1. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Update on Sequestration Impacts Kelvin K. Droegemeier Vice President for Research University of Oklahoma Norman Campus Faculty Senate Monday, 6 May 2013

2. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Federal R&D Budget

3. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Federal R&D Budget

4. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Federal R&D Budget

5. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Federal Budget

6. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Funding Burden on Universities What’s Driving the Increase? Unfunded Compliance Mandates Unrecovered Indirect Costs ($4.7B in FY 2010) Mandated Cost Sharing (even if IDC is reduced or not paid at all) Institutional Investments (buildings, equipment, facilities) What’s Driving the Increase? Unfunded Compliance Mandates Unrecovered Indirect Costs ($4.7B in FY 2010) Mandated Cost Sharing (even if IDC is reduced or not paid at all) Institutional Investments (buildings, equipment, facilities)

7. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Federal R&D Budget

8. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSASequestration Cuts are from Projected Spending

9. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSASequestration Cuts are from Projected Spending

10. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSASequestration Cuts are from Projected Spending

11. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA The Federal R&D Budget Sequestration 7.8% 5.0%

12. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Impact of Sequestration

13. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Impact of Sequestration

14. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Norman Campus Research Expenditures by Source (FY12)

15. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Federal Research is Growing and Diversifying 15

16. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Federal Research is Growing and Diversifying

17. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA 2 memos (Oct, 2012 and March, 2013) sent campus-wide to educate, set principles and manage expectations For FY 2013  Originally projected a possible expenditure decrease of $1.3M to 2.5M  We’ve seen virtually no impacts to date, but agencies are only now submitting their spending plans to OMB and Congress  By the end of Federal FY13, Norman Campus may see loss of $1+M For FY 2014  Expenditure decrease of $5.5M to 10.0M [possibly impacting 50 non-faculty researchers (18%) and 50 graduate students (8%)]  Considerable uncertainty regarding agency strategies and Congressional action, but latest discussions suggest sequestration may be ended Research agencies enjoy bi-partisan support and are being given flexibility in handling cuts – and may be protected from future reductions Potential Sequestration Impacts on the Norman Campus 17

18. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Two years ago we began diversifying our research portfolio (Defense, Security, Intelligence, Private Sector, Climate) Continue recruiting top talent (Moore, Luce, radar cluster, social science cluster) Major State-wide push in UAVs (lot of protected Federal $$) Continue to invest strategically (radar, weather, medical imaging, genomics) 3 years ago we created a center to help faculty develop more competitive teams and proposals (new awards of more than $150M and many more large projects in the pipeline) Expanding Federal agency presence on the Research Campus Major initiatives in STEM education and undergraduate research (considerable Federal funding) How the Norman Campus “Prepared” 18

19. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Research: President’s 2014 Budget

20. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Via collaboration and leveraging Should be but often isn’t in the academic culture NSF is a wonderful example (e.g., Global Research Council, I-CORPS, OneNSF, INSPIRE, CREATIV), including considerable new emphasis on international activities Regional initiatives, university consortia Intra-state collaboration (OneOklahoma concept) – reduce redundancy and contain costs Engagement of the social/behavioral/economic sciences Faculty must see themselves as more than individual entrepreneurs How Do We Remain at the Cutting Edge in Research? 20

21. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA By adding to the undergraduate experience an opportunity for authentic, original scholarship Modern STEM pedagogy (engaged learning) Undergraduate scholarship in many forms – all disciplines Will take significant changes by faculty + rewards/incentives Will see significant Federal funding for STEM and work related to it (i.e., authentic research) By De-investing in or shutting down facilities and partnering with other institutions to reduce duplication This isn’t something we do well at the national level 21 How Do We Remain at the Cutting Edge in Research?

22. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA By building more (and more effective) linkages with private industry and applied R&D agencies Key to innovation and wealth creation Key to economic diversification in states Important for workforce development Pesky IP issues and historical views of universities as difficult to work with must be addressed Universities weren’t structured to do this (philosophically or administratively) but are improving! 22 How Do We Remain at the Cutting Edge in Research?

23. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA By providing resources to help faculty think long term about and develop their research programs and competitive grant proposals – or “Research Program Development” Not an inherent skill among all faculty Universities have lots of resources for students – need to not forget faculty! Alignments with national initiatives and priorities (more applied R&D, industry partnerships vis-à-vis I-CORPS and other programs) Becoming involved in fixing key national policies (e.g., F&A recovery, cost sharing) Showing that we understand and are willing to help with big- picture issues (debt and deficit), as APLU, AAU and COGR are doing 23 How Do We Remain at the Cutting Edge in Research?

24. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Higher education is too expensive/student debt too high Time to graduation is too long Reductions in state appropriations are unsustainable Our teaching methods are ineffective – students are retaining too little and public confidence has eroded We’re not moving quickly enough to embrace technology Employers are not happy with the product Get a degree – get a job (not the sole role of univs) If We Only Realized Then What We Realize Now... 24

25. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA If We Only Realized Then What We Realize Now... 25 And then came the MOOC revolution -- a financial model that calls into question the fundamental structure and value of place- based education and research universities. How might we have been better prepared???

26. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Agency budgets: Is “flat” the new normal? Lots of money “locked up” in the private sector – universities are not structured to work effectively with companies Federal compliance burdens are choking productivity The perceived value proposition of basic research is weakening The cost of research is high & increasing + resources are duplicated Graduate students for research Few, expensive, largely externally funded. Undergraduate students for research Plentiful, inexpensive, largely “self”-funded, with tuition partly reflecting institutional research activity “Smaller” institutions need each other and supply faculty to the “larger” institutions, which can stand alone or cluster to drive SIGNIFICANT change Is There a Lesson Going Forward? 26

27. Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Is There a Lesson Going Forward? 27 What revolution might fundamentally transform the conduct of academic research, and how can we anticipate or even create it?? How does compliance figure into this picture?