1. InCommon Town Hall Meeting 19 October 2009

2. Town Hall Meeting When, in some obscure country town, the farmers come together to a special town-meeting, to express their opinion on some subject which is vexing the land, that, I think, is the true Congress, and the most respectable one that is ever assembled in the United States. - Henry David Thoreau

3. Today: Town Hall Meeting on Draft InCommon Future Plan and the interim 2010 Participation Tiers Thursday at 2pm ET / 11am PT: Town Hall Meeting on Technical Issues: Self-Signed Certificates for Metadata Entries; SAML2 capabilities; Shib 2.x migration and deployment strategies https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/xYCg https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/xYCg New Case Studies –http://www.incommonfederation.org/cases.htmlhttp://www.incommonfederation.org/cases.html –Lafayette Federates Ticketing Function with UniversityTicket –University of Washington, StudentsOnly Federate Enrollment Verification

4. STEERING COMMITTEEADVISORS Lois Brooks, Stanford University – Chair Steve Cawley, University of Minnesota Joel Cooper, Carleton College Clair Goldsmith, University of Texas System Ken Klingenstein, Internet2 (ex officio), University of Colorado Tracy Mitrano, Cornell University Kevin Morooney, Penn State Chris Shillum, Elsevier Jack Suess, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mike Teets, OCLC Renee Frost, Internet2, University of Michigan Rodney Petersen, EDUCAUSE (ex officio) David Wasley, retired, UCOP Role Manages the business and affairs of InCommon and its Federation, including oversight and recommendations on issues arising from the operation and management of the InCommon Federation.

5. RL "Bob" Morgan, University of Washington – Co-Chair Renee Shuey, Penn State – Co-Chair Tom Barton, University of Chicago Scott Cantor, The Ohio State University Steven Carmody, Brown University Paul Caskey, University of Texas System Michael Gettes, MIT Keith Hazelton, University of Wisconsin – Madison Ken Klingenstein, Internet2/InCommon Steering Committee Mike LaHaye, Internet2 David Walker, University of California-Davis David Wasley, retired, UCOP Role Provides recommendations relating to the operation and management of InCommon with respect to technical issues. 5

6. Growth Dates are plotted by execution of legal agreement 6 Adoption History 2004: 10 (pilot) 2005: 12 2006: 41 2007: 72 2008: 124 2009: 184 (October 5th)

7. Recent History for the “Future” Jan 2009: InCommon Future Group Formed, chartered by InCommon Steering, AMSAC, RACGroup March 2009: Future Group Meets in Oakland April 2009: Draft Report for Public CommentReport May 2009: Three Town Hall Forums for Comment July 2009: Board Report Issued: “InCommon Future Report and Recommendation” September 2009: –CIC and RUCC universities urge support of InCommon –Interim Financial Plan for Board Discussion –Internet2 Board: “… The Board is firmly committed to ensuring that InCommon is properly positioned to provide sustainable leadership in this field for the indefinite future... ” –Community Response: Increase Financial Support, Increase InCommon Annual Dues –Internet2’s Response: Increase Financial Support: Exec Director, Interim Business Plan December 2009: Final Business Plan due to Internet2 Board for Approval 7

8. InCommon Governance Continuing Internet2 commitment to the entire space Shared Governance Connections between Board, Councils, and Steering Committee 8

9. InCommon Three proposed divisions of the identity middleware ecosystem: 1.Leadership, Advocacy, Outreach 2.Foundation: Development and Research –Shib, Grouper, COmanage, Paccman, ISOC (DKIM), … 3.Trust Services –InCommon Federation (basic) –Bronze, Silver Profiles for Levels of Assurance of Identity –Certificate Services for U.S. Higher Education –Shib & IdM Training and Consulting –Outsourced Federation Services 9

10. Interim Tiers and Fees for 2010 Tier Approximation for InCommon Participants L1 – 69 (42%) L2 – 13 (8%) L3 – 37 (23%) L4 – 45 (27%) InCommon Classes HE – 117 3.6 million end users Partners – 48 NIH, NSF Labs, TeraGrid K12 School Pilot Marketplace of applications & services Community Feedback to Ground the development of Tiers, and Fee Structure for 2011 and Beyond 10

11. 2010 Tiers Approved by the Steering Committee, based on new Internet2 Levels: Carnegie Classification and Corporate Revenue 11 Very High ResearchL1$3,000 High ResearchL2$2,500 Doctoral, Large Masters, Medical Schools L3$1,500 All otherL4$1,100 Corporate: > $1B RevenueL1$3,000 Corporate: < $1B RevenueL3$1,500 Corporate: < $10M RevenueL4$1,100 Others: Case by Case, Similar Size Basis L1-4$ Additional Detail and Discussion on Webinar, 10/19/09 4:00pm ET