Download presentation

Published byConnor Harper Modified over 4 years ago

0
**fMRI design and analysis**

Basic designs

1
**MRI vs. fMRI Functional MRI (fMRI) studies brain function.**

MRI studies brain anatomy.

2
** neural activity blood oxygen fMRI signal**

MRI vs. fMRI MRI fMRI high resolution (1 mm) low resolution (~3 mm but can be better) one image … fMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal indirect measure of neural activity many images (e.g., every 2 sec for 5 mins) neural activity blood oxygen fMRI signal

3
**fMRI Activation Flickering Checkerboard Brain Activity Time **

OFF (60 s) - ON (60 s) -OFF (60 s) - ON (60 s) - OFF (60 s) Brain Activity Time Source: Kwong et al., 1992

4
**fMRI Experiment Stages: Prep**

1) Prepare subject Consent form Safety screening Instructions and practice trials if appropriate 2) Shimming putting body in magnetic field makes it non-uniform adjust 3 orthogonal weak magnets to make magnetic field as homogenous as possible 3) Sagittals Take images along the midline to use to plan slices Perhaps the most frequently misspelled word in fMRI: Should have one g, two t’s In this example, these are the functional slices we want: 12 slices x 6 mm

5
**fMRI Experiment Stages: Anatomicals**

4) Take anatomical (T1) images high-resolution images (e.g., 0.75 x 0.75 x 3.0 mm) 3D data: 3 spatial dimensions, sampled at one point in time 64 anatomical slices takes ~4 minutes 64 slices x 3 mm

6
**Slice Terminology VOXEL (Volumetric Pixel) IN-PLANE SLICE**

Slice Thickness e.g., 6 mm Number of Slices e.g., 10 SAGITTAL SLICE VOXEL (Volumetric Pixel) 3 mm 6 mm Matrix Size e.g., 64 x 64 In-plane resolution e.g., 192 mm / 64 = 3 mm IN-PLANE SLICE Field of View (FOV) e.g., 19.2 cm

7
**Coordinates - Anatomy 3 Common Views of Brain: Coronal (head on)**

sagittal coronal axial 3 Common Views of Brain: Coronal (head on) Axial (bird’s eye), aka Transverse. Sagittal (profile)

8
**fMRI Experiment Stages: Functionals**

5) Take functional (T2*) images images are indirectly related to neural activity usually low resolution images (3 x 3 x 6 mm) all slices at one time = a volume (sometimes also called an image) sample many volumes (time points) (e.g., 1 volume every 2 seconds for 136 volumes = 272 sec = 4:32) 4D data: 3 spatial, 1 temporal …

9
**Activation Statistics**

Functional images Time fMRI Signal (% change) ROI Time Course Condition ~2s Region of interest (ROI) Condition 1 Statistical Map superimposed on anatomical MRI image Condition 2 Time ... ~ 5 min

10
2D 3D

11
**Overview fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map Smoothing kernel**

General Linear Model Design matrix Motion correction Parameter Estimates Spatial normalisation Standard template

13
**Spatial Realignment: Reasons for Motion Correction**

Subjects will always move in the scanner The sensitivity of the analysis depends on the residual noise in the image series, so movement that is unrelated to the subject’s task will add to this noise and hence realignment will increase the sensitivity However, subject movement may also correlate with the task… …in which case realignment may reduce sensitivity (and it may not be possible to discount artefacts that owe to motion) Realignment (of same-modality images from same subject) involves two stages: 1. Registration - estimate the 6 parameters that describe the rigid body transformation between each image and a reference image 2. Reslicing - re-sample each image according to the determined transformation parameters

14
**Motion Correction Algorithms**

pitch roll yaw z translation y translation x translation Most algorithms assume a rigid body (i.e., that brain doesn’t deform with movement) Align each volume of the brain to a target volume using six parameters: three translations and three rotations Target volume: the functional volume that is closest in time to the anatomical image

15
Head Motion: Good, Bad,… Slide from Duke course

16
**… and catastrophically bad**

Slide from Duke course

17
2. Reslicing Nearest Neighbour Linear Application of registration parameters involves re-sampling the image to create new voxels by interpolation from existing voxels Interpolation can be nearest neighbour (0-order), tri-linear (1st-order), (windowed) fourier/sinc, or nth-order “b-splines” Full sinc (no alias) Windowed sinc

18
**Temporal Realignment (Slice-Timing Correction)**

Most functional MRI uses Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) Each plane (slice) is typically acquired every 3mm normally axial… … requiring ~32 slices to cover cortex (40 to cover cerebellum too) (actually consists of slice-thickness, eg 2mm, and interslice gap, eg 1mm, sometimes expressed in terms of “distance factor”) (slices can be acquired contiguously, eg [ ], or interleaved, eg [ ]) Each plane (slice) takes about ~60ms to acquire… …entailing a typical TR for whole volume of 2-3s Volumes normally acquired continuously (though sometimes gap so that TR>TA) 2-3s between sampling the BOLD response in the first slice and the last slice (a problem for transient neural activity; less so for sustained neural activity)

19
**Between Modality Co-registration**

Useful, for example, to display functional results (EPI) onto high resolution structural image (T1)… …indeed, necessary if spatial normalisation is determined by T1 image Because different modality images have different properties (e.g., relative intensity of gray/white matter), cannot simply minimise difference between images Therefore, use Mutual Information as cost function, rather than squared differences… EPI T2 T1 Transm PD PET

20
**DARTEL: Diffeomorphic Registration (SPM8)**

Grey matter average of 452 subjects Affine Grey matter average of 471 subjects DARTEL

21
**Coordinates - normalization**

Different people’s brains look different ‘Normalizing’ adjusts overall size and orientation Normalized Images Raw Images

22
Reasons for Smoothing Potentially increase signal to noise (matched filter theorem) Inter-subject averaging (allowing for residual differences after normalisation) Increase validity of statistics (more likely that errors distributed normally) Kernel defined in terms of FWHM (full width at half maximum) of filter - usually ~16-20mm (PET) or ~6-8mm (fMRI) of a Gaussian Ultimate smoothness is function of applied smoothing and intrinsic image smoothness (sometimes expressed as “resels” - RESolvable Elements) Gaussian smoothing kernel FWHM

23
**Overview fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map Smoothing kernel**

General Linear Model Design matrix Motion correction Parameter Estimates Spatial normalisation Standard template

25
**General Linear Model… Parametric statistics one sample t-test**

two sample t-test paired t-test Anova AnCova correlation linear regression multiple regression F-tests etc… all cases of the General Linear Model

26
**The General Linear Model**

T-tests, correlations and Fourier analysis work for simple designs and were common in the early days of imaging The General Linear Model (GLM) is now available in many software packages and tends to be the analysis of choice Why is the GLM so great? the GLM is an overarching tool that can do anything that the simpler tests do you can examine any combination of contrasts (e.g., intact - scrambled, scrambled - baseline) with one GLM rather than multiple correlations the GLM allows much greater flexibility for combining data within subjects and between subjects it also makes it much easier to counterbalance orders and discard bad sections of data the GLM allows you to model things that may account for variability in the data even though they aren’t interesting in and of themselves (e.g., head motion) as we will see later in the course, the GLM also allows you to use more complex designs (e.g., factorial designs)

27
**Equation for single (and all) voxels: **

General Linear Model Equation for single (and all) voxels: yj = xj1 b1 + … xjL bL + ej ej ~ N(0,s2) yj : data for scan, j = 1…J xjl : explanatory variables / covariates / regressors, l = 1…L bl : parameters / regression slopes / fixed effects ej : residual errors, independent & identically distributed (“iid”) (Gaussian, mean of zero and standard deviation of σ) Equivalent matrix form: y = Xb + e X : “design matrix” / model

28
**Matrix Formulation Equation for scan j Simultaneous equations for**

scans 1.. J …that can be solved for parameters b1.. L Regressors Scans

29
**A Simple Experiment TIME Blank Screen Intact Objects Scrambled Objects**

Lateral Occipital Complex responds when subject views objects Blank Screen Intact Objects Scrambled Objects TIME One volume (12 slices) every 2 seconds for 272 seconds (4 minutes, 32 seconds) Condition changes every 16 seconds (8 volumes)

30
What’s real? A. C. B. D.

31
What’s real? I created each of those time courses based by taking the predictor function and adding a variable amount of random noise signal = + noise

32
Linear Drift Huettel, Song & McCarthy, 2004, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

33
**Physiological Noise Respiration every 4-10 sec (0.3 Hz)**

moving chest distorts susceptibility Cardiac Cycle every ~1 sec (0.9 Hz) pulsing motion, blood changes Solutions gating avoiding paradigms at those frequencies

34
**Low and High Frequency Noise**

Source: Smith chapter in Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods

35
**We create a GLM with 2 predictors**

× 1 = + + × 2 = fMRI Signal Design Matrix x Betas + Residuals “what we CAN explain” “how much of it we CAN explain” “what we CANNOT explain” = “our data” x + Statistical significance is basically a ratio of explained to unexplained variance

36
**Implementation of GLM in SPM**

Intact Predictor Scrambled Predictor Many thanks to Øystein Bech Gadmar for creating this figure in SPM Time SPM represents time as going down SPM represents predictors within the design matrix as grayscale plots (where black = low, white = high) over time SPM includes a constant to take care of the average activation level throughout each run

37
Contrasts in the GLM We can examine whether a single predictor is significant (compared to the baseline) We can also examine whether a single predictor is significantly greater than another predictor

Similar presentations

OK

A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body by P.E. Downing, Y. Jiang, M. Shuman, N.Kanwisher presented by Ilya Levner.

A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body by P.E. Downing, Y. Jiang, M. Shuman, N.Kanwisher presented by Ilya Levner.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google