1. A SCENIC OVERVIEW OF J/  PRODUCTION IN HEAVY ION COLLISIONS AT PHENIX Matthew Wysocki, University of Colorado For the PHENIX Collaboration

2. Introduction 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 2  This is an overview of the PHENIX J/  results in hot nuclear matter, ie QGP.  I’ll be showing R AA and v 2 in Au+Au collisions, as well as R AA from Cu+Cu collisions.  Hopefully by the end you’ll have a nice overview of the current landscape.

3. 8/20/2008 Why J/  s? Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 3  “If high energy heavy ion collisions lead to the formation of a hot quark- gluon plasma, then colour screening prevents cc binding in the deconfined interior of the interaction region.” - Matsui & Satz, 1986  Debye screening (from EM plasmas) is a modification a particle’s potential due to the charge density of the surrounding medium.  One way to look at it is that the charmonium potential well is modified in the medium to become much shallower. T=T c T=0 In Medium

4. J/  s Unbound 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 4  Another view is that the energetic short-range interactions in the QGP overwhelm the charmonium binding interaction.  The charm and anti-charm become unbound, and may combine with light quarks to emerge as open charm mesons.

5. The PHENIX Detectors 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 5 Au ion y>0 Au ion y<0 MuTr and MuID detect J/ ψ  at forward rapidities. Drift Chamber, Pad Chamber, EMCal & RICH detect J/ ψ  ee at mid- rapidity. Beam-Beam Counter used to measure centrality and collision z-position.

6. Measuring the J/  at PHENIX 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 6  Use a Glauber model combined with a Negative Binomial distribution of particles going into the BBC (3<  <3.9) to map centrality classes to N part, N coll, etc.  Extract J/  by removing the combinatoric background either through like- sign subtraction or event mixing, then fitting the remaining peak.

7. 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 7 Studying J/  Suppression with R AA

8. R AA 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 8  Take the yields from nuclear collisions and divide by p+p yields, scaled by the appropriate number of binary collisions (N coll ).  Deviations from unity should first be compared to CNM effects. Any remaining suppression can be attributed to the deconfined medium (QGP).

9. R AA vs. N part in 200GeV Au+Au 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 9  Obvious suppression in more central collisions (larger N part ).  Larger suppression at forward rapidity than mid-rapidity.  Need better CNM constraints to really test QGP screening. Hopefully Run 8 d+Au data will provide that. nucl-ex/0611020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 232301

10. R AA vs. p T in 200GeV Au+Au 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 10  Less suppression at higher p T in 20-40% and 40-60% central.  Much interest in p T dependence recently, esp. at higher p T. See for example: Zhao & Rapp, arXiv:0806.1239 Z. Tang (STAR) arXiv:0804.4846  We hope to push higher in p T with Run 7, but still very hard with current statistics. nucl-ex/0611020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 232301

11. R AA vs. N part in 200GeV Cu+Cu 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 11  Run 5 Cu+Cu J/  results available at arXiv:0801.0220 and accepted by PRL.  Cu+Cu R AA is in line with CNM projections from d+Au (central lines in panels a &b), while Au+Au is further suppressed.

12. 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 12 Studying J/  Formation with v 2

13. Elliptic Flow 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 13  Precise measurements of the flow of heavy quarks could tell us about how they thermalize with the medium, as well as how many J/  s come from recombination.  We expect J/  s which are formed via recombination to inherit the flow properties of the individual charm quarks. And, we already know that open charm mesons flow.  So a large J/  v 2 could indicate that most J/  s are coming from recombination. Could also manifest as a difference between forward and mid-rapidity due to differing charm densities. Alan Dion, QM2008

14. Reaction Plane and v 2 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 14  In Run 7, PHENIX used the new Reaction Plane Detector, allowing for almost a factor of 2 improvement in reaction plane resolution. 

15.  A bit underwhelming at the moment. A small improvement to the dimuon result is expected from analyzing the minimum-bias sample.  For dielectrons, this is only 42% of the Run 7 data, so a larger improvement could be had, but still ~√2.  Most consistent with zero or negative v 2.  Really need RHIC II luminosities to make a precise measurement. J/  v 2 in Run 7 Au+Au collisions 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 15 Catherine Silvestre, Hard Probes 2008

16. Projections for RHIC II 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 16  We can use a simple MC or an analytic expression to estimate the error on v 2 for a given sample size (RHIC II projection).  Also incorporate PHENIX RP resolution and J/  signal/background. *RHIC II J/  projections courtesy Tony Frawley

17. Summary 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 17  PHENIX has measured J/  R AA in Au+Au and Cu+Cu.  Larger suppression at forward rapidity in Au+Au.  Cu+Cu consistent with CNM projections.  First measurement of J/  v 2 in Run 7 Au+Au.  Future high-luminosity running will allow precise measurement of J/  v 2.  New d+Au data should allow better constraint of CNM effects, and therefore QGP effects. *All wildlife photos taken in Rocky Mountain National Park

18. 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 18 Backups

19. 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 19 v 2 Statistical Error We’ll call our randomly distributed variable X: Now we can write down some basic statistical quantities: But we’ll be taking multiple samples, so our measurement is the mean of X, and the statsistcal error is the sqrt of the variance.

20. 8/20/2008 Hot Quarks - M. Wysocki 20