1. 1 Improving Interoperability through the use of ISO 10303 Presented by : Ron Wood Date:August 25, 2005

2. 2 Authors  T. BriggsIntergraph Corp.  B. GischnerElectric Boat Corp.  T. Rando Electric Boat Corp.  J. MaysNaval Surface Warfare Center - Carderock Division  R. WoodNorthrop Grumman Ship Systems

3. 3 Agenda  Background and History Interoperability Use of STEP and XML Development of STEP for Shipbuilding  Integrate Shipbuilding Environment (ISE) Implementation Projects  Summary

4. 4 Background and History

5. 5 Need for Interoperability

6. 6 Levels of Interoperability INTOP Inter-business system domain Shipyard A Shipyard B Inter-System Inter- component IDE Parts Library PDM/CAD ERP/CAM Inter-System Inter- component IDE Parts Library PDM/CAD ERP/CAM

7. 7 7 Co-design Co-production Maritime Supply Chain Logistics Information Support Integrated Development Environment * Web-based supplier catalogs * Shared parts library * Web access to as-planned & design product model * Web-based system diagrams * Web-based interop with simulation & analysis * Web-based product model sharing * Browser access to product related documents * Collaboration best practices * Shipbuilding enterprise components ISE Integrated Shipbuilding Environment

8. 8 Collaboration among Shipyards is Required in Today’s Environment  Almost every major recent U.S. Navy ship design and/or construction contract has involved collaboration among multiple shipyards For example: –CVNX (NGNN & EB) –DDX (NGSS - Ingalls & Bath) –Initial LPD Award (NGSS - Avondale & Bath) –VIRGINIA (EB & NGNN)  This trend will continue  Navy views system interoperability as enabling multiple yards to be viewed as “One Shipyard”

9. 9 Goals of Integration  Better analysis through simulation  Re-use of data instead of redundant data increased accuracy eliminates unnecessary checking speed of data entry (already entered)  Facilitates partnering with other firms  Reduce overhead costs

10. 10 Overview of STEP STEP (ISO 10303 - Industrial automation systems and integration - Product data representation and exchange)  International Standard for the computer-interpretable representation and exchange of product data  The objective is to provide a mechanism that is capable of describing product data throughout the life cycle of a product, independent of any particular system  The nature of this description makes it suitable not only for neutral file exchange, but also as a basis for implementing and sharing product databases and archiving

11. 11 XML- Extensible Markup Language  Traditional STEP transfers have been via STEP Physical File exchange as defined by Part 21  To take advantage of Web technology, Part 28 is under development to standardize STEP transfers using XML  ISE Project is implementing its transfers using XML as well as permitting Part 21 file exchanges

12. 12 XML Goal and Mission  Goal Use XML Schema to represent as much of EXPRESS semantics as possible so that XML Schema can be used to: –Document the information model –Provide delegated validation services –Support the XML instance formats standardized in Part 28  Part 28 Mission Use XML to publish STEP EXPRESS Schemas Use XML as a STEP implementation method

13. 13 XML = Industry Standard Container for Data STEP = ISO Standard Language for Data* Data Company A Standards Virtual Ship part(s) Company B Transactions of Data Packaged in Standards XSLT - map data to another XML schema XML and STEP XML (good for CAE applications) & it brings: Accepted format/schema method Web-enabling STEP (good common language for CAD Product Models) & it brings: Standards for data expression Standards for geometric exchange

14. 14 Development of STEP and XML for Shipbuilding

15. 15 ISO Shipbuilding – Background  Effort of Shipbuilders, Regulatory Bodies, CAD Software Companies, MOD, DOD from Various countries  1996 to 1999 US Effort under MariSTEP Project Funded under DARPA/MARITECH –DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects) Prototyped early versions of AP215, 216, 217 and 218 Exchanged AP218 data with European SeaSprite Project  Current U.S. effort under NSRP ASE

16. 16 Shipbuilding Projects Over Time NIDDESC / US NIDDESC / US 1987 - 1993 MariSTEP MariSTEP 1996 - 1999 CIMS / Japan 1991 - 1994 GPME / Japan 1995 - 1996 NCALS - ShipCALS / Japan Japan 1997 ShipSTEP / EU 1994 - 1996 ITIS / Germany 1992 - 1995 ISIT/US NEUTRABAS / EU EU 1989 - 1992 IT in Ship Operation 1994 - 1997 MARITIME / EU 1992 - 1995 SeaSprite/ EU 1996 - 1999 ISE ISE 1999 - 2005 HARVEST HARVEST 2001 - 2002 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

17. 17 MariSTEP Project 1996 - 1999 ISDP Export: MariSTEP APs 215, 216, 217, 218 GSCAD Import: MariSTEP 218 Import and Export: MariSTEP APs 215, 216, 217, 218 Import and Export: MariSTEP APs 215, 216, 217, 218 Import and Export: MariSTEP APs 215, 216, 217 STEP Northrop Grumman Newport News VIVID Northrop Grumman Newport News VIVID Electric Boat Corporation CATIA Electric Boat Corporation CATIA NAVSEA & NGSS - Avondale Industries ISDP (Intergraph) NGSS - Ingalls Shipbuilding Cvaec Dimension III (CV / PTC / Ciarrai) NASSCO TRIBON (Kockums Computer Systems) VIVID Export: MariSTEP APs 215, 216, 217, 218 GSCAD Import: MariSTEP APs 216, 218 First U.S. STEP Shipbuilding Implementation Project

18. 18 SeaSprite Project Exchange Scenarios Prototype European STEP Implementations 1996-1998

19. 19 Ship Product Model Exchange Ship Structural Envelope Distribution SystemsEquipment/Subsystems Miscellaneous Ship Arrangement ISO AP 215:2004 Ship Moulded Forms ISO AP 216:2003 Ship Structures ISO AP 218:2004 Piping (Plant Spatial Configuration) ISO AP 227:2001 Cable Trays (Plant Spatial Configuration) ISO AP 227 Edition 2 Parts Library ISO 13584 Oil and Gas ISO 15926 AP 233 Systems Engineering Data Representation AP 239 Product Life-cycle Support Ship Product Model Data Exchange ISO TC 184/SC 4/WG 3 Computational Fluid Dynamics ISO AP 237 Ship Structural Envelope (hull form, arrangements, structure) Distribution Systems (piping, electrical, HVAC, cable trays, mechanical) Equipment/Subsystems Mechanical Systems (Plant Spatial Configuration) ISO AP 227 Edition 2 HVAC (Plant Spatial Configuration) ISO AP 227 Edition 2 Logistics/Spares ISO AP 232:2002 Electrical (Electrotechnical Design & Install) ISO AP 212:2001 Finite Element Analysis ISO AP 209:2001 Automotive ISO AP 214:2001

20. 20 Shipbuilding Product Data in STEP SystemProductDefinitionAnalysis / Simulation Delivery Results and Cable harnessdesign : AP212 HVAC : AP227 ed.2 Shipbuilder Parts : PLIB StructuralAnalysis : AP209 StructuralAnalysis : AP209 ShipStructures : AP Ship Machinery: AP Process Plant Piping: AP ShipStructures : AP218 Ship Machinery:AP227 ed.2 Process Plant Piping: AP227 ShipArrangement : AP ShipArrangement : AP215 ShipMouldedForms : AP ShipMouldedForms : AP216 System Engineering : AP233 Product Configuration : AP203 Technical Data Package : AP232

21. 21 Ship APs Now ISO Standards  AP215, ISO TC184/SC4 10303-215 IS "Application protocol: Ship Arrangement". available from Geneva or National Standards bodies as ISO 10303- 215:2004.  AP216, TC184/SC4 10303-215 IS "Application protocol: Ship Moulded Forms”. available from Geneva or National Standards bodies as ISO 10303- 216:2003.  AP218 ISO TC184/SC4 10303-218 IS "Application protocol: Ship structures". available from Geneva or National Standards bodies as ISO 10303- 218:2004.  AP227 ISO TC184/SC4/WG3 “Plant Spatial Configuration”. AP227 has now passed its final ballot for Edition 2 has been sent to Geneva for publication. Includes all the information needed for the marine industries to exchange information about piping, HVAC and machinery.

22. 22 AP 215:2004 Ship Arrangement Zone Boundaries Controlling Access Design Authority Cargo Stowage Machinery Compartments Crew Occupancy Common Purpose Spaces Stability intact damaged Compartments types properties (shape, coatings, adjacency, access….) Loading conditions General Subdivision of a Ship into Spatially Bounded Regions Cargoes assignment to compartments weight, centre of gravity

23. 23 Surface, wireframe and offset point representations Design, Production and Operations lifecycles General characteristics Main dimensions Hullform geometry Major internal surfaces Hydrostatics Intact Stability tables AP 216:2003 Ship Moulded Forms

24. 24 Technical Description Weight Description AP 218:2004 Ship Structures Configuration Management Class Approval Approval Relationship Change Administration Promotion Status Structural Parts Feature Plate Edge Content Opening Profile Profile Endcut Production Design Data Product Engineering Data Geometric Representations Wireframe Complex Wireframe Surfaces Solids Hull Cross Section Product Structure Generic Product Structure System Space Connectivity Assembly

25. 25 AP 227:Ed 2 Piping/HVAC/Cableway/ Mechanical Distributed Systems Stress Analysis Connectivity assembly penetrations ports Pipe/Duct Flow Analysis and Sizing Configuration Management of Product Structure Versioning and Change Tracking Bill of Materials 2-D and 3_-D Shape Representation Diagrammatic Presentation Solid Model Presentation Interference Analysis

26. 26 AP 212:2001 Electrical Design and Installation Electrotechnical Plant Plant, e.g., Automobile Unit, e.g., Engine Control System Subunit, e.g., Ignition System Electrotechnical Systems Buildings Plants Transportation Systems Equipment Coverage Power-transmission Power-distribution Power-generation Electric Machinery Electric Light and Heat Control Systems Data Supporting Terminals and Interfaces Functional Decomposition of Product 3D Cabling and Harnesses Cable Tracks and Mounting Instructions

27. 27 AP209:2001Composite & Metallic Analysis & Related Design

28. 28 The Navy and Shipbuilders Are Using Product Model Data Technology Product Model Data = 3-D CAD + definitions + other documentation Continued investment is key indication of value

29. 29 Implementation of the STEP Standards

30. 30 ISE Background  First NSRP major systems technology project  Phase 1: Requirements definition and architecture for shipbuilding systems interoperability March 1999 to December 1999  Phase 2: Deployment for Structure & Piping March 2000 to December 2003  Phase 3: Deployment for HVAC & CPC Interfaces October 2003 to October 2004  Phase 4: Arrangements, Electrical, Analysis, Steel Processing January 2005 to January 2006

31. 31 ISE Team Participants

32. 32 ISE Builds tools to Support 2nd Generation IPDE Digital MOCKUP Collaborative Design-Build 3D Design Electronic DRAWING Virtual Product & Process Digital Ship Design Process Evolution Enhanced Product Model Lean Design Rule Based Design Internet Technologies Remote Collaboration Intensive Simulations High-end Integrated Analysis Desktop Visualization Business Process Modeling Integrated Design/Build Process Sophisticated Eng.Analysis Simulation Based Design Computer-Aided Drafting Data Config. Mgmt. 3D Visualization (Polygonal) Interactive Walkthrough Anthropomorphic Modeling 3D Wireframe/Solids Rudimentary Data Mgmt First Generation Integrated Product Development Environment (IPDE) 2nd Generation IPDE

33. 33 ISE Project Approach  Develop and demonstrate tools that are low cost can be selectively used by shipyards to support interoperability capitalize on XML and related Internet technologies  Flexibility is critical allow shipyards to transform their data to/from common information model  Drive development of shipbuilding product data standards (e.g. STEP, PLIB) Construct a single Shipbuilding Information Model Demonstrate and educate U.S. shipbuilding community

34. 34 ISE architecture represents an innovative, practical solution to the information interoperability challenge  Accessible to large and small shipyards Only system dependency is Web infrastructure Utilizes open standards  Innovative integration of STEP and XML technologies Supports sharing of geometric & geometric product models  Permissive (mediation) architecture Lets each enterprise choose its own tool set  Incorporated into CAD platforms used by U.S. shipbuilders

35. 35 This ship is used to locate and retrieve torpedoes and missile drones. It has a maximum payload capacity of 42 long tons which includes the deck cargo plus full liquids, full complement, and normal stores. This ship was selected because it is in- service, has a complete set of drawings available for distribution, and is: Approved for Public Release: Distribution Unlimited. The ISE Test Ship TWR 84135

36. 36 ISE-2: Moulded Forms, Structure and Pipe

37. 37 Demonstration Storyboard April 10, 2003 2 LEAPS 3 IntelliShip 1 FlagShip Foran SafeHull Supplier Parts Lib 10 12 S IMSMART CAM (IPT) 16 18 Tribon 14 ST-Viewer Database Deliverables 4 5 6 11 13 15 19 17 CAM CAE 8 9 7a AutoCAD Pipe Stress CATIA 7b

38. 38 Demo Scenario - Design & Analysis AP 216 STEP translator Convert to EDO XML User invokes tool through command Web / SOAP Send request via SOAP Export Using STEP AP 216 Return Hydrostatics results via SOAP View data in Browser FlagShip reads data, performs hydrostatic analysis

39. 39 Integration of IntelliShip & FastShip Convert format to ISE EDO XML IntelliShip User requests hydrostatic analysis AP 216 STEP translator Export hull using STEP AP 216 Internet Send analysis request and hull via SOAP FlagShip invoked. Reads data, performs hydrostatic analysis Hydrostatics analysis results returned as XML document via SOAP User views results in Browser

40. 40 Demo Scenario: SENER-FORAN v50 STRUCTURAL DETAILED DESIGN and STEP EXPORT FORAN Structural Detailed Design FORAN Preliminary Design StandardsSeams & Butts structure, Internal Hull,Decks TWR ship TWR ship’s structure ready to be exported by FORAN-AP218 STEP Export translator Midship Section Calculations Selective STEP Export To ABS Finite Elements Calculations To EB Transverse BulkheadsWhole Structure

41. 41 ISE Process - Detail Piping Design Demonstration on April 10, 2003 CATIA V5 Tribon M2 ISE

42. 42 ISE Process for Feeding Analysis Programs from Structural Design Atlantec TRIBON Intergraph ISDP Intergraph IntelliShip

43. 43 As-Is Process Design & Analysis Design Tool Multistep, sequential process of design, analysis, evaluation of analysis on design Analysis Tool Multiple tools Separate design & analysis environments Different design & analysis formats Designer Separate design & analysis users Analyst Hardcopy or document format Analysis Results Manually import data 2. Analyst performs analysis 3. Designer evaluates analysis results Manually import data 1. Designer generates design for analysis Design Data

44. 44 ISE Process Design & Analysis Design Tool Integrated process of design, analysis, evaluation of analysis on design Interoperable tools Single virtual design & analysis environment Design & analysis results both electronic format Designer User performs design & analysis Electronic format Analysis Results Analysis Tool Electronically invoke analysis services 1. Designer requests analysis Design Data Electronic format

45. 45 Simulation and Modeling of Shipboard Piping Systems

46. 46 Overview – Piping Functional Design 46

47. 47 Additional Benefits  Validated As-Built model can be used to: Validate the design and ensure that all requirements are met Evaluate different design alternatives Form a basis for creating an On Board Training System (OBTS) and schoolhouse training system Evaluate refits and upgrades throughout the lifecycle of the vessel Validate control system algorithms Test the control system prior to delivery Perform manning analyses

48. 48 ISE-3: HVAC

49. 49 Analysis (SIMSMART) Initial HVAC Design (ISDP) Detailed Design Tool1 (TRIBON) Manufacturing Sister Shipyard Detailed Design (FORAN) Analysis Detailed Design Tool 2 (CATIA) CPC Legend demonstrated discussed Order Material CPC Parts Catalog CAD Tool ISE3 HVAC Demo (October 2004) CPC

50. 50 Washington DC Integrated Shipbuilding Environment HVAC DemonstrationOctober 2004

51. 51 ELBOW H = 4” W = 6” R in = 4” R out = 12” DUCT H = 4” W = 6” L = 86”” TRANSITION H 1 = 4” W 1 = 6” H 2 = 3” W 2 = 12” L = 12” Revised Duct for Demo H = 4” W = 6” L =12” Manufactures Test Case 4

52. 52 ISE-4: Steel Processing, Arrangements, Electrical, and Analysis

53. 53 ISE4 – New NSRP Project  Awarded – January 2005  Includes Ship Arrangements (AP215) Electrical (AP212) Analysis (AP209) Steel Processing (AP218, 238, 240)

54. 54 AP215 Test Environment

55. 55 Steel Processing Steel Processing Stages Scantling Design Detailed Design 3D Neutral Manufacturing 2D Neutral Piece Parts 2D Shipyard Piece Parts CAD Information ModelsFunctions Production Planning Piece Part Development Manufacturing Definition Nesting NC Drawings & Reports Moulded Forms & Lines Preliminary scantlings Structural systems Unit Breakdown Structural Part Definition Structural Part Relationships Seams Features Assembly breakdown Assembly order Welds Bevels Bending lines Flat pattern parts Marking Lines Shipyard specific parts Added material Marking lines, Labeling Tabs Manufacturing Aids

56. 56 ISE Steel Processing System Overview AP216/ 218 EB-specific Mfg Data (AP/216/218/238) NG SS-specific Mfg Data (AP/216/218/238) Weld type Construction Symbol Weld symbology Roll Quality Check Forming Method Line Heat Girth Tape Box Mold Weld ref. note … Marking Line (Stiffener) Marking Line (Thk throw) E7018 Shop Process/Rules GD-EBNG-SS NC Steel Processing System Design definition with ‘neat’ geometry Connectivity/part relationships and structural hierarchy Production Planning Piece Part Development Manufacturing Definition Nest Reports, Dwgs, etc. Reports, Dwgs, etc. Manufacturing definition with explicit geometry Joint/Edge preparations End cuts Added/Removed material Marking lines CAD

57. 57 Generate 2D Nesting Part Objects

58. 58 AP209 Analysis

59. 59 AP212 Electrical

60. 60 Possible ISE4 Demo

61. 61 STEP Shipbuilding Implementation Forum  A Testing Forum for the STEP Shipbuilding APs has been established  It is being run under the auspices of the NSRP Systems Technology Panel  It will test and validate implementations of the STEP Shipbuilding APs  Forum began in 2004 with AP216 testing

62. 62 Summary

63. 63 ISE Tools  Tools developed by the ISE Project are made available on the Web at: www.isetools.org  These include: Formal information requirements published –Ship Piping –Ship Structures –Ship HVAC –CPC Interfaces Translator generators for custom representations XML schema generators –ISO 10303-28 ed 2 Automated test frameworks for conformance testing

64. 64 Implement in Production  The goal of current and future efforts is to make these techniques and tools available in production and to all U.S. shipyards STEP Shipbuilding Translators XML Tools Common Parts Catalog Interfaces  A Website is being established to contain the relevant software tools, schemas, etc. as provided by the ISE Project www.isetools.org

65. 65 Summary  ISE 1,2 & 3 has successfully demonstrated the potential of standards based data exchange to LEAN design and construction processes for HVAC, molded forms, structures and piping.  ISE4 is looking at Electrical, Ship Arrangements, Steel Processing, Analysis  Two major challenges lie ahead of us: Commercialization of this technology Continuing to prototype standards based data exchange in other application areas such as system engineering

66. 66 Goal : Implement in Production  The ISE Project has developed tools and demonstrated interoperability between shipyards in the areas of: Structure Piping HVAC Common Parts Catalog Interfaces  The goal of current and future efforts is to make these techniques and tools available in production and to all U.S. shipyards STEP Shipbuilding Translators XML Tools Common Parts Catalog Interfaces  A Website has been established to contain the relevant software tools, schemas, etc. as provided by the ISE Project www.isetools.org

67. 67 Conclusions  These testing, modeling, and simulation efforts are part of an attempt to develop a suite of product model data exchange tools that will enable U.S. Shipyards to become more productive  These efforts revolve around implementation of the ISO 10303 STEP Shipbuilding standards  The APs that enable these exchanges have completed their development and approval as International Standards  The focus is now shifting to testing and validating their implementations

68. 68 Conclusions (cont’d)  In order to increase the availability and lower the price of production ready tools: The ship owner / operator needs to insist that data be delivered in a system neutral format The shipbuilder needs to insist that STEP functionality be an integral part of product  The next challenge is to move this technology into the mainstream and that the technology is mature enough to transition into commercial CAD and Product Modeling products

69. 69 DISCUSSION