Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers

2 Training Overview For separate modules: Module 1: Introduction to DPAS II Module 2: DPAS II and the Delaware Framework Module 3: The DPAS II Process Module 4: Component Five – Student Improvement DRAFT

3 Materials for this module Power Point Presentation DPAS II Guide for Teachers http://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtmlhttp://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml. DRAFT

4 DPAS II: Process Roster Identification Measures Selection Fall Conference Pre-Observation Conference Observation DRAFT

5 DPAS II: Process (continued) Post-Observation Conference Formative Feedback Documentation Summative Evaluation Conference Summative Evaluation Documentation DRAFT

6 DPAS II: Process (continued) Improvement Plans Effective 2013-2014, changes to Regulation 106A modifies when an Improvement Plan must be developed versus may be developed. Changes to Regulation also eliminate some requirements related to Professional Development completed by a teacher during an Improvement Plan. The Challenge Process DRAFT

7 Professional Responsibilities Form completed in Fall Discussions held during pre and post- observation conferences Discussion during summative evaluation conference DRAFT

8 Pre-observation Form Required for Novice Teachers May be waived for Experienced Teachers Only if both the teacher and evaluator agree Conference Required for all announced observations – may not be waived Does not apply to unannounced observations Whenever possible, held in teachers classroom or work area DRAFT

9 Observations Announced or Unannounced Length of observation Frequency of observations Limitations on when observations may occur Evidence collection DRAFT

10 Post-observation Conference Requirements Teacher Responsibilities Lesson Reflection Template - optional Timing DRAFT

11 Formative Feedback Requirements and Timeline Evidence Formative rating documentation How do rubric levels translate to Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory performance? DRAFT

12 Summative Evaluation Requirements and Timelines Evidence Summative ratings Summative evaluation forms DRAFT

13 Summative Ratings Chart Total # of Satisfactory ratings in Components I-IV Component VSummative Rating 4/4ExceedsHighly Effective 4/4SatisfactoryEffective 4/4UnsatisfactoryNeeds Improvement 3/4ExceedsHighly Effective 3/4SatisfactoryEffective 3/4UnsatisfactoryNeeds Improvement 2/4ExceedsEffective 2/4SatisfactoryEffective 2/4UnsatisfactoryIneffective 1/4ExceedsNeeds Improvement 1/4SatisfactoryNeeds Improvement 1/4UnsatisfactoryIneffective 0/4ExceedsNeeds Improvement 0/4SatisfactoryNeeds Improvement 0/4UnsatisfactoryIneffective DRAFT

14 Pattern of Ineffective Teaching DPAS II Rating Year IYear 2Year 3 Ineffective Needs ImprovementIneffectiveNeeds Improvement Ineffective Needs ImprovementIneffective Needs Improvement Ineffective DRAFT

15 Overall Feedback Commendations Recommendations and expectations Difference between expectations and recommendations How expectations are communicated How evaluators asses teacher performance toward expectation outcomes Documenting completed expectations Additional feedback DRAFT

16 Challenge Process Used when a teacher disagrees with the evaluators assessment Different from Grievance (can only grieve process infractions) Must try to resolve difference with evaluator first Submit written challenge to evaluators supervisor within 1 working days of receipt of evaluation document Within 15 working days the supervisor of the evaluator must meet with the teacher Within 15 work days the supervisor of the evaluator must issue a written decision DRAFT

17 DOE monitoring of DPAS II Annual audit of DPAS II formative and summative evaluation documents Conducted by DOE staff All information is strictly confidential Use of review criteria to ensure written evaluation documents provide Objective, specific, and relevant evidence of teacher performance and areas for commendation Supportive, specific, and actionable guidance, including timelines, for any recommendations and/or expectations DRAFT


Download ppt "The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google