2The First Constitutional Amendments: The Bill of Rights 1787 – Most state constitutions explicitly protected a variety of personal libertiesSpeech, religion, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, trial by juryNew Constitution shifted power to the national governmentWould the national government uphold these liberties?Anti-Federalists voiced this concern
3The First Constitutional Amendments: The Bill of Rights Bill of Rights addition defeated unanimously at the federal conventionFederalists argued that a bill of right was unnecessary.Already included by statesFoolhardy to list things that the national government had NO power to doSome Federalists supported the idea; Jefferson for exampleJames Madison did not until politics intervenedHe sought House seat in a district that was largely Anti-Federalist in nature.Made good on his promise
4The First Constitutional Amendments: The Bill of Rights 1789 Congress sent proposed Bill of Rights to the states for ratification, which occurred in 1791The first ten amendments to the Constitution contain numerous specific guaranteesFree speech, press and religionHighlight Anti-Federalist fearsNinth Amendment“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”Tenth AmendmentReiterates that powers not delegated to the national government are reserved to the states or to the people.
5The Incorporation Doctrine: The Bill of Rights Made Applicable to the States Bill of Rights intended to limit powers of the national governmentBarron v. Baltimore (1833)Court ruled that the national Bill of Rights limited only the actions of the U.S. government and not those of the states.But decision suggested the possibility that some or all of the protections might be interpreted to prevent state infringement of those rights.
6The Incorporation Doctrine: The Bill of Rights Made Applicable to the States 14th AmendmentDue process clauseOver the years this clause has been construed to guarantee to individuals a variety of rightsEconomic liberty to criminal procedural rights and protection from arbitrary governmental actionSubstantive due processJudicial interpretation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ due process clause that protects citizens from arbitrary or unjust laws
7The Incorporation Doctrine: The Bill of Rights Made Applicable to the States An interpretation of the Constitution that holds that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that state and local governments also guarantee those rights.Gitlow v. New York (1925)Near v. Minnesota (1931)Selective IncorporationA judicial doctrine whereby most but not all of the protections found in the Bill of Rights are made applicable to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.Palko v. Connecticut (1937)Fundamental FreedomsThose right defined by the Court to be essential to order, liberty and justice.
9First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Religion Framers did not support a national church or religion.Article VIProvides that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or Public Trust under the United States.”First AmendmentPart of the Bill of Rights that imposes a number of restrictions on the federal government with respect to the civil liberties of the people, including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.
10First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Religion Establishment ClauseThe first clause in the First AmendmentProhibits the national government from establishing a national religionEngel v. Vitale (1962)Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971_The Lemon TestAgnostini v. Felton (1997)Zelman v Simmons-Harris (2002)
11First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Religion Free Exercise ClauseThe second clause of the First AmendmentProhibits the U.S. government from interfering with a citizen’s right to practice his or her religion
12First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Speech and Press Democracy depends on a free exchange of ideas.Volatile area of constitutional interpretationAlien and Sedition ActsPrior restraint: Constitutional doctrine that prevents the government from prohibiting speech or publication before the fact; generally held to be in violation of the First Amendment
13First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Speech and Press Civil WarLincoln suspended the free press provision of the First AmendmentOrdered the arrest of the editors of two New York papers who were critical of himNewspaper editor jailed by a military court without having any charges brought against him.Appealed to the Supreme Court.Congress enacted legislation prohibiting the Court from issuing a judgment in any cases involving convictions for publishing statements critical of the U.S.Article II gives Congress power to determine the jurisdiction of the Court.
14First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Speech and Press WWIAnti-governmental speechClear and Present Danger TestTest articulated by the Supreme Court in Schenck v. U.S. (1919) to draw the line between protected and unprotected speech.The Court looks to see “whether the words used” could “create a clear and present danger that they will bring about substantive evils” that Congress seeks “to prevent.”Anti-war leaflets okay during peace, but not permissible during war – too dangerous.But what constituted a danger?Direct Incitement TestA test articulated by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) that holds that advocacy of illegal action is protected by the First Amendment unless imminent lawless action is intended and likely to occur.
15First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Speech and Press Protected Speech and PublicationsPrior RestraintCourt has made it clear that it will not tolerate prior restraint of speechNew York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1971)Pentagon Papers caseSupreme Court ruled that the U.S. government could not block the publication of secret Department of Defense documents illegally furnished to the Times by anti-war activists.Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976)Court ruled in favor of press’s right to cover trial.
16First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Speech and Press Symbolic SpeechSymbols, signs, and other methods of expression generally also considered to be protected by the First AmendmentStromberg v. California (1931)Upheld flying of red flag (symbol of opposition to U.S. government)Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community District School (1969)Court upheld wearing of black armbands as protest against Viet Nam War
17Some have created free speech zones First Amendment Guarantees: Hate Speech, Unpopular Speech, Speech ZonesTwo-thirds of colleges and universities have banned a variety of forms of speech or conduct that creates or fosters an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment on campus.Some have created free speech zonesThese restrict the time, place or manner of speech.Implication that speech can be limited on other parts of campus.
18The Rights of Criminal Defendants Due process rightsProcedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments for those accused of crimes.Warren Court made several provisions of the Bill of Rights dealing with the liberties of criminal defendants (those charged but not yet tried) applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
19Fourth Amendment“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
20Fourth AmendmentOver the years, the Court has interpreted the Fourth Amendment to allow the police to search:The person arrestedThings in plain view of the accused personPlaces or things that the arrested person could also touch or reach or are otherwise in the arrestee’s immediate control.Court has ruled that police must knock and announce their presence before entering a home or apartment to execute a search.2001 ruling on thermal imaging drug evidence (without a warrant) was violation of Fourth Amendment.Drug testing difficult search and seizure issue.Chandler v. Miller (1997)
21Fifth AmendmentImposes a number of restrictions on the federal government with respect to the rights of persons suspected of committing a crime.Miranda v. Arizona (1966)Miranda rightsProvides for indictment by a grand jury and protection against self-incrimination.Prevents the national government from denying a person life, liberty, or property without the due process of law.It also prevents the national government from taking property without fair compensation.
22Fourth and Fifth Amendments and the Exclusionary Rule Judicially created rule that prohibits policy from using illegally seized evidence at trial.Weeks v. U.S. (1914)Court reasoned that allowing police and prosecutors to use a tainted search would only encourage that activity.Mapp v. Ohio (1961)Warren Court ruled that “all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution, is inadmissible in a state court.”
23Sixth Amendment and the Right to Counsel Sets out the basic requirements of procedural due process for federal courts to follow in criminal trials.These include speedy and public trials, impartial juries, trials in the state where the crime was committed, notice of the charges, the right to confront and obtain favorable witnesses, and the right to counsel.Gideon v. Wainwright (1936)
24The Sixth Amendment and Jury Trials Provides that a person accused of a crime shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury.It also provides defendants the right to confront witnesses against them.Supreme Court has held that jury trials must be available if a prison sentence of six or more months is possible.Impartiality of juryBoston v. Kentucky (1986)Right to confront witnessesMaryland v. Craig (1990)
25The Eighth Amendment and Cruel and Unusual Punishment Part of the Bill of Rights that states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted”Furman v. Georgia (1972)Court ended capital punishmentImposed in an arbitrary mannerGregg v. Georgia (1976)Reaction to rewriting of state laws on death penalty.Death penalty statute found to be constitutionalMcClesky cases (1987 and 1991)
26Right to Privacy The right to be let alone. A judicially created doctrine encompassing an individual’s decision to use birth control to secure an abortion.Birth ControlGriswold v. Connecticut (1965AbortionRoe v. Wade (1973)Court found a woman’s right to an abortion was protected by the right to privacy that could be implied from specific guarantees found in the Bill of Rights applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989)Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992)Stenberg v. Carhart (2000)HomosexualityLawrence v. Texas (2003)State sodomy laws found unconstitutional.
27The Right to Die1990 Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that parents could not withdraw a feeding tube from their comatose daughter after her doctors testified that she could live for many more years if the tube remained in place.Rehnquist rejected any attempts to expand the right to privacy in to this area.
28The Right to DieCourt did note that individuals could terminate medical treatment if they were able to express, or had done so in writing via a living will, their desire to have medical treatment terminated in the event they became incompetent.1997 Court ruled unanimously that terminally ill persons do NOT have a constitutional right to physician assisted suicide.Oregon voters approved a right to die law in 2001.Attorney General issued legal opinion that this was not acceptable.State and national conflict.Federal judge ruled that Ashcroft, then Attorney General, had overstepped his authority.