How many of you like MnDOTs current P/T contract performance evaluation?
How many of you dont like MnDOTs current P/T contract performance evaluation?
How many of you know what happens to the evaluations?
Purpose: Improve the processes for evaluating project performance Benefits: Refined process that will give useful, consistent feedback Offer chance to express concerns Automated (ease of use)
White Paper Goals: Develop tools and processes for performance evaluations that benefit MnDOT and the Consultant Community Transparency and Consistency should be included in the evaluation process Include the Department of Administrations evaluation requirements and incorporate into the process
Goals (Cont.) Define expectations of both sides up front. Establish and define criteria by which the consultant and MnDOT will be measured/evaluated Key points: MnDOT and Consultant PM review performance metrics before the project begins And Consultant will also be reviewing MnDOT Performance
Rating ConsultantA MnDOTB ContractA+B
Project Management Project Development Deliverables PM (Key Personnel)
1 – Low (Does not meet expectations) 3 – Meets Expectations 5 – High (Exceeds Expectations)