Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 9 Concepts and Theories of Stratification.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 9 Concepts and Theories of Stratification."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 9 Concepts and Theories of Stratification

2 Most important topic in sociology?  Titanic example –Survival percentages… 60% of 1 st class, 36% of 2 nd class, 24% of lower decks  Marx quote in Manifesto: –The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles

3 Social Stratification = ranking people in terms of money, power, prestige  Trait of society… not primarily about individual differences –We “pick” our place, we “make” our opportunities? –Titanic lower strata did not die because of personal failing  Persists over generations –In our country, considerable social mobility, but clear inter-generational patterns  varies greatly…. But is universal

4 Income Inequality in the US  http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/inc ome03/prs04asc.html

5 Marx’s Concept Of Class  Industrialization led to increased inequality – Marx saw this  Predicted it would become worse  Eventually, 2 classes: bourgeoisie and the proletariat.  Bourgeoisie owns the means of production.  Proletariat must sell labor to the bourgeoisie.

6 How was Marx “right?”  Class struggles are relevant in the history of the world  False consciousness vs. Class consciousness relevant in all “revolutions.” –True “class” only comes with consciousness of mutual circumstances, mutual interests, common enemies  $ most relevant dimension of stratification  Capitalism lead to exploitation? (Are there negative effects of the “profit motive?”)

7 How was Marx “wrong?”  $ not the only way societies stratified  2 great classes did not emerge –Industrialization initially produced great inequality, but eventually produced a middle class –Revolution did not occur as he predicted (US most industrialized of all)  Classless society impossible

8 Weber’s Three Dimensions Of Stratification  Marx shaking up the intellectual and political world – Read Manifesto, p. 44  Observed that strat more than $. That is, “life chances” determined by more than just $  E.g., Clergy might have status and power, but little money  Based stratification on three independent factors: –Class ($, property) –Status (prestige) –Party (power – ability to get one’s way despite resistance)

9 In all societies, people unequal in $, prestige/status, and power. Implications????  Parking rules the same for you and me?  $, status, power matter in “life chances.” In college admissions, for example –Affirmative action?  Kerry and Bush given any advantages as a result of the $, status, power of their families? –Daily Show Video

10 Social Mobility – a change in one’s position  Chap 2 we learned about Ascribed vs Achieved status  Caste system – position at birth determines (or mostly so)  “Class” system like ours there is considerable mobility - one can achieve status, $, power – Are we a true meritocracy? (Social strat based solely on merit?) – of course not

11 2 kinds of Social Mobility  Structural Mobility – when % of higher status positions increases, upward mobility inevitable –Industrialization did this (Marx did not anticipate structural mobility) –Mostly helpful in cross cultural –E.g., Brought down apartheid?  Exchange Mobility – without structural changes, for every person who moved up, one would need to move down

12 Classless possible?  Marx a utopian thinker – remove “means of production” result in classless society?  Dahrendorf – technically true, since Marx defined class as ownership of means of production  But Marxism did not produce classless society

13 Easy to see why – go back to Italian sociologist Mosca’s, The Ruling Class (1896): 1. Human societies cannot exist without political organization. 2. Political organization = inequalities in power. - Societies must be stratified in terms of power 3. Because human nature is self-serving, people with more power will use it to exploit others and gain material advantages. -Power inequalities will result in $ inequalities

14 Functionalist Theory of Social Strat – Davis and Moore  Positions differ in their functional importance  Some positions more difficult to fill  Reward system ensures that important, difficult positions filled

15 Criticisms?  Justify inequality?  Societies “fair” in the way the identify people to assume important positions (race, class, gender do matter)  Circular? A tautology? –Position is functionally important. How do we know? Because it is rewarded. Why is it rewarded? Because it is important.

16 Toy Society – a great illustration  Replaceability – thinking this way helps with the circular problem  Spaceship crashes – survivors need 4 things to survive (food, air, water, heat) –Ay produces all 4 – only she can produce air  Next generation must create a reward structure that ensures production of air.

17 A Conflict Theory “corrective”  Inequality inevitable… reward structures functional… yes, but something not quite right  Conflict theory brings us back to basic assumption: humans pursue self interest  Ay has $, status, power – can exploit this position of power –Gap between haves and have nots greater than functionalism would predict

18 Politics of Replaceability – can replaceability be manipulated?  Physicians better at healing, given a monopoly on healing – AMA formed  AMA controls the supply of doctors –doctors limit supply of doctors  AMA limits others from doing doctor related tasks  AMA can create its own demand –E.g., “addiction” model creates clients  AMA, from this perspective, an interest group  Unions also an attempt to manipulate replaceability and create demand

19  Great quote: Functionalism can explain why doctors (or… fill in the blank) make more than orderlies, but it requires conflict theory to explain why the gap is as large as it is.


Download ppt "Chapter 9 Concepts and Theories of Stratification."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google