1. UNI Extensions for Diversity and Latency Support 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando1 Don FedykDonald.Fedyk@alcatel-lucent.comDonald.Fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com Dieter BellerDieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.comDieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com Lieven LevrauLieven.Levrau@alcatel-lucent.comLieven.Levrau@alcatel-lucent.com Daniele CeccerelliDaniele.Ceccarelli@ericsson.comDaniele.Ceccarelli@ericsson.com Fatai ZhangZhangFatai@huawei.comZhangFatai@huawei.com Yuji TochioTochio@jp.fujitsu.comTochio@jp.fujitsu.com draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions-01 IETF 86 – CCAMP WG

2. Agenda I-D history and brief overview Updates from 00 to 01 version Relationship with other CCAMP work Next steps 213-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando

3. I-D History and Brief Overview draft-fedyk-ccamp-l1vpn-extnd-overlay-01 became draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions-00 as per Vancouver meeting suggestion to broaden the applicability scope from GMPLS UNI for L1VPNs to the GMPLS UNI in general: – Title/I-D file name changed – Content aligned with new scope – Still applicable to the GMPLS UNI for a L1VPN following the overlay extension service model (L1VPN is a special case of the general UNI case) draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions-00 is still addressing: – UNI extensions for achieving diversity in the provider network – UNI extensions to deal with latency/latency variation (delay/ delay variation) constraints 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando3

4. Updates from 00 to 01 version Diversity part: – Error handling procedures added Latency part: – “Latency Signaling Extensions” section revised (new text added) Reference added and references updated 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando4

5. Relationship with other CCAMP work draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions-01 complements: – draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-01.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-01.txt – draft-ali-ccamp-extended-srlg-00.txt draft-ali-ccamp-extended-srlg-00.txt  these drafts address signaling extensions to support LSP diversity and SRLG for multi-provider domain networks draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions-01 differs from: – draft-beeram-ccamp-melg-00.txt draft-beeram-ccamp-melg-00.txt  draft describes routing actions on a virtual topology that has been provided to the CEs 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando5

6. Next Steps Solicit feedback/comments from the group Further refinement of dual-homing solution including more detailed signaling extensions Further refinement of latency section Collaboration with authors working on: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-00.txt 613-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando

7. Thank You! 713-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando

8. Backup Slides 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando8

9. Dual-homing Problem Statement PE 1 PPPE PE 2 PPPE CE LSP 1 LSP 2 Problem Statement: ensure that LSP1 and LSP2 are mutually disjoint 913-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando

10. Option 1: Exchange of SRLG List PE 1 PPPE PE 2 PPPE CE LSP 1 LSP 2 SRLG_IDs(LSP 1 ) SRLG_IDs(LSP 2 ) Exchange of SRLG ID list for disjoint LSPs via source CE node 1013-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando

11. Option 2: Exchange of Path Affinity Set PE 1 PPPE PE 2 PPPE CE LSP 1 LSP 2 PAS(LSP 1 ) Exchange of PAS + LSP ID via source CE node Dissemination of (PAS, LSP ID, SRLG IDs) among PEs for each L1VPN 1113-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando