Please hold questions until the end of all presentations.
Meeting Agenda n 8:30-8:40 –Welcome n 8:40-8:55 – Short Term Special Events, General Liability n 8:55-9:10 – Review of SORM 200 Data n 9:10-9:40 –Claims n 9:40-10:00– Trend Analysis & Accident Investigation
Meeting Agenda n 10:00-10:15 – Break n 10:15-11:00 – Life Safety Code 101, 2003 Update n 11:00-11:15 – SORM Fraud Team n 11:15-11:30 – Loss, Damage, & Destroyed Property n 11:30-12:00 – Questions & Comments
Short Term Special Events, General Liability Steven E. Haynes, ARM GRS Insurance Services, LLC
State Office of Risk Management Master Short Term General Liability Insurance Program n Background and Purpose n Key Elements of Program Outside Users of State Owned FacilitiesOutside Users of State Owned Facilities State Employees Using Third Party FacilitiesState Employees Using Third Party Facilities n Program Highlights Types of Events AvailableTypes of Events Available Underwriting GuidelinesUnderwriting Guidelines Coverages, Limits, and PricingCoverages, Limits, and Pricing
Application Process Application Process Key Contacts Key Contacts Marketing Material Marketing Material Summary and Questions Summary and Questions
SORM 200 Loss Data Summary Sally Becker CPCU ARM
History n Annual Report to SORM n FY02 – change in data collected –Loss type –Loss cause –Retain from year to year –Update previously entered data n February, 2003 – availability to enter all year long
Data – FY02 vs. FY03 OverallFY02FY03 Change % No. of Losses 1636183912% Open823852 Closed813987 Amt. Pd. 5,665,1205,193,833-8% Res/Dmds615,379,6531,048,355,943 Lawsuits759636-16%
Data by Date of Loss # Losses PaidResr./Demands FY98711,320,193106,458,574 FY99115743,6203,142,602 FY003152,545,92156,609,046 FY016193,011,97473,565,875 FY0212461,603,445542,820,186 FY0310751,354,722880,839,313 Total:344110,579,8751,663,435,596
Accident Causation Theories There are a variety of theories on accident causation that can be grouped into the following categories: Domino Theories which view accidents in three phases: pre-contact, contact and post-contact. Multiple Causation Theories which view causes based on a variety of factors such as man, machine and the environment. Psychological/Behavioral Causation Theories which focus on human behavior as the major cause of accidents Energy Related Causation Theories which view accidents as a result of energy that is out of control.
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS n SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM SOLVING METHODS –Fault Tree Analysis –http://reliability.sandia.gov/Reliability/Fault _Tree_Analysis/fault_tree_analysis.html http://reliability.sandia.gov/Reliability/Fault _Tree_Analysis/fault_tree_analysis.htmlhttp://reliability.sandia.gov/Reliability/Fault _Tree_Analysis/fault_tree_analysis.html –Fish Bone Diagram –http://www.pathmaker.com/resources/tool s/cause.asp http://www.pathmaker.com/resources/tool s/cause.asphttp://www.pathmaker.com/resources/tool s/cause.asp
TREND ANALYSIS n IDENTIFY BASIC FACTS n SHOW POSSIBLE PATTERNS/TRENDS n ESTABLISH PRIORITIES FOR SAFETY ACTIVITIES
ASWG CODES Effective June 1, 1997 the Commission adopted revised Advisory Statistical Work Group (ASWG) codes for Nature of Injury, Part of Body, and Cause of Injury. These code changes aligned the Commission's reporting requirements with the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions (IAIABC) Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) reporting standards. The ASWG codes are available to EDI participants through the IAIABC. If a carrier or trading partner has previously purchased an IAIABC Implementation Guide, the IAIABC will provide a list of all the ASWG codes as an update to the Guide. If you are interested in purchasing an Implementation Guide, you can contact the IAIABC directly at 1201 Wakarusa Drive C-3, Lawrence, Kansas, 66049 or by phone (785) 840-9103. The IAIABC has also made the codes available via their website at www.iaiabc.org. Once you have reached their web page, choose the EDI folder and available options will be listed.
Examples of categories to include in the analysis should at least be the following: A. Department: B. Job Title: C. Agent Involved: (ironing press, material cutter, fabric rolls, sewing machine, and clothing bundles) D. Experience: (1-5 years, 6-10 years, etc.) E. Body Part: (hand/fingers, back, leg, head/neck, arm and foot) F. Accident Type:(caught between, struck-by, struck-against, lift/lower, push/pull, etc.)
CAUSE OF INJURY – FY 01 & FY 00 As of August 31, 2001
CAUSE OF INJURY BY DEPARTMENT FY 01 & FY 00 As of August 31, 2001 AGGRESSION
CAUSE OF INJURY BY DEPARTMENT FY 01 & FY 00 As of August 31, 2001 STRAINS
Workers Comp. Fraud Workers Compensation Fraud is committed when a person(s) knowingly or intentionally misrepresents, conceals, or omits a material fact to either obtain or deny workers comp benefits.
Workers Comp. Fraud (contd) Fraud is committed if a person knowingly or intentionally: Makes a false or misleading statement. Makes a false or misleading statement. Misrepresents or conceals a material fact. Misrepresents or conceals a material fact. Fabricates, alters, conceals, or destroys a document Fabricates, alters, conceals, or destroys a document Conspires to commit an act described by the events above. Conspires to commit an act described by the events above.
Fraud Investigative Unit n Investigate allegations of fraud n Validate SIBS, TIBS, and Death Benefits info n Validate suspect travel and prescription reimbursements n Assist DAs and TWCC in prosecution of fraudulent claims n Assist the claims adjusters, agencies, and claimants n Assist SORM in obtaining information that is utilized at BRCs and CCHs
Useful Tool EMPLOYEES RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES FORM RESPONSIBILITIES FORM
Benchmarks n The State Auditors Office (SAO) recommended that SORM create benchmarks for LDD property. n Benchmarks will be based on the Class Code of assets, and an overall agency percentage. n An agency should have procedures for safeguarding assets. Risk Managers can contact their agencys property manager. n We should have the benchmarks in place this spring.
Appropriation Reduction n The Comptroller was charged by the 77 th legislature to reduce an agencys appropriations by 50% of the value of lost property, if the percentages are in excess of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. This was implemented at the end of FY02 and was continued by the 78 th Legislature in Article IX, Sec. 11.03 of the General Appropriations Act. *Implementation Guidelines for General Appropriations Act, Art. IX, §9.03, 77th Leg., R.S. -- Appropriation Reductions for Lost Property http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/fm.notices.date.html/fm02/fm 02-47.html http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/fm.notices.date.html/fm02/fm 02-47.html http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/fm.notices.date.html/fm02/fm 02-47.html
LDD Definitions n Class Codes n Disposal Methods n Lost Damage & Destroyed Property n Historical Cost vs Depreciated Value n Property level vs. Component level
LDD Process n Missing Property n Stolen Property n Damaged/Destroyed Property n Negligence
Useful Websites SPA Class Codes and Annual Financial Report (AFR) Categories: http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/spa/spa_class_codes- afr_cats.html http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/spa/spa_class_codes- afr_cats.html SPA Disposal Methods for Fixed Assets: http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/fm_manuals/spa_man/spa_user 2000/spauser_appd1.html http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/fm_manuals/spa_man/spa_user 2000/spauser_appd1.html Missing, Damaged or Stolen Property Report: http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/taxforms/74-194.pdf
Useful Websites (contd) State Agencys Property Managers http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/agency_c ontact_list/spa/st_agy_spa_contacts.html http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/san/agency_c ontact_list/spa/st_agy_spa_contacts.html State Auditors Office Report http://www.sao.state.tx.us/Reports/report.cfm/report/0 1-032 http://www.sao.state.tx.us/Reports/report.cfm/report/0 1-032