Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMorgan Castillo Modified over 3 years ago

1
Overview of Lecture Partitioning Evaluating the Null Hypothesis ANOVA Basic Ratios Sums of Squares Mean Squares Degrees of Freedom F-Ratio Evaluating the F-Ratio Analytical Comparisons

2
**Partitioning the Deviations**

AS 25 A 2 T - Within Subjects deviation Between Subjects

3
**Evaluating the Null Hypothesis**

If we consider the ratio of the between groups variability and the within groups variability Then we have

4
**Evaluating the Null Hypothesis**

If the null hypothesis is true then the treatment effect is equal to zero: If the null hypothesis is false then the treatment effect is greater than zero:

5
ANOVA Analysis of variance uses the ratio of two sources of variability to test the null hypothesis Between group variability estimates both experimental error and treatment effects Within subjects variability estimates experimental error

6
**From Deviations to Variances**

In order to evaluate the null hypothesis, it is necessary to transform the between group and within-group deviations into more useful quantities, namely, variances. For this reason the statistical analysis involving the comparison of variances reflecting different sources of variability is called the analysis of variance. For the purposes of analysis of variance a variance is defined as follows

7
**The Sums of Squares From the basic deviations**

A similar relationship holds for the sum of squares In other words

8
**IV: Lecturer, DV: Exam Score**

Example Data IV: Lecturer, DV: Exam Score

9
Basic Ratios: A Basic Ratio is defined as: The numerator term for any basic ratio involves two steps: the initial squaring of a set of quantities summing the squared quantities if more than one is present. The denominator term for each ratio is the number of items that contribute to the sum or score. Basic Ratios make the calculation of the sum of squares relatively simple

10
**The Notation for Basic Ratios**

To emphasise the critical nature of these basic ratios, we will use a distinctive symbol to designate basic ratios and to distinguish among them

11
**Calculating the Basic Ratios**

Starting with the basic score, AS, and substituting into the formula for basic ratios: The second basic ratio involves the sums of the treatment conditions. The final basic ratio we require involves the grand sum.

12
**Calculating the Sums of Squares**

The sums of squares can be calculated by combining these basic ratios. Total Sum of Squares Between Group Sum of Squares Within Group Sum of Squares

13
**Variance Estimates: Mean Squares**

The ratio we are interested in is the ratio of the between groups variability and the within groups variability In this context, the variability is defined by the equation. where SS refers to the component sums of squares and df represent the degrees of freedom associated with the SS.

14
Degrees of Freedom The degrees of freedom associated with a sum of squares correspond to the number of scores with independent information which enter into the calculation of the sum of squares. Degrees of freedom are the number of observations that are free to vary when we know something about those observations.

15
Degrees of Freedom The Between Group Degrees of Freedom The Within Group Degrees of Freedom The Total Degrees of Freedom

16
Mean Squares The Between Group Mean Square The Within Group Mean Square

17
The F-Ratio The F-Ratio is defined as

18
**The Anova Summary Table**

The results of the Anova are usually displayed by computers programs in a summary table:

19
**Testing the Null Hypothesis**

In order to decide whether or not the null hypothesis is rejected we need to find out what value of F is necessary to reject the null hypothesis. There is a simple rule for this. Reject H0 when Fobserved> Fcritical otherwise do not reject H0 We obtain a value for Fcritical by looking it up in the F tables.

20
The Critical F-Value To find the critical value Take the degrees of freedom for the effect (A) and look along the horizontal axis of the F table. Take the degrees of freedom for the error term (S/A) and look down the vertical axis of the F table. The place were the column for the degrees of freedom of the effect A meets the row for the degrees of freedom of the error (S/A) is the critical value of F. For these data Fcritical =3.89 so we can reject the null hypothesis

21
The Omnibus F The F-ratio includes information about all the levels of the independent variable that we have manipulated. The F-ratio for an overall difference between the means as reported in the ANOVA summary table is known as the Omnibus F-ratio. The best the Omnibus F-ratio can tell us is that there are differences between the means. It cannot tell us that what those differences are.

22
**Analytical Comparisons**

With a nonsignificant omnibus F we are prepared to assert that there are no observed differences among the means. We can stop the analysis there. A significant omnibus F demands further analysis of the data. Which differences between the means are real and which are not?

23
**Analytical Comparisons**

There are two basic approaches to solving the problem. Before we set out to collect the data, we could have made specific predictions about the direction of the effects In this case we can use a technique known as planned (a priori) comparisons. We might have designed an experiment where we couldn't be precise enough to say what the differences would be. In this case we use post hoc (after the event) comparisons.

24
**Planned (A Priori) Comparisons**

For example, assume the three levels of the independent variable are lecturer style: A1: Lectures with worksheets. A2: Lectures only. A3: No lectures, only worksheets. From previous research, we anticipate that A1 > A2, A1 > A3 (we are making no predictions about A2 vs A3). Does the data support this?

25
**Differences as the sum of weighted means**

Let us adopt the symbol y to represent the difference we are interested in: Y = mA1 – mA2 We can rewrite this as: Y = (1) mA1 +(–1) mA2 Including all the means in the experiment: Y = (1) mA1 +(–1) mA2 +(0) mA3

26
**Sum of Squares for a planned comparison**

Planned comparisons are based on the calculation of an F-ratio. This requires us to calculate the variability inherent in the comparison We calculate a sum of squares associated with the comparison. This is given by:

27
**Sum of Squares of a planned comparison**

The sum of squares of the comparison is given by

28
**Testing the planned comparison**

A F ratio is calculated to test the comparison. For this a mean square is required. The mean square for the comparison is calculated by: All planned comparisons have on 1 degree of freedom. The F-ratio is calculated by:

29
**Evaluating the planned comparison’s null hypothesis**

Critical F's for comparisons use the degrees of freedom for the numerator and the denominator of the F-ratio. There are 1 and 12 degrees of freedom for this comparison. Fcritical(1, 12) for p≤0.05=4.75 Given that Fobservedl=14.29, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that A1 (lectures with worksheets) leads to better scores than A2 (lectures only).

30
Next Week Post hoc comparisons Testing the assumptions that underlie ANOVA Two computer programs for analysing a one-way between groups analysis of variance

Similar presentations

OK

Overview of Lecture Factorial Designs Experimental Design Names

Overview of Lecture Factorial Designs Experimental Design Names

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on leverages definition Ppt on ocean currents Ppt on stock market crash Slideshare net download ppt on pollution Ppt on sugarcane industry Ppt on ic fabrication steps Ppt on credit policy college Free ppt on history of cricket Ppt on power generation by coal Ppt on power diode application