Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Annie Ruch and Kylie McBride. The First A mendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Annie Ruch and Kylie McBride. The First A mendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise."— Presentation transcript:

1 Annie Ruch and Kylie McBride

2 The First A mendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble...” Original interpretation: protects liberty, restricts the government; thus protects rights of the people Current interpretation: restricts government power

3 De Jonge v. Oregon (1936) Facts: Dirk De Jonge (Communist Party) arrested for violating Oregon’s criminal syndicalism statute Issue: De Jonge believed he was protected under 14 th amendment’s due process clause Significance: Court agreed with De Jonge, he has right to peaceably assemble and also free speech Due process clause violated

4 Cox v. New Hampshire (1941) Facts: five Jehovah’s Witnesses convicted by NH’s municipal court for a procession of 68 Jehovah’s Witnesses without a license Issue: the statute requiring a special license violated 14 th amendment rights Significance: court held that the convictions were a valid safety precaution for assembly

5 N.A.A.C.P. v. Alabama (1959) Facts: Alabama required the N.A.A.C.P. to reveal all of the member’s names and addresses in order to stifle operations Issue: Alabama demanding the names could violate 14 th amendment’s due process clause Significance: court agreed that Alabama was violating the due process clause of the 14 th amendment

6 Coates v. City of Cincinnati (1970) Facts: a Cincinnati statute made it illegal for three or more people to gather in a way considered annoying to passerby Issue: considered a violation of 1 st and 14 th amendments Significance: court said public intolerance is not a basis for violation of constitutional rights

7 Smith v. Collin (1977) Facts: American Nazi Party chose to march in Skokie, Illinois, an area heavily populated by Jewish people. Issue: Frank Collin, on behalf of the Socialist Party of America, claimed that 1 st amendment rights were violated Significance: courts agreed that the Nazi’s had the right to march and peaceably assemble wherever

8 Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York Facts: The PCN enjoined Schenck and others from constantly staging blockades and other illegal activities in front of abortion clinics. Issue: Went against the First Amendment's Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Speech. Significance: Fixed buffer zones were constitutional while floating buffer zones were not.

9 Hill v. Colorado Facts: Sidewalk counselors offering abortion alternatives to women entering abortion clinics were limited by Colorado statute that made it unlawful to approach a person within 100 ft. of a health care facility. Issue: Went against the First Amendment’s Freedom of Speech and Press. Significance: It was declared constitutional because it was a limitation on where freedom of speech could occur.

10 Boy Scouts v. Dale Facts: Dale, who was a gay troop leader in the Boy Scouts, was kicked out on account of his sexuality because it did not demonstrate a clean and straight lifestyle, as upheld by the Book of Conduct. Issue: Denied Dale his Freedom of speech. Conclusion: Declared that this was constitutionally sound because they had a constitutional right to bar homosexuals.

11 Chicago v. Morales Facts: Gang members were told they would not be allowed to loiter in public areas. Issue: Denied them their freedom of Assembly. Significance: The police may be able to order them to disperse, but the law is unconstitutionally vague and allows police too much power. http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990- 1999/1998/1998_97_1121 http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990- 1999/1998/1998_97_1121

12 Impact of the Cases Broadened rights of all citizens to peaceably assemble States/cities lose the right to restrict assembly unless it violates safety measures Even unpopular groups/issues have the right to assemble

13

14

15 Article 1. What limits the freedom of assembly in New York? 2. When did the issues regarding freedom of assembly arise? 3. How can we have had so many cases that protect and enforce freedom of assembly yet there is still no unlimited freedom of assembly in New York? http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/29/opinion/shop- walk-work-and- demonstrate.html?ref=freedomofassembly http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/29/opinion/shop- walk-work-and- demonstrate.html?ref=freedomofassembly

16 Works Cited "Freedom of Religion - Guaranteeing Freedom of Expression: The First Amendment - LibGuides at Gallaudet University Library." Home - LibGuides at Gallaudet University Library. Web. 15 Sept. 2011.. "Interpretation of the First Amendment." UO — School of Journalism and Communication. Web. 15 Sept. 2011.. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law | A Multimedia Archive of the Supreme Court of the United States. Web. 17 Sept. 2011.. Web. 16 Sept. 2011.


Download ppt "Annie Ruch and Kylie McBride. The First A mendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google