1. A Technology Vision for the Future Rick Summerhill, Chief Technology Officer, Eric Boyd, Deputy Technology Officer, Internet2 Joint Techs Meeting 16 July 2007 FERMI Lab, IL

2. 2 We Need a Vision for the Future Over the past 3-4 years, our community has been focused on politics and costs - in particular tactical issues that beg for a long term direction for technology in the R&E community! In the past, our community has provided strong leadership, but, of late, has focused on existing services. We need to do more! And recalling history of previous projects and the evolution of IP is important to understand It is time for our community to provide strong leadership and direction

3. 3 Important Ideas There are two fundamental ideas to understand The most important role we can play is innovation - you are the RONS, universities, and corporations interested in doing new things ! A vision for the future - in 5 years, networking will have changed drastically, and in 10 years, it will be unrecognizable! We need to focus on the future!

4. 4 Community Assets and Infrastructure Our community now has available layer 0 through layer 3 services - and at the national, regional, and campus levels It has obtained incredible resources and infrastructure making new services and capabilities available to the community At the National Level, for example, Internet2 now has full control of waves, both SONET and Ethernet capabilities, and an IP network.

5. 5

6. 6

7. 7

8. 8

9. 9

10. 10 Need for Innovation and Direction! We need to create innovative ways to utilize the infrastructure and provide new services! We need a carefully thought out technology direction! From a community engineering point of view From a network research point of view Moreover, it’s not just the network, but a systems approach to the complete Cyberinfrastructure Note that others in the international R&E community, including partnerships with networks like ESnet, are working very hard at this! Moreover, corporate enterprises and standard’s bodies are closely watching what we do in this space.

11. 11 Systems Approach There are many components to this approach Creating new network paradigms With the appropriate middleware components that can support those network paradigms as well as applications at higher layers in the stack With the appropriate performance monitoring and diagnostics systems, again at all layers of the stack With the appropriate security mechanisms at all layers A Systems approach to CyberInfrastructure

12. 12 Technology Vision Over the next several months, create a technology vision Provide direction for the future Will be a living document that will insure innovative use of future developments Make clear what we do, and also what we don’t do Make clear which elements of the community do which pieces, and how partnerships collaborate! Essential in this dialog is community input and advice in creating that vision! We look to the councils and committees like the NTAC for input!

13. 13 Are you ready for LHC?

14. 14 CERN Tier 0Raw Data FNAL BNL Shared Data Storage and Reduction Tier 1 (12 orgs) US Tier 2 (15 orgs) CMS (7) Atlas (6-7) US Tier 3 (68 orgs) US Tier 4 (1500 US scientists) Scientists Request Data Provides Data to Tier 3 Scientists Analyze Data LHCOPN GEANT-ESNet-Internet2 Internet2/Connectors Local Infrastructure 14

15. 15 CERN Tier 0 to Tier1: Requires 10-40 Gbps Tier 1 to Tier 2: Requires 10-20 Gbps LHCOPN GEANT-ESNet-Internet2 Internet2/Connectors Tier 1 or 2 to Tier 3: Estimate: Requires 1.6 Gbps per transfer (2 TB's in 3 hours) Peak Flow Network Requirements Local Infrastructure 15

16. 16 What are the Implications for Normal Network Operations from T2 to T3? Example: 13 people (3 Professors and 10 Graduate Students) require ten 3-hour timeslots a month to receive 8 Gigabit data flows. 16 4 Gig 10 Gig

17. 17 CMS T2 Traffic at UNL

18. 18 Internet2 Connectors 18 MAGPI 3ROX CalREN-2 South Great Plains Network Indiana GigaPoP MREN Merit LONI Internet2 ESnet NoX NYSERNet OARnet OmniPoP SoX Oregon GigaPoP Pacific Northwest GigaPoP

19. 19 Nine Universities Connect through CalREN-2 South 19 University of Arizona (T3) UC Irvine (T3) UC Santa Cruz (T3) UC Davis (T2) UCLA (T3) UC Riverside (T3) UC San Diego(T3) UC Santa Barbara (T3) California Institute of Technology (T2) CENIC

20. 20 The Network is the Backplane for the Distributed CI Computer Instrumentation Security Control Data Generation Computation Analysis Simulation Program Security Management Security and Access Authentication Access Control Authorization Researcher Control Program Viewing Security 3D Imaging Display and Visualization. Display Tools Security Data Input Collab Tools Publishing Human Support Help Desk Policy and Funding Resource Providers Funding Agencies Campuses Search Data Sets Storage Security Retrieval Input Schema Metadata Data Directories Ontologies Archive Education And Outreach Network Training

21. 21 The Network is the Backplane for the Distributed CI Computer Instrumentation Security Control Data Generation Computation Analysis Simulation Program Security Management Security and Access Authentication Access Control Authorization Researcher Control Program Viewing Security 3D Imaging Display and Visualization. Display Tools Security Data Input Collab Tools Publishing Human Support Help Desk Policy and Funding Resource Providers Funding Agencies Campuses Search Data Sets Storage Security Retrieval Input Schema Metadata Data Directories Ontologies Archive Education And Outreach Network Training

22. 22 Cyberinfrastructure Requirements Data storage Robust campus infrastructure Security and Authorization IT support for local and remote resources Network Performance monitoring tools 22

23. 23 Cyberinfrastructure View of the Network CI Network Internet2

24. 24 Cyberinfrastructure Components Network MiddlewarePerformance Infrastructure / Tools Control Plane …. Bulk Transport 2-Way Interactive Video Real-Time Communications Applications Applications call on Network Cyberinfrastructure …. Phoebus Network Cyberinfrastructure

25. 25 Questions? rrsum@internet2.edu