Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The value of geodata in economic development 1. Introduction Many countries with weak economies are potentially rich in natural resources but lack the.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The value of geodata in economic development 1. Introduction Many countries with weak economies are potentially rich in natural resources but lack the."— Presentation transcript:

1 The value of geodata in economic development 1

2 Introduction Many countries with weak economies are potentially rich in natural resources but lack the ability to attract the inward investment to effectively develop this sector. Principal factors needed to stimulate resource exploitation: geological information (“geodata”) stable and responsible governance legal systems and good infrastructure (human and physical capital such as ports and railroads) 2

3 MINE Pre-competitive - geoscience infrastructure [data, systems, expertise etc] Grassroots Advanced Brownfields Geological Survey Junior exploration Company Major mining house Exploration department of operating mine AREA 3 Geoscience Public Information (GPI) is the start of the extractive industry value chain

4 Typical geodata investment / return profile Years >>>>>> Data released 4

5 Exploration targets Priority areas Prospective terrain Investment promotion Investment promotion Pre competitive public geoscience data feasible deposit Time >>> Mining Industry / private sector Geol Survey / public sector (developing economies) Geol. Survey (US, Can, Aus) Mining Industry / private sector Oil Ministry Oil and Gas Companies / private sector 5 The “hand-over” point from public to private varies by sector and location

6 The type and quality of geodata, their density of coverage, ease of accessibility and price are all critically important in the process. This is because:- costs are a function of the quality, quantity and type of data collected; certain types of geodata are more relevant for the discovery or evaluation of particular commodities and therefore may vary by geological province; some areas may be explored by the private sector giving the state the opportunity of leveraging on those investments; the type and level of coverage required may vary depending on its intended use; and geodata that are not well maintained and easily made available in suitable formats and at a reasonable price have limited efficacy. 6

7 approx. $/km 2 from recent World Bank and other contracts excluding capacity building and data management Prioritisation against cost-benefit Cost 7

8 Rank order Type of geodata 1 Regional / country-wide processed airborne geophysical data (mag, radiometric, e-m) at ~400m line spacing or closer 2Regional scale mineral occurrence maps 3 Geological maps in vector digital (suitable for a GIS) covering most or all the country at a scale of 1:200,000 or larger 4Topographic data / maps 5Supporting reports / memoirs / published papers 6 Geological maps (copies or scans of printed maps) covering most or all the country at a scale of 1:200,000 or larger 7Cadastral maps / data 8Mineral prospectivity summary brochures / booklets 9Interpretations of airborne geophysical survey data 10Regional scale metallogenic maps 11Regional scale tectonic maps 12Regional scale geochemical survey results at density of ~1 sample per 10 sq km 12Interpreted satellite imagery 14Hydrogeological maps 15 Geological maps (copies or scans of printed maps) covering most or all the country at a scale of 1:1million or smaller 16Geological maps in vector digital (suitable for a GIS) covering most or all the country at a scale of 1:1m or smaller 8 Types of (GPI) geodata required by the extractive industry (from questionnaire results)

9 Existing geodata:- There is considerable variation between countries in terms of the types, quality and resolutions of which data exist. In the majority of cases it is difficult and time consuming to discover which data exist and how to make contact with their custodians. That many of the indicators of data availability or access paths that are shown on public websites are out of date or unavailable. Many data are still located in the archives of Africa’s former colonial countries, principally at BGS, BRGM and the Musée royal de l'Afrique centrale, Tervuren, and that for various reasons, these are generally only made available for inspection on personal visit. Many of the most easily available sources of information are of low resolution and difficult to use, such as the “pdf” images on the EU-ACP web site 9

10 Maps showing the currently known major metallogenic zones and petroleum basins of Africa 10

11 5 2 1 3 4 11 Map suggesting priority areas for new or improved GPI based on the geological belts and provinces (mineral prospectivity) against current paucity of geodata

12 Weak institutional base GSO collector, keeper and disseminator of GPI Poorly paid civil service staff Better staff leave for private sector Reduced functionality 12 Problems with warehousing and dissemination of geodata in geological survey organisations (GSOs) – the cycle of decline

13 Solutions to these problems NGO funded capacity building programmes should require geodata to be web enabled and include financial provision for post-project sustainability Economies of scale and efficiency from multinational approach Retain key GSO staff through as parastatals or public- private partnership to enable market-rate salaries (… funded by) revenue from internet sales of value added geodata (freemium model) 13

14 New geodata  Five zones priority areas for the next stage investments in geodata acquisition.  Geodata to comprise small scale compilations and re-interpretations of existing information followed by large scale geological maps and high resolution airborne geophysical magnetic and radiometric surveys, for early stage mineral exploration (or magnetic and gravity for oil and gas exploration).  New geodata to be produced in digital, open format suitable for further interpretation by the companies. Heterogeneity and adherence to standards is less important than the data being released without delay.  As a condition of the development loan or grant, all new geodata should be web enabled and freely available to everybody – at minimal charge commensurate with covering the costs of dissemination.  A business model to be established whereby the long term costs of data maintenance and dissemination may be sustained, post-project.  New projects to focus on relevant geodata acquisition and management using minimal expatriate expertise to build local skills. Trans-national regional approaches to knowledge and skills pooling should be encouraged and facilitated. Wider stakeholder involvement in project design so that private sector interests are incorporated. 14

15 Existing geodata  Large scale holders of African geodata such as the BGS, BRGM and MRAC should be encouraged to scan and make freely available on their web sites, and elsewhere, as much as possible of their relevant geodata assets, addressing issues of copyright in pragmatic ways. Priority should be given to scanning and making available existing data “as is” without waiting for agreements on standards, inter- operability etc.  Negotiations should begin with African countries, at Ministry levels, with a view to those countries scanning and making freely available for web access existing geodata, including but not limited to maps, open-file reports, borehole logs, geochemistry and geophysical surveys. A business model should be developed to compensate countries for any minor loss of income from current sales of data and financial assistance sought to fund the costs of scanning.  Where geodata have been lost, every effort should be made to recover them, at cost if necessary, from archived copies that may be held by the original contractors or consultants involved. 15


Download ppt "The value of geodata in economic development 1. Introduction Many countries with weak economies are potentially rich in natural resources but lack the."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google