1. 1 The First Sixty Hours Maryland Outcomes for Teacher Education

2. 2 Committee’s Charge Accomplish seamless articulation for teacher education between two and four year colleges. Fall 1999

3. Dennis Hinkle, TU Patricia Basili, PGCC Susan Arisman, FSU Beth Barnett, SSU Fran Kroll, HCC Maureen McDonough, CCCBC Dick Jantz,UMCP Ellen McLaughlin, AACC Janice Wright, FCC La Jerne Cornish, Goucher College John Bing, SSU Members of TEAC Committee

4. Initial Attempts Select groups of courses that will transfer Problems  disruption of program designs,  no group of courses were acceptable (without bloodshed),  debate over the role of field experience at two year colleges.

5. Change in approach! Address problem in same terms being used in the current reform of teacher education. Plan the outcomes not the courses.

6. 6 Outcomes Document For the first sixty hours of Teacher Education (based on NCATE standards and other professional standards documents.)

7. Purpose of Outcomes Document Clarify what a teacher candidate must know and be able to do as a result of the first sixty hours of study Be a template for an Associate of Arts degree in Teaching

8. What Outcomes can accomplish! assist community colleges organize teacher education programs participating colleges must ascertain and certify that the outcomes are in place in existing courses add courses to meet outcomes certify that appropriate assessments are in place

9. What A.A. in Teaching can do provide well prepared transfer students: All students enrolled in Associate of Arts degree in Teaching must take PRAXIS I exam upon completing 45 credit hours and pass the exam to get the degree. May serve as a two-year credential for teacher aides/ long term subs

10. Who wrote the Outcomes? Summer TEAC Committee was formed. Met for six days in June 2000 at the Gateway Business Center of Howard Community College.

11. Summer TEAC Funded by:  MSDE- Title II funds  University System of Maryland - Pew Charitable Trust  MHEC- Incentive Grant

12. Summer TEAC Thirty-four representatives from: 15 community colleges 10 four year institutions, 1 public school system, and the Maryland Higher Education Commission

13. Summer TEAC Product Content area groups wrote outcomes for their area. Language Arts, Mathematics, Social and Psychological Foundations, Social Science, Art, Science, Diversity and Behavioral Foundations. Technology outcomes accepted.

14. Fall 2000 - Spring 2001 Writing Sub-Committee met 3 times in August/September  Basili, Ferris, Kroll, Thatcher, McDonough, Little. Organized group reports into whole document. Document sent to community colleges and four year colleges and posted to Web Board for comment and feedback.

15. Next Steps Meeting of subcommittee to revise document. July 2001 - MHEC adopts new regulations for the AAT. Community colleges conduct internal meetings to certify that outcomes can be met. Submission to MHEC for program approval.

16. Next Steps Community colleges submit applications for grants to support development of curriculum, recruitment and marketing strategies.

17. Anticipated Benefits More and better teachers. Continuous communication and collaboration among institutions

18. Then What? Do it all over again for secondary education.

19. For More Information Go to the World Wide Web site for the Maryland Intersegmental Chief Academic Officers group at: http://mdcao.usmd.edu Click on the “Committees” button.