (Tosh 1991, p. 62)It is therefore better to assume that all sources are biased, and toacknowledge that the aim is not to find ‘non-biased’ sources, but tobe aware of the bias and take it into account in interpreting thedocument.► The bias may even prove to be useful historical ‘data’…
40‘Oblique’ Methods of Source-Criticism Sociological historical research is less likely to be concernedwith establishing ‘the facts’, and more concerned with whathistorical sources can tell us about the social life of a particularhistorical period, or what light they can shed on a specificsociological problem.Therefore, sociological history needs to go beyond traditionalempirical questions of ‘reliability’ and ‘bias’.It can do this by adopting ‘oblique methods’:1. Reading Sources ‘Against the Grain’.2. The Regressive Method
411. Reading Sources ‘Against the Grain’: Sources can be read for ‘traces’ of information that the author was noteven aware of setting down, and which was incidental to the purpose ofwriting (e.g. clues about attitudes, assumptions, mode of life, morality)“Historians alert to the unwitting testimony of the sources can go beyondthe intentions of those who created them.” (Tosh, 1991, p. 68)2. The ‘Regressive Method’:This method involves using what is known about a later period in orderto ‘work backwards’ and piece together aspects of an earlier period. It isoften used in cases where there is a lack of primary sources.► E.g. African history.The regressive method is of course always risky, but to some extent allhistorical research draws upon later periods in explaining earlier ones.This method can be very effective if carried out carefully.
42Narratives: The Oral History Tradition ■ Historical research based on oral evidence takes 2 main forms:i) ‘Oral Reminiscence’ – i.e. the first hand recollections ofpeople interviewed by a historical researcher.ii) ‘Oral Tradition’ – i.e. the narrative accounts of past eventswhich have been handed down by word of mouth through thegenerations.■ Both methods depend heavily upon memory, which is unreliable.■ For this reason, oral histories are most effective when they treatrecollections not simply as reports on the past, but as narrativesconstructed in the present.■ The nature of these narratives may then become the object ofsociological interest.
43● Especially working class life in the family and workplace. ● Oral history is particularly effective for research into the recent social history of everyday life (e.g. Oral History)● Especially working class life in the family and workplace.● Oral history can provide insight into the lives of people who would never have considered writing their experiences down.● In this way oral history can counter-balance the tendency of written documents to reflect the perspective of the powerful.“Ordinary people are offered not only a place in history, but arole in the production of historical knowledge, with importantpolitical implications” (Tosh, 1991, p. 212)
44Problems with Oral Evidence ► Oral testimony is not an objective window on the past. Memories are always filtered through subsequent experience. They will always be distorted by nostalgia, re-interpretation, etc.► Memory is unreliable, it is fundamental to historical research, but is also notoriously selective and unpredictable. It can often have more to do with the present than the past.► Social reality comprises much more than the sum of individual experiences. Therefore the social-historical researcher must grasp processes and structures which are over and above the experiences of individuals recounted through oral history.► The personal vividness of oral testimony can lead the historical researcher into too close an identification with the interviewees and their perspective on things.
45Final Points to Remember ■ Society is always changing, the social life of the present is continually emerging out of that of the past (re: Heraclitus). Therefore some sense of historical development is essential for sociological research.■ With the ‘cultural turn’ in the social sciences there has been a shift from macro-social history to micro-cultural history. This has involved new understandings of time and new ways of ‘doing time’ in social research.■ Even with the post-modern challenge to empirical history, the tradition of source-criticism based on careful scrutiny of primary sources is still at the core of historical research.■ Archive fieldwork requires a carefully planned approach in order to navigate through a large quantity of documents.